Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Engaged Men Are Setting Up Divorce Nest Eggs
The Hoosier Gazette ^ | March 16, 2005 | August Wayne

Posted on 03/16/2005 3:28:28 AM PST by MississippiMasterpiece

The high percentage of marriages that end in divorce has created a new trend; many men are planning financially for their divorce before they even get married.

A recent survey conducted by the Indiana Family Institute (IFI) found that 79% of men who are engaged to be married worry that their marriage will end in divorce and they will be ruined financially. As a result, more than half of these men admitted to setting up secret nest eggs in case their fears become reality.

“Some people believe this is the height of pessimism, but to me it makes perfect sense,” says Dr. Phillip Haus, director of the study, “Many of these men are professionals who have worked hard for their success and don’t want to start from scratch if the woman they marry turns out to be a total witch to live with.”

Haus says the most common way engaged men plan for the worst is by setting up a savings account in the name of a relative they trust who has had a long, sound marriage so their funds will be safe. This way once the joint assets are divided after a divorce, they will have a little something extra to fall back on.

“Let’s face it,” added Haus, “The man is the one who almost always get screwed over when a divorce occurs. Even though he usually made more money than the woman in the marriage, he loses the house, and ends up paying child support since the woman will get custody of their offspring. This new trend just provides him with a little insurance so he can enjoy a decent standard of living.”

Some men go to even greater lengths to secure their futures. “We had a few cases where engaged men told us they gave a good portion of their belongings to friends or relatives for safe keeping. One man admitted buying a house in his gay cousin’s name so he would have a place to live if things didn’t work out. This shows the sad state of relationships and the impact of divorce in this country.”

Haus believes the trend of setting up divorce nest eggs will continue. “As long as there is divorce, there will be people trying to beat the system.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: divorce; turass
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 next last
To: Sloth

I do not think so. I see it akin to buying a smoke alarm.

It is a question of playing the odds and I would expect the relevance of such a fund diminishes over time. Most divorces happen within six years. (per some FL bar stat somewhere I can not remember exactly where I saw it.)

However, since marriages are happening with the men being older, it makes sense to have certain items before marriage IF possible. Buy a house. Start a pension. Put aside cash.

As for prenups, they tend to work best for "items" rather than concepts like alimony or support. They also work better earlier in the marriage. A two year old prenup is different in divorce court against a 12 year old prenup.

We should look at this from a positive slant. Despite the much vaunted marriage strike (personally I think it is a strike agains marrying liberal women rather than just marriage), men are making preparations so they CAN get married.

These men are not saying no to marriage they are saying to to being unprepared. Besides, the "oh sh*t" fund can be converted to a college fund for the kids or pay for that surprise second honeymoon or that dream cruise where the captain marries you two all over again.


141 posted on 03/16/2005 12:10:08 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: dg62

I was told that if the money was not commingled, it was not community property. We have decided to leave the issue of comingling up to the kids. They can do it or not depending on their wishes.


142 posted on 03/16/2005 12:11:36 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

Interesting.

Even better would be to burn down the house, empty the accounts in Vegas, cancel the life insurance, then hang yourself.


143 posted on 03/16/2005 12:14:18 PM PST by StoneColdGOP ("What does Marsellus Wallace look like?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
Never , ever let a good piece of tail enter your thoughts of marriage. too many men think with the little head. Marriage is a lot more than sex.

Some would say it's everything but sex.

144 posted on 03/16/2005 12:16:49 PM PST by Moonman62 (Federal creed: If it moves tax it. If it keeps moving regulate it. If it stops moving subsidize it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
I see it akin to buying a smoke alarm.

The wiring in your house doesn't suddenly get all lax and sloppy when you put in a smoke alarm. It doesn't know the difference.

A pre-nup or a secret divorce fund, however, means that one or both parties know they are not really committed to the marriage, and therefore are less likely to work at it if problems (or a 'better' offer) come along. The same way you will be much quicker to, say, quit a job if you know you've got something else to fall back on.

145 posted on 03/16/2005 12:19:58 PM PST by Sloth (I don't post a lot of the threads you read; I make a lot of the threads you read better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: ikka

"A better way is to create a separate IRA or 401K account, contribute to it while single, then stop contributing completely before being married... then it will grow and it is never commingled into the assets."

Are you sure about that? Depending on what state you live in,even if you stopped contributions, I think the spouse is entitled to one half of the amount the account increased from the date of marriage to the date of divorce.


146 posted on 03/16/2005 12:22:11 PM PST by TET1968
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

As for second marriages, especially of people who have lived alot of years and are widower/widows, I firmly believe in prenups to protect the children from the first marriages. I have seen horrible things happen to kids when mom or dad marries somebody late in life.

I for one believe in a prenup if there is a substantial difference between spouses, at least a time limited prenup. And I would sign one willingly. But when both are entering the marriage at the same level, broke as we were, why have one.

And having secret accounts is just plain dishonest. Except for my little stash of husbands quarters and nickels that I steal nightly when he plops it out on his dresser. That doesn't count. And I love stealing it and he knows I do it and thinks it is "cute"


147 posted on 03/16/2005 12:26:45 PM PST by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

And 9 out of ten times, who gets the kids?????


148 posted on 03/16/2005 1:06:06 PM PST by chris1 ("Make the other guy die for his country" - George S. Patton Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Rubber_Duckie_27
What's so bad about expecting to be the one with a "long, sound marriage"?

EVERYONE expects that, but statistics tell us that it isn't the case, that's why!

149 posted on 03/16/2005 1:11:45 PM PST by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs


Red stater? What is with the red states and divorce?!


150 posted on 03/16/2005 1:12:45 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell ( CONSERVATIVE FIRST-Republican second.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: expatguy
"Is there any reason now days to get married other than to produce children?"

Not unless you know God and have a desire to do things His way.

151 posted on 03/16/2005 1:15:27 PM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

You are probably right because I'm no expert, but I always thought anything acquired after marriage for whatever reason was automatically community property.

One good thing is that I have never heard any of the married couples in my family ever squabble over this issue.


152 posted on 03/16/2005 1:35:20 PM PST by dg62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: expatguy
Is there any reason now days to get married other than to produce children?

None that I can think of. If marriage was simply a religious ceremony, that'd be fine. The problem with marriage today is that it gets government involved in your relationship. Outside of having kids, it's a needless risk.

153 posted on 03/16/2005 1:44:26 PM PST by FreedomAvatar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat
That fat hog, Zsa Zsa Gabor, is known for saying; "I'm a wonderful housekeeper... every time I divorce, I keep the house."

She played the wife on Green Acres, and reportedly was married and divorced eight times.

On a related note, I read online an account given by a guy who overhead two 20-something fembots talking about their girlfriend who had just married a doctor. The one fembot says to the other; "A doctor? She'll divorce good!"

154 posted on 03/16/2005 2:24:14 PM PST by handk (The truth is the truth even if no one believes it, and a lie is a lie even if everyone believes it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tm22721
Foreign assets are not subject to divorce judgements.

No, but a judge can take the existence of those assets into account (if the spouse finds out about them) and assign a bigger chunk of the domestic assets to compensate (depending on state law and the mood of the judge).

155 posted on 03/16/2005 2:31:29 PM PST by steve86
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece

Sad. Planning for failure.


156 posted on 03/16/2005 2:32:30 PM PST by k2blader (It is neither compassionate nor conservative to support the expansion of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor
Actually, in California, for the ten-year periiod 1993-2003, the average divorce rate was 75%. Seventy-five percent!

I would recommend to all men, especially younger men, to buy, read and study "The Predatory Female". It's available at Amazon.com for $8.95. It "blows the lid off", completely, utterly and totally.

Feminism has destroyed, in my opinion, an overwhelming majority of at least two generations of American women -- and there's no end in sight. They are unmarriable. But not just for the reason of the risk of a man getting raped in divorce court, but for a lot of other reasons, such as (1) more than half of American women are disgustingly overweight gastropods, yet they think they're "all that", (2) it seems that every "woman" under 30 thinks it's "fashionable" to dress like a whore, and (3) according to one recent study a "woman" of 25 years of age has already slept with an average of 30 guys; and something like 30% of females in that age bracket have one or more STD's.

But not to worry! If you've seen the TV commercial for "Valtrex",... "It's a brand new day!". That's right girls, go ahead and be a total slut in your twenties and early thirties, then, when you're tired of dating outlaw bikers and "bad boys", and your biological clock starts ticking, and you want to settle down with a decent man, there's Valtrex!

But you know what? No decent man would want to take marriage vows with a slut.

157 posted on 03/16/2005 3:10:08 PM PST by handk (The truth is the truth even if no one believes it, and a lie is a lie even if everyone believes it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TET1968

The spouse gets 1/2 the increase in value during the divorce as a barganing point.

A qualified divorce resolution order (QDRO) generally sets the disolution of marriage value.

I think most of the nest egg planning is to have cash on hand for the divorce proceedings. This allows the man, who usually is booted out of the house to be able to find a place to stay, and retain a lawyer.

I sympathize with those who say this is preparing for the worst without working for the best, but I think it is not unwarrented to take these steps.

Why should any man wait to marry to buy a house, start retirement plans, or have cash on hand. If it was women we were talking about, there would be no "debate".


158 posted on 03/16/2005 3:12:24 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMasterpiece; Lazamataz; Cacique; nutmeg

JUST SAY NO TO MARRIAGE!


159 posted on 03/16/2005 3:13:37 PM PST by Clemenza (Alcohol Tobacco & Firearms: The Other Holy Trinity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: handk

(s)Born again virgin insurance!(/s)


160 posted on 03/16/2005 3:13:54 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson