Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iwo Jima - A stupid Mistake?
LA TImes ^ | March 10, 2005 | Max Boot

Posted on 03/10/2005 7:10:45 AM PST by rcocean

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-296 next last
To: RaceBannon

George Washington packed way too many men into that boat on the Delaware. Idiot! What about the Women who suffered at Valley Forge? How about that? And Jesus really didn't feel pain on the Cross because he was God and God can't feel pain and neither can fetuses, but lobsters scream, they feel pain, buddy boy, and my last analyst told me that feeling good is only aboout me. I can't worry too much about others ,. .... .;. ;/. Modern thinker


41 posted on 03/10/2005 7:29:43 AM PST by Pat79thST (Pat79thSt. - Irish arthritis - I get stiff in a different joint every night!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RushCrush

Good book.


42 posted on 03/10/2005 7:30:07 AM PST by Radix (Lost: Decent Tag Line; Reward offered.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rcocean
Looking at some of the comments made here makes me wonder how many of you guys even read the article.

Also, in a classic example of shooting the messenger, you berate the columnist and not the author: Marine Capt. Robert S. Burrell.

One more point, MacArthur was also a critic of how Iwo Jima and Okinawa were attacked.
43 posted on 03/10/2005 7:30:19 AM PST by HighFlier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushCrush; Coop; All

From what I've studied, the Marines encountered a Japanese army that had their backs against the wall so to speak, and it was the first "real" exposure to the fanaticism of the Japanese soldier. They would rather be burned alive in a cave than surrender. That type of mentality is what caused so many American casualties.

The Europeans on the other, would for the most part, concede defeat and surrender, with the hope of living. The Japanese viewed life pretty much as the islamofascists of today do. They felt the need to be martyred to bring honor to their family.

As for the LA slimes, don't read it, and never will.

My $.02

Cheers!


44 posted on 03/10/2005 7:30:21 AM PST by SZonian (Tagline???? I don't need no stinkin' tagline!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT

A stat to back up your fine point in my Post #40.


45 posted on 03/10/2005 7:30:44 AM PST by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
The venture was not remotely "cost effective" in terms of American casualties vs. military benefit.

Can you tell us how they were to predict the actual amount of casualties that were to occur before they went in?

And once in, with the casualty rate exceeding all estimates, are you suggesting they should have withdrawn?

46 posted on 03/10/2005 7:30:50 AM PST by Michael.SF. (Someday I will fondly look back on the day Hillary's career ended. Starting tomorrow, I hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Coop
After the capture of Iwo Jima, more than 30,000 American Airmen's lives were saved when more than 2,400 disabled B-29 bombers were able to make emergency landings at the Iwo Jima Airfield after making bombing flights over Japan.

I knew that the lives lost/lives saved balance was favorable, but I had no idea it was that many!

47 posted on 03/10/2005 7:31:25 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: HighFlier
Also, in a classic example of shooting the messenger, you berate the columnist and not the author: Marine Capt. Robert S. Burrell.

The article I provided was taken directly from Capt. Burrell's study. Now I ask you, do the facts I highlighted in that article resemble what was put forth by Mr.Boot?

48 posted on 03/10/2005 7:32:04 AM PST by Coop (In memory of a true hero - Pat Tillman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rcocean
If Iwo Jima hadn't been in U.S. hands, most of the four-engine bombers could have made it back to their bases in the Mariana Islands 625 miles away. And even if some had been forced to ditch at sea, many of their crewmen would have been rescued by the Navy.

Pantload

49 posted on 03/10/2005 7:33:09 AM PST by metesky ("Maine: Last to know; First to go.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet

Thought you might want to see this one.


50 posted on 03/10/2005 7:33:24 AM PST by Michael.SF. (Someday I will fondly look back on the day Hillary's career ended. Starting tomorrow, I hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

We could skip over some of the islands, but we couldn't skip over all of them. If it hadn't been Iwo Jima it would have been an equally bloody battle somewhere else. Iwo Jima was judged to be strategic.

Besides which, who knows what the effect on Japanese morale may have been to this exemplary courage, which must have undermined their propaganda that only Japanese had true courage?


51 posted on 03/10/2005 7:33:36 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop

Well at least you read the article. Not certain what your question to me is.

Both the columnist and the author seem to take exception to the fact that Iwo Jima had to be taken.


52 posted on 03/10/2005 7:35:03 AM PST by HighFlier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
The reason I say this is Boot leaves out one important fact.

Per the official Marine Corps History, the OSS & the JCS (Marshall, King, etc.) and Nimitz had approved a plan to jam Iwo's radio transmitters and bombard (i.e plaster every inch) of Iwo Jima with Mustard Gas.

It would killed every Jap on the island in 24 hours & Marine Corps losses would have been minimal.

However, FDR on his way to Yalta, disapproved of the plan for political reasons. I guess dropping the A-bomb, or firebombing Dresden was OK, but using Poison Gas on Iwo would have made us look bad. Of course, FDR was sick man at this point, and died a couple months later.
53 posted on 03/10/2005 7:35:16 AM PST by rcocean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Coop
The enemy was not ON Iwo Jima, they were IN Iwo Jima.

And all of them were prepared for death in advance. Their job was to kill a certain number of GIs before they died. They accepted that.

54 posted on 03/10/2005 7:35:19 AM PST by Protagoras (If the Republican Party enacts a new tax they will be out of power for at least a generation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
Roosevelt was the worst President in history

At least you got that part right.

;)

55 posted on 03/10/2005 7:35:22 AM PST by Michael.SF. (Someday I will fondly look back on the day Hillary's career ended. Starting tomorrow, I hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

"If Ted Kennedy had been in the Senate in 1945 (hard to believe, but he wasn't), he would have been hollering about the incompetence of the Roosevelt administration, which produced many times more casualties in five weeks than U.S. forces have suffered in Iraq in the last two years."

Who's this guy crappin'? Kennedy would have kissed ol' Frank's butt over and over again.


56 posted on 03/10/2005 7:36:10 AM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcocean
If Pickett's charge had succeeded, today it would be viewed as audacious and brilliant. If Nelson's unconventional attack at Trafalgar had failed, today he would be viewed as a bumbler.

During WWII both sides made numerous costly blunders. For instance, the Japanese should have attacked oil storage facilities at Pearl Harbor and pressed the attack on Pearl Harbor until they out of ammunition and aviation fuel. There was more petroleum at Pearl Harbor on December 8, 1941 than in Japan.

Japanese incompetence in the field of cyphers was criminal.

The truly unnecessary attack was the Phillipines, which advanced absolutely no strategic purpose, rather it allowed MacAuthur to claim a public relations victory by redeeming his pledge to return.

57 posted on 03/10/2005 7:36:34 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Deadcheck the embeds first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

Not one of those 6,000 was this stupid author, so why doesn't he just STFU. These SHITHEADS that blast the military from the comfort of their homes under the umbrella of security the military has provided them, makes my blood boil.


58 posted on 03/10/2005 7:37:07 AM PST by Lekker 1 ("Airplanes are interesting toys, but of no military value"-Ferdinand Foch, French War College, 1911)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rcocean

My grandfather is rolling in his grave right now. What this idiot is ignoring is the fact that if the US had not taken Iwo Jima, the Japanese would have used it against us.

Is any land worth the price in blood? I honestly don't know, but I know my freedom is.


59 posted on 03/10/2005 7:37:24 AM PST by FreedomWatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Didn't read the article so I missed his clear error on the failure to bombard. Iwo was known to be heavily defended to the point that the Chiefs of Staff seroiusly suggested the use of poison gas in place of explosives for bombardment.

The question for me has always been the necessity of taking the island. It was argued that P51s needed the airstrip to escort the B29s. Before the island was secure the decision had been made to concentrate on low level incendiary bombing, rather than so called daylight precision bombing. This made the P51s much less necessary. The second justification for the assault was the B29 bombers that subsequently used the airstrip for emergency landings. The numbers are usually given as 25,000 aircrew saved. This demands that we accept all aircraft that used the strip as lost, if Iwo was in Japanese hands, and all aircrew as KIA. A stretch. What is not a stretch is that the US faced the assault on Okinawa less three highly trained and competent Marine divisions which were rendered unusable after suffering 23.000 killed and wounded on Iwo.

60 posted on 03/10/2005 7:37:57 AM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-296 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson