Where HAVE these people been for the past five elections? The nation has voted more and more conservative beginning in 1994. It culminated with a strong Bush victory and additions to the Republican legislative numbers this past year. Why is the Los Angeles Times surprised because President Bush made conservative choices? That is the politics on which he successfully ran for office.
1 posted on
03/18/2005 1:11:51 AM PST by
Vetvoice
To: Vetvoice
John Bolton knows the UN for what it is, and that is the problem. Cockroaches hate light.
2 posted on
03/18/2005 1:15:56 AM PST by
Arthur Wildfire! March
(I hope my [hello?] watermarks aren't too [yaa-aah!] distracting.)
To: Vetvoice
BWAHAHAHA BWAHAHAHAHA BWAHAHAHAHA Michael Kinsley and the
Los Angeles Times Leftists are saddened, deeply saddened! BWAHAHAHAHA BWAHAHAHAHA BWAHAHAHAHA - they just keep getting slapped for their pains. Yes, I'll have a heaping order of esperanto, please! ;-)
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
3 posted on
03/18/2005 1:17:34 AM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Vetvoice
"And we thought we were being provocative when we nominated Bono, the rock star, for the same job."
Didn't Boxer say that Sheets Byrd was the rock star? Perhaps Senator N-Word should get the job? Byrd is far more entertaining than Bono.
4 posted on
03/18/2005 1:19:39 AM PST by
Arthur Wildfire! March
(I hope my [hello?] watermarks aren't too [yaa-aah!] distracting.)
To: Vetvoice
5 posted on
03/18/2005 1:19:48 AM PST by
nopardons
To: Vetvoice
Actually Rumsfeld at the IAEA sounds just about right.
6 posted on
03/18/2005 1:20:44 AM PST by
thoughtomator
(Sick already of premature speculation on the 2008 race)
To: whoever
"...indiscriminately lending money to corrupt governments in the name of development..."
We need to look at our incredibly safe sossshhhhhh security funds to get an idea of how righteous our own government is.
7 posted on
03/18/2005 1:21:48 AM PST by
Arthur Wildfire! March
(I hope my [hello?] watermarks aren't too [yaa-aah!] distracting.)
To: Vetvoice
WaitPerson! A heaping platter of schadenfreude for of each presstitute at the LA Slimes table. Be sure a magnum of Liberal Whine accompanies that order.
To: Vetvoice
I see a lot of ranting about Wolfowitz and Bolton, but I don't see the LA Times coming up with any Liberal alternatives in this story.
Like all of the liberal MSM the Times is full of anti-Bush bluster, but gives no alternatives.
12 posted on
03/18/2005 2:08:19 AM PST by
Noachian
(Impeach a Judge - Save a Nation)
To: Vetvoice
I love how the Lefties question the credentials of anyone within the administration they want to trash. However, contradictions abound as they usually (in a negative light) rattle off of the positions of whom they attack.
13 posted on
03/18/2005 2:10:37 AM PST by
endthematrix
(Declare 2005 as the year the battle for freedom from tax slavery!)
To: Vetvoice
Ya know,
I was always a staunch supporter of the administration...
But seeing how much fun they are having screwing with the Leftistas... between the appointments and the dropping of the Nuclear option in congress, and the continual defiance of the "Critics" and the oil drilling thats going to happen in Alaska...
It just makes me all warm and fuzzy inside. Seeing the "Progressives" progress further and further towards apoplexy and total breakdown... Makes me proud to be a neocon.
I wonder how long it will take them to realize they are more in need of an endangered speices act than the snail darters they cherish so much.
Keep going L.A. Times, shout it to the heavens, lolololololol!
14 posted on
03/18/2005 2:22:25 AM PST by
ManMountain
(In case of social breakdown remember Liberals... The other white meat.)
To: Vetvoice
Ya know,
I was always a staunch supporter of the administration...
But seeing how much fun they are having screwing with the Leftistas... between the appointments and the dropping of the Nuclear option in congress, and the continual defiance of the "Critics" and the oil drilling thats going to happen in Alaska...
It just makes me all warm and fuzzy inside. Seeing the "Progressives" progress further and further towards apoplexy and total breakdown... Makes me proud to be a neocon.
I wonder how long it will take them to realize they are more in need of an endangered speices act than the snail darters they cherish so much.
Keep going L.A. Times, shout it to the heavens, lolololololol!
15 posted on
03/18/2005 2:23:00 AM PST by
ManMountain
(In case of social breakdown remember Liberals... The other white meat.)
To: Vetvoice
In fact, if Wolfowitz is to succeed at the bank, he will have to continue pulling the organization away from the approach it took in the McNamara years of indiscriminately lending money to corrupt governments in the name of development. By their own words, in lobbying against Wolfowitz the LA Times is lobbying that the World Bank should give money equally to corrupt governments. They're worried Wolfowitz will actually discriminate against these corrupt governments.
16 posted on
03/18/2005 4:33:16 AM PST by
libertylover
(Being liberal means never being concerned about the truth.)
To: Vetvoice
So it was the LA Times that nominated Bono for the World Bank. I had wondered where that had come from.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson