This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 03/20/2005 11:04:28 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator, reason:
new thread here http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1366995/posts |
Posted on 03/17/2005 5:58:41 PM PST by tutstar
Edited on 03/17/2005 5:59:54 PM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
They should be able to be there, at least part of the time, and with the guards there, maybe even most of the time.
CSPAN Santorium talking about TERRI CASE NOW!!!
Utterly Barbaric!!!!!
Here is the link:
http://www.c-span.org/watch/cspan2_wm.asp?Cat=TV&Code=CS2
Amen
The "removing the tube" language has put a spin on the whole matter. People equate it to ventilators. I have seen that, as well. Mother-in-law on one for 27 days while the doctors tried to diagnose. Horrible that was, because, it turned out she was terminal when they put her on it.
Had we known she was terinal, we would have, in good conscience, denied the artifical repiration.
Thanks for the link bizzzymom.
This story has lots of information in it. I think we can post cnn in it's entirety
It needs a separate thread too.
Supreme Court rejects Schiavo appeal
Feeding tube to be removed from brain-damaged woman Friday
Friday, March 18, 2005 Posted: 0245 GMT (1045 HKT)
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/LAW/03/17/schiavo.brain-damaged/
(CNN) -- Less than 18 hours before Terri Schiavo was scheduled to have her life-sustaining feeding tube removed, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected an emergency appeal by her parents to stop the procedure.
The court rejected the appeal by Bob and Mary Schindler on Thursday, clearing the way for Schiavo's husband, Michael, to have the feeding tube removed Friday -- 15 years after she collapsed from heart failure that led to her brain damage.
Meanwhile, legislation that would keep her alive appeared to stall in the Florida Legislature and the U.S. Congress.
With time running out in the case, President Bush weighed in on the matter Thursday, saying society and the nation's courts "should have a presumption in favor of life" on such matters.
"Those who live at the mercy of others deserve our special care and concern. It should be our goal as a nation to build a culture of life, where all Americans are valued, welcomed and protected -- and that culture of life must extend to individuals with disabilities," Bush said in a written statement.
The Schindlers filed an emergency appeal early Thursday with the Supreme Court to stop the feeding tube from being removed, arguing that their daughter's religious freedom and due process rights were being violated. But at 7 p.m., the high court rejected the appeal without comment.
On another front, the Florida Supreme Court rejected a request for a stay by the state's Department of Children and Families, citing a lack of jurisdiction. The agency had argued that it needed time to investigate allegations of abuse by Schiavo's husband.
In Washington, the U.S. Senate passed a narrower version of a House bill that would give federal courts jurisdiction in Schiavo's case. The House passed a broader bill Wednesday that would give federal courts jurisdiction, not only for the Schiavo case, but also for people in similar conditions.
With the House in recess for Easter, it appeared that a compromise bill would not make its way to Bush's desk, because there was not enough time to reconcile the differences.
The Senate's bill prompted a terse response from House Speaker Dennis Hastert and House Majority Leader Tom DeLay.
"House Republicans knew we had a moral obligation to act and we did just that last night," they said in a joint statement. "As Terri Schiavo lays helpless in Florida, one day away from the unthinkable and unforgivable, the Senate Democrats refused to join Republicans to act on her behalf."
In response, Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid shot back, "If the House Republicans refuse to pass our bipartisan bill, they bear responsibility for the consequences."
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist said he was proud of the Senate bill and called on the House to follow its lead.
"To knowingly and purposely starve Ms. Schiavo to death would be callous, cruel and immoral," said Frist, a doctor. "I am hopeful that the House will consider and pass this legislation quickly."
Bills in the Florida legislature also seemed to fizzle by late Thursday.
Lower courts have ruled that Schiavo, 41, is in a "persistent vegetative state."
Michael Schiavo contends his wife would not want to be kept alive artificially. But her parents argue she had no such death wish and believe she can get better with rehabilitation.
Both sides have been embroiled in a legal wrangle over whether Schiavo should live or die. Schiavo did not leave anything in writing about what she would want if she ever became incapacitated.
Courts have sided with her husband in more than a dozen cases over the years.
A probate court late last month ruled that, barring a stay, Schiavo's feeding tube would be removed at 1 p.m. Friday. Upon removal of the tube, the court estimated Schiavo would die in seven to 14 days.
Her feeding tube has been removed twice before, most recently in 2003. That year, Gov. Jeb Bush pushed a law through the Florida Legislature that authorized him to resume the woman's feedings six days after a court stopped them. The Florida Supreme Court later ruled the law unconstitutional.
This moment will be remembered for centuries to come as a turning point in American history, as infamous as January 22, 1973, both cases a result of the judicial system arrogating power the writers of our Constitution never intended.
They are talking about the two versions.
Said there will be meetings tomorrow.
They will talk about passing the house bill but won't be able to take a vote on that until MONDAY!
Call your Senators NOW!
MONDAY IS TOO LATE!
Thank you.
Fine. I want everyone of them to fast and go without water until Monday and see what they think of this "mercy killing" then.
Greer ordered only photos and the court will hold the photos until Terri is dead.
MONDAY IS TOO LATE!
I wonder if Governor Bush could issue a hold on her until this bill is through.
Poor Terri. She must be terrified to see them there.
Actually, I think Annie is correct. Michael has to provide the videographer -- at his own expense.
Oh, no, I was copying the post by amdgmary, that's why I put it in quote marks!
I'm not in Florida.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.