Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"EVAPORATED:" THE DAN AND DAVE SHOW (Michelle Malkin critiques Dan Rather's Farewell Tour)
Michelle Malkin's Blog ^ | March 4, 2005 | Michelle Malkin

Posted on 03/04/2005 1:10:20 AM PST by Stoat

"EVAPORATED:" THE DAN AND DAVE SHOW

 

By Michelle Malkin   ·   March 04, 2005 01:02 AM

 

Just happen to be on sick baby overnight shift and caught The David Letterman Show, which I never usually watch. MSM relic Dan Rather is on his farewell tour and bloviated for a few segments about his 1968 Democratic National Convention scuffles in Chicago, his Deep Thoughts on Iraq, and, yes, the little "error" (too bad he doesn't read the Wall Street Journal editorial page..."kerfuffle" would have really come in handy) that we have all come to know and love as Rathergate/Memogate/The Bogus Documents Thing.

The quick typers at Ratherbiased.com have an instant transcript already up here. (Update 1:25am: Ratherbiased.com has the video as well.)

Some of the CYA soundbites that jumped out at me while watching:

--Rather mumbling that "for whatever reason rightly or wrongly the focus became the documents."

--His insistence that "George W. Bush was destined to be reelected regardless of what happened in August or September."

--Letterman's weird, repeated use of the word "evaporated" in asserting that the Thornburgh report absolved Rather and company of political bias. (Too bad the Late Night producers didn't include Paul Mirengoff's devastating analysis on this matter in Letterman's show prep.)

--Rather's anemically self-serving defense: "Nobody broke the law. Nobody lied...Depending on your point of view, it was a mistake...and who hasn't made a mistake?

--Both men's unreality-based implication that the bogus documents have not been proven to be the the laughing-stock forgeries that they are, and Rather's insistence that "given more time, perhaps we could have" authenticated the documents.

Bwah-hah-hah-hah!

Letterman seemed uncomfortable. Rather seemed ill at ease. (Before Letterman launched into the Memogate stuff, Rather warbled a bit of "Everything is Beautiful" to poke fun of supporters of the war in Iraq and no one laughed.) Things got really hairy when Letterman needled Rather about Les Moonves' role.

There was, of course, complete silence on the role of blogs in exposing the scandal. And there were no questions from Letterman on the absolute p.r. disaster that CBS and Rather engaged in after the blogosphere blew the whistle on the funny papers. Letterman could have done a great public service by replacing his top ten list and recapping for the audience the top ten defects of CBS/Rather's handling of the story identified by the investigative panel. Drumroll please...

1. The failure to obtain clear authentication of any of the Killian documents from any document examiner;

2. The false statement in the September 8 Segment that an expert had authenticated the Killian documents when all he had done was authenticate one signature from one document used in the Segment;

3. The failure of 60 Minutes Wednesday management to scrutinize the publicly
available, and at times controversial, background of the source of the documents, retired Texas Army National Guard Lieutenant Colonel Bill Burkett;

4. The failure to find and interview the individual who was understood at the outset to be Lieutenant Colonel Burkett's source of the Killian documents, and thus to establish the chain of custody;

5. The failure to establish a basis for the statement in the Segment that the documents "were taken from Colonel Killian's personal files";

6. The failure to develop adequate corroboration to support the statements in the Killian documents and to carefully compare the Killian documents to official TexANG records, which would have identified, at a minimum, notable inconsistencies in content and format;

7. The failure to interview a range of former National Guardsmen who served with Lieutenant Colonel Killian and who had different perspectives about the documents;

8. The misleading impression conveyed in the Segment that Lieutenant Strong had authenticated the content of the documents when he did not have the personal knowledge to do so;

9. The failure to have a vetting process capable of dealing effectively with the
production speed, significance and sensitivity of the Segment; and

10. The telephone call prior to the Segment's airing by the producer of the Segment to a senior campaign official of Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry - a clear conflict of interest - that created the appearance of a political bias.

 

Farewell, Mr. Rather. And good riddance. Based on the icky awkwardness of the interview, I imagine David Letterman feels the very same way.



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: danrather; daveletterman; docugate; letterman; mapesgate; rathergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last


1 posted on 03/04/2005 1:10:20 AM PST by Stoat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Stoat

bump


2 posted on 03/04/2005 1:15:58 AM PST by GeronL (Condi will not be mistaken for a cleaning lady)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat; GeronL
Michelle is great, but somebody needs to tell her that a Letterman-type "Top Ten" list counts down from 10 to 1, not up from 1 to 10.
3 posted on 03/04/2005 1:21:39 AM PST by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

lol..


4 posted on 03/04/2005 1:22:26 AM PST by GeronL (Condi will not be mistaken for a cleaning lady)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

"That all evaporated"...


SNORK!!!!!!!!


5 posted on 03/04/2005 1:46:40 AM PST by Capn TrVth (Yah! A little over the top, but who has more fun? ;>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Knowing the truth, watching Rather slither out is great entertainment.


6 posted on 03/04/2005 1:55:12 AM PST by Glenn (The two keys to character: 1) Learn how to keep a secret. 2) ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

That's because she "never usually" watches. A little lapse of skill there in an always usually decent writer.


7 posted on 03/04/2005 2:26:19 AM PST by NYpeanut (gulping for air, I started crying and yelling at him, "Why did you lie to me?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: snarks_when_bored

Thought the same thing BUMP.


8 posted on 03/04/2005 2:51:47 AM PST by LibertarianInExile (The South will rise again? Hell, we ever get states' rights firmly back in place, the CSA has risen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

In the transcript, I only caught the word "evaporated" twice during the memogate segment and Letterman was the one using it each time.


9 posted on 03/04/2005 2:56:28 AM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

And as I went back and read the article, Michelle did say it was Letterman's word. Sorry MM.


10 posted on 03/04/2005 2:57:41 AM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Michelle. What a gal! Sick baby, and still she has time to skewer Rather and company.


11 posted on 03/04/2005 3:00:39 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

I saw most of it..the lack of applause for Rather was telling..he also looked almost , well, pathetic...


12 posted on 03/04/2005 3:26:00 AM PST by ken5050 (The Dem party is as dead as the NHL..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
I actually caught about 15 seconds of those two last night as I was channel surfing... When I heard Leterman say (something like) "well, they didn't prove that the documents were legitimate, but they didn't prove that they were fake, either..." At that point, I had heard enough.

Over and over again, the MSM reminds me of a line from the John Landis film "Amazon Women on the Moon." "Using undiscovered evidence, we now know that Jack the Ripper was really the Loch Ness Monster!"

Mark

13 posted on 03/04/2005 3:40:57 AM PST by MarkL (That which does not kill me, has made the last mistake it will ever make!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

14 posted on 03/04/2005 3:41:51 AM PST by Diogenesis (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Why are all the smart, good-looking women conservative? Just a rhetorical question - no answer required.
15 posted on 03/04/2005 3:42:01 AM PST by Malesherbes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Malesherbes

I got an answer to your rhetorical question.
'Cause beauty's more than skin deep.


16 posted on 03/04/2005 4:08:45 AM PST by GrannyAnnie (as right as I can be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

I saw your ping about deciding whether to watch Rather or Stewart. In case you watched Stewart, you'll want to read this.


17 posted on 03/04/2005 4:57:18 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYpeanut

Giving Michelle a break......having been on sick baby overnight duty myself a time or two.


18 posted on 03/04/2005 5:09:01 AM PST by OldFriend (America's glory is not dominion, but liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

With mapes marketing her book and this apparent cya fest on letterman, it appears the official talking point is going to be "fake but true".

Letterman has been in second place of the two man race for how many years?


19 posted on 03/04/2005 7:11:12 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Note Rather's:
"We were not able to authenticate the documents as thoroughly as I think we should have, given a little more time perhaps we could have." [emphasis mine]

Given a little more time for what? If they needed more time to get to the truth why didn't they take it? The only reason Rather would say such a thing is because they were not interersted in the truth, there was an election coming up, and they were running out of time to influence the outcome.

Cordially,

20 posted on 03/04/2005 7:16:58 AM PST by Diamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson