Posted on 03/04/2005 1:10:20 AM PST by Stoat
"EVAPORATED:" THE DAN AND DAVE SHOW
By Michelle Malkin · March 04, 2005 01:02 AM
Just happen to be on sick baby overnight shift and caught The David Letterman Show, which I never usually watch. MSM relic Dan Rather is on his farewell tour and bloviated for a few segments about his 1968 Democratic National Convention scuffles in Chicago, his Deep Thoughts on Iraq, and, yes, the little "error" (too bad he doesn't read the Wall Street Journal editorial page..."kerfuffle" would have really come in handy) that we have all come to know and love as Rathergate/Memogate/The Bogus Documents Thing.
The quick typers at Ratherbiased.com have an instant transcript already up here. (Update 1:25am: Ratherbiased.com has the video as well.) Some of the CYA soundbites that jumped out at me while watching: --Rather mumbling that "for whatever reason rightly or wrongly the focus became the documents." --His insistence that "George W. Bush was destined to be reelected regardless of what happened in August or September." --Letterman's weird, repeated use of the word "evaporated" in asserting that the Thornburgh report absolved Rather and company of political bias. (Too bad the Late Night producers didn't include Paul Mirengoff's devastating analysis on this matter in Letterman's show prep.) --Rather's anemically self-serving defense: "Nobody broke the law. Nobody lied...Depending on your point of view, it was a mistake...and who hasn't made a mistake? --Both men's unreality-based implication that the bogus documents have not been proven to be the the laughing-stock forgeries that they are, and Rather's insistence that "given more time, perhaps we could have" authenticated the documents. Bwah-hah-hah-hah! Letterman seemed uncomfortable. Rather seemed ill at ease. (Before Letterman launched into the Memogate stuff, Rather warbled a bit of "Everything is Beautiful" to poke fun of supporters of the war in Iraq and no one laughed.) Things got really hairy when Letterman needled Rather about Les Moonves' role. There was, of course, complete silence on the role of blogs in exposing the scandal. And there were no questions from Letterman on the absolute p.r. disaster that CBS and Rather engaged in after the blogosphere blew the whistle on the funny papers. Letterman could have done a great public service by replacing his top ten list and recapping for the audience the top ten defects of CBS/Rather's handling of the story identified by the investigative panel. Drumroll please... 1. The failure to obtain clear authentication of any of the Killian documents from any document examiner;
Farewell, Mr. Rather. And good riddance. Based on the icky awkwardness of the interview, I imagine David Letterman feels the very same way. |
bump
lol..
"That all evaporated"...
SNORK!!!!!!!!
Knowing the truth, watching Rather slither out is great entertainment.
That's because she "never usually" watches. A little lapse of skill there in an always usually decent writer.
Thought the same thing BUMP.
In the transcript, I only caught the word "evaporated" twice during the memogate segment and Letterman was the one using it each time.
And as I went back and read the article, Michelle did say it was Letterman's word. Sorry MM.
Michelle. What a gal! Sick baby, and still she has time to skewer Rather and company.
I saw most of it..the lack of applause for Rather was telling..he also looked almost , well, pathetic...
Over and over again, the MSM reminds me of a line from the John Landis film "Amazon Women on the Moon." "Using undiscovered evidence, we now know that Jack the Ripper was really the Loch Ness Monster!"
Mark
I got an answer to your rhetorical question.
'Cause beauty's more than skin deep.
I saw your ping about deciding whether to watch Rather or Stewart. In case you watched Stewart, you'll want to read this.
Giving Michelle a break......having been on sick baby overnight duty myself a time or two.
With mapes marketing her book and this apparent cya fest on letterman, it appears the official talking point is going to be "fake but true".
Letterman has been in second place of the two man race for how many years?
"We were not able to authenticate the documents as thoroughly as I think we should have, given a little more time perhaps we could have." [emphasis mine]
Given a little more time for what? If they needed more time to get to the truth why didn't they take it? The only reason Rather would say such a thing is because they were not interersted in the truth, there was an election coming up, and they were running out of time to influence the outcome.
Cordially,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.