Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Free Despite Murder Confession (Murderer free because evidence is too compelling)
The Daily Telegraph [Sydney, AU] ^ | March 12, 2005 | Unattributed

Posted on 03/12/2005 1:34:40 PM PST by quidnunc

A man who confessed to killing two women walked free from court yesterday when a judge ruled the evidence too damning.

Father-of-two Lyle Simpson admitted being a killer, DNA evidence proved he was at the scene of one murder and he tried to commit suicide a day later.

Yet after three days of legal argument in the NSW Supreme Court, Judge Anthony Whealy ruled some evidence was just too damning and ran the risk of "unfair prejudice'' to the accused.

A married Simpson was accused of murdering his mistress Rhonda Buckley, 51, in September 2001 in Georgetown, Newcastle.

But the family of the victim were devastated by the decision which enabled Simpson, 45, to go free after 16 months in jail awaiting trial.

Ms Buckley's daughter Suzy Westgarth said: "I am bloody angry, so angry."

Outside the court yesterday, Simpson said: "I'm relieved to go home. I've got two disabled kids and I just want to live my life and be left alone by the police," he said.

-snip-

But in court, his defence team led by legal aid solicitor Joanne Harris successfully argued the evidence would unduly prejudice the jury.

A court source said: "The evidence would be too prejudicial for the jury to hear, they would naturaly assume from some of the evidence, that he was guilty.

-snip-

What that means, is if the a single piece of evidence is so overpowering it would sway a jury from giving a fair trial, it cannot be used.

-snip-

(Excerpt) Read more at dailytelegraph.news.com.au ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catch22notguilty; lunacy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: redheadtoo

Just read the article again and noticed that this is from Australia, the Digest must have a version of their magazine for down under.


21 posted on 03/12/2005 1:53:04 PM PST by redheadtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
My own belief is that they will end up convicting George W. Bush for this crime. I believe there is absolutely no evidence to link him to the crime -- so he can be convicted without even going through a trial.

Australia is backwards land, right?

22 posted on 03/12/2005 1:53:18 PM PST by ClearCase_guy (The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: quidnunc

Its pretty safe to say, from reading the article, if one were to commit murder in front of a camera, the videotape would have to be inadmissible.


24 posted on 03/12/2005 1:54:36 PM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

When did they legalize LSD in NSW or is it reserved just for Judges?


25 posted on 03/12/2005 1:56:06 PM PST by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopeckne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc; prairiebreeze

This HAS GOT to be a joke, right? Right? sigh


26 posted on 03/12/2005 2:04:49 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #27 Removed by Moderator

To: Peach

He was much too guilty, we just HAD to let him go.

sheesh....


28 posted on 03/12/2005 2:07:49 PM PST by prairiebreeze (Does my American flag offend you? Call 1-800-LEAVE THE USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Sounds like that judge is a real genius.


29 posted on 03/12/2005 2:09:47 PM PST by yldstrk (My heros have always been cowboys-Reagan and Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Solamente
That's what some of the jurors said about OJ - too much evidence!

Or what Emperor Joseph II’s said about Mozart’s opera Die Entführung aus dem Serail:

"Too many notes, my dear Mozart, and too beautiful for our ears."

30 posted on 03/12/2005 2:14:18 PM PST by AZLiberty ("Insurgence" is futile. You will be eliminated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Unbelievable.


31 posted on 03/12/2005 2:20:43 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Principled
"What that means, is if the a single piece of evidence is so overpowering it would sway a jury from giving a fair trial, it cannot be used.:

I guess the Atlanta killer should go free now? There is no doubt that he killed 4 people. Isn't that compelling enough?

32 posted on 03/12/2005 2:23:05 PM PST by dvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Principled

This is an example of post-modernism run amok.


33 posted on 03/12/2005 2:28:12 PM PST by Wilhelm Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze

"Not gill . . . cup? Not gillcup! You have been found not gillcup of the charges made against you and may leave this court a free man."


34 posted on 03/12/2005 2:28:19 PM PST by Charles Henrickson ("Right.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Some idiot tried to make this argument here locally. The trial court slapped him down, and he tried it on the appeals court.

He was laughed out of court (just about literally, the appeals court had some nasty words for him AND his lawyer in the published opinion).

Apparently the idiots got shipped to Australia, and are on the trial court bench over there.

35 posted on 03/12/2005 2:30:42 PM PST by AnAmericanMother (. . . Ministrix of ye Chace (recess appointment), TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Speechless, Liberalism personified.


36 posted on 03/12/2005 2:35:50 PM PST by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

Judge Anthony Whealy ruled some evidence was just too damning and ran the risk of "unfair prejudice'' to the accused.

Quick, hide this article from the US Supreme Court. If the libs on the court see this, Brian Nichols in Atlanta will be set free.


37 posted on 03/12/2005 2:58:30 PM PST by miele man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc

So then someone else should just kill him and document it on videotape. That way THEIR evidence will be deemed "too damning".
RIDICULOUS


38 posted on 03/12/2005 2:58:49 PM PST by RushCrush (I like America to some extent. -Michael Moore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

This idiot judge ought to be nervous. Ms. Buckley's family might decide to get even and leave too much compelling evidence.


39 posted on 03/12/2005 3:05:18 PM PST by demkicker (John McCain is a power hungry traitor and proved it on 2/19/05 in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: quidnunc
Doesn't evidence as such bias the outcome? In fact, isn't that the whole point of evidence?

Therefore I propose abolishing the jury system altogether and replacing it with a coin-toss system. That way every defendant will have fairness, which is to say the exact same chance of acquittal as every other defendant.

40 posted on 03/12/2005 3:25:52 PM PST by A.J.Armitage (http://calvinist-libertarians.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson