Posted on 03/05/2005 10:51:35 PM PST by bd476
A strong earthquake occurred at 05:21:43 (UTC) on Sunday, March 6, 2005. The magnitude 6.3 event has been located NORTH OF SEVERNAYA ZEMLYA. (This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.)
|
|
|
Please put me on your ping list. Thanks.
Okay, Sully you're on the Earthquake Ping List. Please let me know via Freepmail if you ever want to be taken off the Earthquake Ping List.
It was red, meaning recent, when I posted it, time rolls on and now it is orange.
Put me on also!
Are you an earthquake expert?
You seem to know where to find stuff I haven't seen before?
Nite all.
If I hear any bumps in the night, I'll jump out of my skin....
Did you see the joke about why Hillary fainted..trying to squeeze her size 14 butt into a size 8 thong. ugh
HAH! Ewwwwwww!
Okay Ernest, we'll turn the earthquake shaking down very low so you can sleep, LOL!
UTC event time translated to selected world timezones:
Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:21:43 +0000 (UTC [UTC])
Sun, 06 Mar 2005 18:21:43 +1300 (Pacific/Auckland [NZDT])
Sun, 06 Mar 2005 16:21:43 +1100 (Australia/Sydney [EST])
Sun, 06 Mar 2005 14:21:43 +0900 (Asia/Tokyo [JST])
Sun, 06 Mar 2005 13:21:43 +0800 (Asia/Hong_Kong [HKT])
Sun, 06 Mar 2005 10:51:43 +0530 (Asia/Calcutta [IST])
Sun, 06 Mar 2005 08:21:43 +0300 (Europe/Moscow [MSK])
Sun, 06 Mar 2005 07:21:43 +0200 (Asia/Jerusalem [IST])
Sun, 06 Mar 2005 06:21:43 +0100 (Europe/Amsterdam [CET])
Sun, 06 Mar 2005 05:21:43 +0000 (Europe/London [GMT])
Sun, 06 Mar 2005 02:21:43 -0300 (America/Sao_Paulo [BRT])
Sun, 06 Mar 2005 02:21:43 -0300 (America/Argentina/Buenos_Aires [ART])
Sun, 06 Mar 2005 00:21:43 -0500 (America/New_York [EST])
Sat, 05 Mar 2005 23:21:43 -0600 (America/Chicago [CST])
Sat, 05 Mar 2005 22:21:43 -0700 (America/Denver [MST])
Sat, 05 Mar 2005 21:21:43 -0800 (America/Los_Angeles [PST])
Sat, 05 Mar 2005 19:21:43 -1000 (Pacific/Honolulu [HST])
It's probably democracy breaking out in Clausinky land.
A moderate earthquake occurred at 08:24:47 (UTC) on Sunday, March 6, 2005. The magnitude 5.0 event has been located NORTH OF SEVERNAYA ZEMLYA. (This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.)
|
|
|
|
Have any of the usual clowns showed up to tell us this is nothing unusual?
It's getting a bit tiring. I have something like 4 articles bookmarked that say quake activity is at an unusual level.
On a positive note, it is unlikely that we will have anything near the 9.2 soon. But the fact that there have been many quakes in diverse regions (hell, they had one in Scotland) which are normally not seismically active would give pause to anyone who had a brain.
I mean a brain, not a diploma.
Looking all around... don't see anyone... Hi DJF, no, not yet.
djf wrote: "But the fact that there have been many quakes in diverse regions (hell, they had one in Scotland) which are normally not seismically active would give pause to anyone who had a brain.
I mean a brain, not a diploma."
There are quakes in unusual areas. I didn't see the one in Scotland - if you have the info would you post it please? Did you see that there was a 5.4 quake in Canada - 62 miles from Quebec?
The Scotland event was about a 3.2, around two weeks ago.
So, lately we've had:
an event in Scotland
a 9.2, possibly the second greatest quake ever recorded
events in the NE American sector. True, not unusual by itself, but possibly significant if taken as a whole
the increase in activity at Mt. St. Helens. I know very well about this, because around last March there was a chain of events. Almost weekly, there were 2-3 earthquakes directly beneath the summit at a depth of about 1.8 kilometers.
enough of an increase off the Washington coast for the scientists to send out an explorer ship... but they must be idiots, they're obviously not as smart as U no hoo..
Two devastating earthquakes in Iran
A moderate increase in activity in Siberia
A quake almost directly on the North pole. I think this area is right in the middle of a plate.
But we're all idiots for paying attention to it and asking questions, meanwhile, others who paid attention to it and asked questions and went to school know way more than we do..
Someone should tell them there's a difference. Statistical methods don't work when you are talking something that really follows chaos theory.
Keep me on the ping list, and I will also!
regards,
djf
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.