Posted on 03/19/2005 11:30:38 AM PST by Ravi
Just heard on Fox that U.S. Senate will convene today in emergency session regarding Terri Schiavo.
That offer was probably a blatant Felos lie but even if it was true, SCUMBAG could not take it and risk Terri getting rehabilitated and tesifying against him.
LOL
I must say, you are creative! To make this into a love story is priceless!
Read the timeline of events in this case. Then tell me how much poor Michael has grieved.
Again, thanks for the chuckle
"If you have a written directive, it doesn't apply to you."
And if you don't and your family want's to pull the plug after oh I don't know, say 20 years. Then it's the government's decision? No thanks.
Thanks for the info. The whole life support thing is such a gray area.
Talk about not tolerating another point of view.
"Terri's maiden name is SCHINDLER."
OMG! Any relation?
"Would you agree the death penalty is the same, we ought not to be doing that?"
Cute. That is straight from the demonrat play book. Why are you here? Generally speaking, in a nut shell - conservatives agree that life is a very precious right - to be protected at almost any cost - and if in fact someone shows total and absolute disregard for the sanctity of life (by commiting a heinous crime, for example) we take the most precious right that we have AWAY from him... yes, that would be that persons life. I am adamantly pro-life and respectfully - pro-death penalty.
The State is something beyond both FedGov and state government. The governments are not the State, but part of the State. It is an abstract entity not always clearly perceived. Partly this is due to confusion of different meanings of the word. I capitalize State to indicate the abstract entity in this technical sense.
There are no machines keeping her alive.
But that is not really that important, as CT scans are the preferred test for brain and organ pictures. Not MRI's.
We know that these have been done as well.This is another lie to cause public reaction by the family.
This time they told it to officers of the court,(lawyers) and congress. Not just the news media.
Their freedom to lie will be coming to an end soon. If there is real justice in this country still.
How long would it take to starve Teddy?
17 minutes ago
Politics - U. S. Congress By SIOBHAN McDONOUGH, Associated Press Writer
WASHINGTON - Congress leaders announced agreement Saturday on legislation they said would allow a severely brain-damaged woman to resume being fed while a federal court decides the right-to-die battle between her parents and her husband.
AP Photo
"We think we have found a solution" to the Terri Schiavo case, House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, said at a Capitol Hills news conference. "All sides agree that this is the best way to proceed."
Final approval was expected Sunday when the House planned to meet in a special session, he said. The Senate planned to pass a resolution Saturday evening that would let House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., call the House into session on Sunday.
DeLay said President Bush (news - web sites) would sign the bill as soon as it got to him.
The compromise was similar to a Senate bill passed Thursday that would let a federal court has jurisdiction in the Schiavo case. House Republicans had favored broader legislation that applied similar cases that questioned the legality of withholding food or medical treatment from people who are incapacitated.
Schiavo's feeding tube was disconnected Friday afternoon. Schiavo, 41, could linger for one to two weeks if no one intercedes and gets the tube reinserted.
Rep. James Sensenbrenner, chairman of the House Judiciary Committee (news - web sites), said the legislation would move the case to federal court where a judge would determine who has the legal right to decide the question of nutrition and hydration for Schiavo and whether they can be terminated.
Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., said the measure was "narrowly targeted," does not set a precedent and would allow Schiavo to resume being fed and hydrated during the legal appeals.
For a decade, a feud has raged between Schiavo's husband, Michael, and her parents, Bob and Mary Schindler, who have tried to oust Michael Schiavo as their daughter's guardian and keep in place the tube that has kept her alive for more than 15 years.
Michael Schiavo says his wife told him she would not want to be kept alive artificially. Her parents dispute that, saying she could get better and that their daughter has laughed, cried, smiled and responded to their voices.
President Bush's spokesman said Friday that the president supported the congressional efforts. "We appreciate those who are standing on the side of protecting and defending life," Scott McClellan said.
Also Friday, Republicans used their subpoena power to demand that Schiavo be brought before a congressional hearing, with lawmakers saying that removing the tube amounted to "barbarism."
The Florida judge presiding over the case rejected the request from House lawyers to delay the tube's removal. Late Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court (news - web sites), without comment, denied an emergency request from the House committee that issued the subpoenas to reinsert Schiavo's feeding tube while the committee filed appeals in the lower courts to have its subpoenas recognized.
"Are there any young women out there who would expect their husbands to sit by their bedside wiping their drool and cleaning their ass for 30 years?"
And I suppose we should move on with our lives after the birth of a severely disabled child too....... My husband and I have wiped drool and changed diapers for 18 years.. x2. But we were young when we had kids so we can dump the kids and move on, now?
You either commit or give guardianship to someone who will....
After my ?, I saw that...
I should read more, post less.
very true, but then we need to focus limiting him via a finding of SOME court.
(BTW I do hope he is admitted to practice in the Middle federal district of FL....)
BTWW Fox just had this south FL lawyer on arguing that this was a bill of attander. (his only claim to fame is the TV wrestling child death case.) That lawyer is only a criminal lawyer and has not done any substantive civil law. He knows not what he speaks. Why is fox even bothering with him?
Got it now, thanks for clarifying.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.