Skip to comments.
Ebbers guilty - Ex-WorldCom chairman guilty on all nine counts in massive accounting fraud.
CNN ^
| 3/15/2005
| NA
Posted on 03/15/2005 9:31:26 AM PST by Daus
NEW YORK (CNN/Money) - Bernard Ebbers, the former CEO of WorldCom, was found guilty Tuesday for his role in the mammoth accounting scandal that brought the company down two and half years ago.
A federal jury in New York, on its eighth day of deliberations, convicted Ebbers on all nine counts that he helped mastermind a $11 billion accounting fraud at WorldCom, now known as MCI.
(Excerpt) Read more at money.cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: corruption; ebbers; worldcom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-155 next last
To: SuziQ
Unfortunately, honest folks are hurt by the crooks among us. Those who think they can lie, cheat and steal with impunity often walk about unscathed.
This time, justice prevailed.
61
posted on
03/15/2005 10:38:04 AM PST
by
OldFriend
("If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child might have peace." Thomas Paine)
To: 1rudeboy
Civil court is different than criminal court.
62
posted on
03/15/2005 10:39:21 AM PST
by
OldFriend
("If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child might have peace." Thomas Paine)
To: MamaLucci
The way things are going at FNC, I fully expect to see Scott Ritter hosting a show of his own.
63
posted on
03/15/2005 10:40:30 AM PST
by
OldFriend
("If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child might have peace." Thomas Paine)
To: Daus; Liz; SierraWasp; Southack
64
posted on
03/15/2005 10:41:05 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(The MSM has been a WMD, Weapon of Mass Disinformation for the Rats for at least 4 decades.)
To: SuziQ; Daus
"Yeah, my s-i-l bitterly joked that, after Ebber's got done, her 401K was more like on 001K."
LOL!
What's sad is so many people took early retirement when things were flying high.
Wasn't the $500 million or whatever he already had enough? No, he had to commit fraud to get even richer.
To: OldFriend
I understand. I presumed that this was criminal court. Note that Ebbers was found "guilty," not "liable."
66
posted on
03/15/2005 10:42:26 AM PST
by
1rudeboy
To: wallcrawlr
"unrealized loss or real?"
Well, it was all on paper.
Like so many others, we never sold. It started to slide and nobody could believe that it could keep going down like that. It was a retirement fund and we thought, someday it *has* to bounce back.
Then the fraud became public and it was worth about $250.
To: marvlus
"Ken Lay hasn't been convicted yet, has he?"No, he hasn't. He's got two trials, wants different juries, blames Fastow 9he fooled me, I'm a victim, yada yada; Martha Stewart defense).
On the other hand, John and Tim Rigas were convicted and will be sentenced this month.
Shame the trials couldn't come sooner for Lay, but I'd rather Justice had all it's ducks in a nice, neat row.
68
posted on
03/15/2005 10:46:07 AM PST
by
cake_crumb
(Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
To: Daus
69
posted on
03/15/2005 10:48:15 AM PST
by
higgmeister
(but we'll never get our 401k back)
To: Moonman62
"How much more money has the federal government spent without veto since 2000?"This question has what, exactly, to do with a fraud/conspiracy conviction?
70
posted on
03/15/2005 10:51:01 AM PST
by
cake_crumb
(Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
To: Grampa Dave
GWB proves once again why Values Voters put him back into office.
71
posted on
03/15/2005 10:53:57 AM PST
by
Liz
("There is no safety for honest men except by believing all possible evil of evil men." Edmund Burke)
To: Grampa Dave
As one who has been reading the daily articles on the trial, what's most interesting is that the majority of the talkng heads had it wrong..they all said that Ebbers was making a good defnse..that the government's case was weak, that the jury was falling asleep during the trial, etc....
72
posted on
03/15/2005 10:54:42 AM PST
by
ken5050
(The Dem party is as dead as the NHL..)
To: MEGoody
There are a few out there who insist on defending white collar crooks.
73
posted on
03/15/2005 11:01:35 AM PST
by
KC_Conspirator
(This space outsourced to India)
To: OldFriend
The way things are going at FNC, I fully expect to see Scott Ritter hosting a show of his own. Sad, but true. Geraldo was the first clue.
74
posted on
03/15/2005 11:02:28 AM PST
by
MamaLucci
(Libs, want answers on 911? Ask Clinton why he met with Monica more than with his CIA director.)
To: drt1
Unrealized Loss: A loss that results from holding on to an asset rather than cashing it in and officially taking the loss.
75
posted on
03/15/2005 11:03:56 AM PST
by
wallcrawlr
(www.bionicear.com)
To: Daus
he helped mastermind a $11 billion accounting fraud It would be hard to embezzle that much money on your own. How many other people are going down?
76
posted on
03/15/2005 11:05:13 AM PST
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: mowowie
Or was that Enron? I think that was Tyco.
77
posted on
03/15/2005 11:07:25 AM PST
by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: Dad2Angels
Ebbers has a significant appellate point with the sentencing factors being given to the jury in its instructions. Could have been prejudicial error.
To: proud American in Canada
"It started to slide and nobody could believe that it could keep going down like that."
I first got involved in the stock market in March 2000, when I was 24. Worst timing to dump money into the market since the 1930s, probably.
I dumped all but $10K into the market and had a negative 84% return within 18 months following March 2000. Not everyone thought stocks like Cisco, JDS Uniphase, Nortel, EMC, Network Appliance, etc. were going to tank the way they did. I was trying to be a "buy and hold" investor and I blew it, big time.
I figured the most I'd ever be down would be 33% and I could live with that. For me, getting into the stock market was the single most worst decision I've ever made my entire life. Period. I'd give everything to go back to 1999.
79
posted on
03/15/2005 11:09:27 AM PST
by
jdm
(Stockhausen, Kagel, Xenakis -- world capitals or avant-garde composers?)
To: wallcrawlr; All
"A loss that results from holding on to an asset rather than cashing it in and officially taking the loss."
Yes, and we wouldn't have had the loss had we cashed it in. The stock was soaring and we were not close to retirement, so we held on to it when it started to slip.
And maybe some one can correct me if I'm wrong, but if I'm not mistaken, I believe that MCI contributed more on the matching contributions when you chose to buy MCI stock for your 401K instead of mutual funds.
It was quite some time ago so I don't remember for sure, but I think that MCI encouraged buying their own stock in that way.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-155 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson