Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: F16Fighter
The venture was not remotely "cost effective" in terms of American casualties vs. military benefit.

Can you tell us how they were to predict the actual amount of casualties that were to occur before they went in?

And once in, with the casualty rate exceeding all estimates, are you suggesting they should have withdrawn?

46 posted on 03/10/2005 7:30:50 AM PST by Michael.SF. (Someday I will fondly look back on the day Hillary's career ended. Starting tomorrow, I hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Michael.SF.
"And once in, with the casualty rate exceeding all estimates, are you suggesting they should have withdrawn?"

Yes.

There was NO place to hide. Once it was determined fighter strength was too overwhelming, we should have re-grouped, reassessed enemy strength, then either blasted the Japs to Kingdom Come, OR skipped it.

Iwo wasn't essential -- it was a convenience.

184 posted on 03/10/2005 2:41:08 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson