Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/16/2005 6:12:01 AM PST by Crackingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: Crackingham; cpforlife.org

Oh my God.

Can't really think of anything else to say.


2 posted on 03/16/2005 6:14:30 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

More background would be helpful


3 posted on 03/16/2005 6:14:50 AM PST by nuconvert (No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

These liberal judges can't stand to have a murdering thug executed for his/her crimes, but they have absolutely no problem pulling the plug on an innocent life. How perverse and sickening can they be?


4 posted on 03/16/2005 6:15:30 AM PST by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
Texas law allows hospitals to discontinue life-sustaining care, even if a patient's family members disagree. A doctor's recommendation must be approved by a hospital's ethics committee, and the family must be given 10 days from written notice of the decision to try and locate another facility for the patient.

A very hard matter to decide. I have seen both sides. The very worst - babies with no chance of living that are kept alive (at the hospital expense) so that the parent can continue to collect the baby's social security check (yes, they get one).

5 posted on 03/16/2005 6:15:37 AM PST by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
See this thread for last night's discussion of the same event.
7 posted on 03/16/2005 6:16:42 AM PST by Clara Lou (Hillary Clinton: "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Oh, God. My heart breaks for the family. What have we come to in this country when medical doctors don't work to sustain life? Does not the hypocratic (sp) oath say that doctors are to "do no harm"?

I'm ready to march on William McCulloch's court.


8 posted on 03/16/2005 6:17:57 AM PST by katieanna (Fear Not. Believe Only.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

What's so ironic is we had to battle doctors who wanted to place my 92 year old FIL on a vent, even though his Living Will specifically stated that he did not want to have artificial means of respiration.

The man had MRSA and was incoherent from a number of strokes, and yet they kept insisting we put him on a vent.

We resisted, but I can't even explain the kind of pressure they were exerting: it was daily and for weeks.


10 posted on 03/16/2005 6:20:03 AM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
According to everyone except this boy's mother, the child's physical condition was such that his life could not be maintained without the respirator because of a birth defect. If I remember correctly, his problem was that his lungs would continue to grow, but that his rib cage would not, thus slowly, and presumably painfully, squeezing the life out of him. There was no treatment for it, borne out by the fact that there was no other facility that could help him at all.

His mother didn't help her cause by claiming that the child didn't have an earthly father, that he was conceived by the Sun, thus his name. She had been evaluated by the psych unit of the hospital, but they didn't try to commit her. I guess the hospital didn't want to do that because they didn't want to seem heartless in not allowing her to be with her son.

There is nothing that requires hospitals to continue treatment if that treatment isn't going to make someone better. If there is no way that someone is going to survive, it is not required to keep them alive through artificial means.

11 posted on 03/16/2005 6:23:03 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

The resources required to keep this baby alive could have kept hundreds alive somewhere else. Choices are always tough when it comes to these issues. We live in a world of limited resources and rationing is a fact of life.


13 posted on 03/16/2005 6:26:54 AM PST by DaoPian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation; LadyPilgrim

My good G-D:{{{{{{{{{Ping thank you


14 posted on 03/16/2005 6:28:54 AM PST by anonymoussierra (Lux Mea Christus!!!"Totus tuus" Quo Vadis Domine?Thank you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

May he rest in peace with the angels.


25 posted on 03/16/2005 6:41:24 AM PST by ContraryMary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
So if it's OK to remove someone's only form of life support (i.e. a respirator) against their wishes, then someone please tell me why Christopher Reeve was allowed to live as long as he did?
41 posted on 03/16/2005 6:52:26 AM PST by Fan_Of_Ingraham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
May God comfort this baby in his loving arms and then help our sad and lost world.

Muleteam1

43 posted on 03/16/2005 6:53:03 AM PST by Muleteam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
Sun's death marks the first time a U.S. judge has allowed a hospital to discontinue an infant's life-sustaining care against a parent's wishes, according to bioethical experts. A similar case involving a 68-year-old man in a vegetative state at another Houston hospital is before a court now.

And so it begins, judges are now officially gods having the power of life and death, over the innocent. Looks like Hitler won the morality war after all.

58 posted on 03/16/2005 7:00:33 AM PST by itsahoot (There are some things more painful than the truth, but I can't think of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Evil.


65 posted on 03/16/2005 7:02:25 AM PST by Puddleglum (Thank God the Boston blowhard lost)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
Since February, the hospital has blocked the media from Hudson's invitation to see the baby, citing privacy concerns.

Whose privacy?

85 posted on 03/16/2005 7:15:14 AM PST by Sloth (I don't post a lot of the threads you read; I make a lot of the threads you read better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

I need more details on the baby's actual medical condition. Was he microcephalic? Was he anacephalic? I think it was just as bad or worse to remove that parasitical head on that 'twin' which actually had brain activity.


108 posted on 03/16/2005 7:30:46 AM PST by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

Sometimes I wonder if any of these Posters realise how many machines it would take to keep everyone alive if we never pulled the plug. Decisions to remove life supports are made evry day many times a day. If we just kept plugging people in and keeping them alive when without a machine they would die we would need hundreds of veggie hospitals.

Sure its an ugly fact, but decisions have to be made .
I state here and now If I am brain dead ,in irreversible coma, have terminal cancer, or just a paraplegic, please pull my plug, Do not destroy my family with bills they cant pay and dont make them come to the hospital daily to watch me vegetate with no hope of ever seeing me as I was.


117 posted on 03/16/2005 7:36:49 AM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham

I saw this baby's mother on Fox once. She is a total raving lunatic. She was going on and on about the baby being some kind of god. You can't believe a word she says.


124 posted on 03/16/2005 7:40:47 AM PST by lady lawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Crackingham
a medical staffer at Texas Children's Hospital gently removed the breathing tube

Bias here?

I have never heard a reporter say:

"The hitman gently pulled the trigger..."
"The attacker gently forwarded the knife..."
"The rapist gently pushed in his d#*k..."

130 posted on 03/16/2005 7:43:34 AM PST by KidGlock (W-1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson