Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Want To Ban 'Cop-Killer' Gun
Cybercast News Service ^ | March 4, 2005 | Susan Jones

Posted on 03/06/2005 7:28:25 AM PST by kimber

Democrats in Congress have introduced a bill to outlaw a specific gun, which a leading gun control group describes as "a clear and present threat to police officers" and "a tragedy waiting to happen."

The bills introduced in the House and Senate on Thursday (H.R. 800/S. 397) would make it illegal for anyone except a police officer or military official to possess a Fabrique Nationale (FN) Five-seveN pistol, which can shoot armor-piercing bullets.

Gun control activists call the Five-seveN a "cop-killing gun," and they have enlisted the support of several law enforcement organizations in their effort to outlaw it. Steve Lenkart, the legislative director of the International Brotherhood of Police Officers, a labor union, has called the handgun "an assault weapon that fits in your pocket."

"We are very grateful to Senators [Frank] Lautenberg (D-N.J.), [Jon] Corzine (D-N.J.) and [Chuck] Schumer (D-N.Y.) and Congressman Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.) for introducing legislation in the Senate and the House of Representatives to outlaw this weapon," said Michael Barnes, president of the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence united with the Million Mom March.

According to a Brady Campaign press release, the "easily concealable, lightweight handgun" retails for about $1,000.

The Brady Campaign says it bought a Five-seveN from a Virginia gun dealer in January, and it says ammunition purchased with the gun was able to penetrate a protective vest. (Virtually all rifle ammunition will penetrate the most common types of body armor worn by police.)

Shoot Wayne LaPierre?


According to the Brady Campaign, the National Rifle Association has defended the weapon and questioned the Brady Campaign's testing of the Five-seveN.

Michael Barnes suggested that NRA President Wayne LaPierre "put on a bullet proof vest, and we'll fire the weapon at him, and see what happens.

"He should put his body where his mouth is," Barnes said.

The NRA responded, calling it "pathetic to see the gun control lobby make hysterical statements to resurrect their failed political agenda."

The NRA noted that according to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, the armor-piercing ammunition is only available to the military and police.

"The Brady Campaign continues to deceive the American people in their effort to ban firearm ownership by all law-abiding Americans," the statement said.

Just another pistol

There is nothing special about the "Five seven," the NRA says on its website.

"It is a semi-automatic pistol, just like millions of other semi-automatic pistols. BATFE has determined that it is 'particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes,' and has approved its importation.

"There is also nothing special about the 5.7mm ammunition being sold to the public," the NRA said, since under federal law, only non-armor-penetrating types of 5.7mm ammunition may be sold.

Company responds


In a recent response to "misinformation" about its Five-seveN pistol, FN Herstal USA made the following points:

-- The Five-seveN handgun is a full-size pistol and is not easily concealable. In fact, it is larger than most current-issue sidearms carried by law enforcement agencies throughout the U.S.

-- The maximum effective range of the Five-seveN handgun is 35 to 50 meters, which is comparable to other commercially available sporting pistols in its range and effectiveness.

-- The only ammunition available to the public are the cartridges defined by Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms & Explosives (BATFE) as suitable for sporting use.

-- All 5.7 x 28 restricted ammunition (armor piercing) is sold only to law enforcement and military agencies. This ammunition is released and shipped from a U.S. Customs controlled custom bonded warehouse, only with approval from the BATFE and U.S. Customs.

Legislation introduced two weeks ago in Congress would shield gun manufacturers, distributors, dealers, or importers from civil lawsuits stemming from the misuse of their products by others.

Supporters of the legislation, including the National Rifle Association, call it a "reckless lawsuit preemption bill." It's intended to prevent anti-gun groups from accomplishing their apparent goal of suing the gun industry into bankruptcy.

But gun control activists such as the Brady Campaign call it an "immunity" bill and say it would "take away the legal rights of gun violence victims."

In a press release issued Thursday, the Brady Campaign warned the legislation "would shield FN Herstal, a Belgian company, from potential lawsuits based on the sale of its cop killer gun."

In fact, the bill would shield all law-abiding firearms manufacturers from politically motivated litigation.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: 2ndamendment; bang; banglist; bradybunch; commiegungrabbers; guncontrol; guns; lousenberg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Liberals just never give up. This is just getting old.
1 posted on 03/06/2005 7:28:27 AM PST by kimber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kimber
I want me one of those!


2 posted on 03/06/2005 7:30:22 AM PST by rdb3 (The wife asked how I slept last night. I said, "How do I know? I was asleep!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimber

If you want to help make cops safer, ban Democrats.


3 posted on 03/06/2005 7:31:54 AM PST by Enterprise (President Bush thought Wead was a friend. Turns out he was just a big fat tape worm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimber

Democrats Want To Ban 'EVERY' Gun


4 posted on 03/06/2005 7:32:58 AM PST by Flavius ("... we should reconnoitre assiduosly... " Vegetius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimber

I know a cop who was shot with his own service weapon. Should we take weapons out of the hands of police officers as well?


5 posted on 03/06/2005 7:33:03 AM PST by cripplecreek (I'm apathetic but really don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimber

Democrats Want To Ban 'EVERY' Gun


6 posted on 03/06/2005 7:33:08 AM PST by Flavius ("... we should reconnoitre assiduosly... " Vegetius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3

I used to have one. They shoot pretty good. Not the sexiest thing in the world though.


7 posted on 03/06/2005 7:38:41 AM PST by KoRn (~Halliburton Told Me......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

bang


8 posted on 03/06/2005 7:40:51 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimber
What's next a .308 hunting rifle?

A .308 hunting rifle would be every bit as deadly as a FN-FAL as they use the same ammo.

The big difference is the FN 'looks' like a military weapon. This is the same absence of logic as the '94 weapons ban, banning guns for cosmetic reasons to make liberal gun grabbers 'FEEL' better.
9 posted on 03/06/2005 7:41:52 AM PST by KoRn (~Halliburton Told Me......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

Every gun can be called "cop killer". Therefore, it's obvious they want to ban every gun.

How about calling guns "rapist killer" or "sick psycho killer"?


10 posted on 03/06/2005 7:43:04 AM PST by winner3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kimber

Cop killer gun? Are cops now like robocop? Bullets bounce off them like peas?


11 posted on 03/06/2005 7:48:50 AM PST by Imaverygooddriver (I`m a very good driver and I approve this message.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Cops can't protect you and most of them freely admit to that fact. They're more likely to use that chalk they carry to draw an outline of your dead body on the ground than to be there to raise their weapon to defend you. I'm not saying they wouldn't defend you if they were there, just that they're not likely to be there.


12 posted on 03/06/2005 7:50:23 AM PST by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: kimber

here we go..

man i'm sick of these jackasses.

call your critters. tell them they had better obey that OATH they took ... "shall not be INFRINGED"...


13 posted on 03/06/2005 7:54:37 AM PST by sdpatriot ("If I know the answer I'll tell you the answer, and if I don't, I'll just respond, cleverly." Rummy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimber

And a .22 wont kill a cop?

just sayin'... why call any one single gun a "cop killing" gun specifically. Lots of guns are really powerful, and can penetrate car doors, etc.

Bones


14 posted on 03/06/2005 7:59:33 AM PST by Bones75
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimber
Democrats Want To Ban 'Cop-Killer' Gun

So, how many cops have been killed by Five-seveN Pistols?

15 posted on 03/06/2005 8:01:41 AM PST by Mike Darancette (MESOCONS FOR RICE '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

You are correct. If they get this one, your .38 snubby is next.


16 posted on 03/06/2005 8:03:10 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kimber

I hope they fail, but I've already got the gun. They can pass all the laws they want but hell will have a hockey team before I mail them my guns (and they damned sure aren't getting into the house to take them).


17 posted on 03/06/2005 8:10:52 AM PST by Jaysun (Ask me for a free "Insomnia for Beginners" guide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimber
Ban all guns except mine!!!


18 posted on 03/06/2005 8:14:16 AM PST by squirt-gun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kimber

No! Ban the "puppy killer" gun! Killing puppies is evil! If Democrats stand for anything, it should be saving the puppies. Baby seals, too.


19 posted on 03/06/2005 8:16:44 AM PST by Nick Danger (The only way out is through)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
Killing puppies is evil! If Democrats stand for anything, it should be saving the puppies. Baby seals, too.

Not to be a jerk, but you do know that we don't use guns when killing the seals right? At every "seal festival" I've ever been to we use clubs or the heels of our boots (I've even had some success with heavy chains).
20 posted on 03/06/2005 8:26:52 AM PST by Jaysun (Ask me for a free "Insomnia for Beginners" guide.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson