Posted on 03/01/2005 7:07:17 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
MOSCOW (AP) - Russia will develop missiles impervious to any defense, Defense Minister Sergei Ivanov said Tuesday in an apparent allusion the nascent U.S. missile defense system.
A year ago, President Vladimir Putin said Russia could build unrivaled new strategic weapons, and in November he said it is developing a new nuclear missile system unlike any weapon other countries have or could come up with in the near future.
Ivanov suggested the weapons would be based on the mobile version of the Russian Topol-M intercontinental ballistic missiles and on a new sea-based system, the Bulava, according to Interfax news agency.
"There is not and will not be any defense against these missiles," he said, according to Interfax.
The Topol-M can hit targets more than 6,000 miles away, and has been in silos since 1998, with about 40 on duty now, according to military officials. Military officials have said they plan to begin deploying the mobile version this year.
Ivanov said the missiles would be for defense and not be intended for use against any country, but he added that "Russia is stretched across 10 times zones, we have many neighbors, and not all of them are as predictable as European states," according to Interfax.
In December, Putin encouraged the Defense Ministry to keep up production of new strategic missile systems, a process slowed in the past by a shortage of funds.
"Russia will ... remain a major nuclear power," Ivanov said, according to Interfax. "But we will not bake missiles like pies. Their quantity should be such that it allows for the provision of our own security in any potential development of the international situation."
Russia opposed Washington's withdrawal in 2002 from the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty in order to deploy a national missile defense shield, saying the 30-year-old U.S.-Soviet pact was a key element of international security.
Russian officials subsequently tempered their criticism. Putin said it was a "mistake" that would hurt global security but not threaten Russia.
The ABM treaty banned missile defense systems on the assumption that the fear of retaliation would prevent each nation from launching a first strike - a strategy known as mutually assured destruction.
The Bush administration has said its prospective missile defense system would be aimed against potential missile threats from nations such as Iraq or North Korea, and would be unable to fend off a massive nuclear strike Russia is capable of launching.
--
Maybe its paranoia? Putin's recent comments on CBS Rathergate already show he's not in touch with the real world. Putin may really think we intend to bully him with threats of a launch when we have our shield? Weird.
Hey! LOL. Well like minds are great...
The warheads will be going mach 15 at top speed. What they are doing I think is trading off the MIRVs for an advanced evasion system designed to get one warhead (per missile) through an ABM defense. This could be overcome with SBL (space based lasers) or nuclear ABMs. Something like Brilliant Pebbles with an SBL component would be impervious to their "impervious missile."
In some ways, Mach 10/hypervelocity missile is actually easier to intercept, if we have sea or ground based interceptors in the right place. Because of the speed, deploying countermeasures from the missile becomes a problem. And going that fast, the thing can't do much by way of evasive manuvers. And of course the added velocity will magnify the damage when something hits it.
I would very much appreciate a link to that.
Maybe it's not us that they are trying to impress?
The faster a missile travels through the air the greater the pressure upon the missile by the atmosphere. If it's doing Mach 15 then slight damage to it could destroy it. The ABL can punch a basketball sized hole in a regular missile. I doubt this system could survive that.
This guy is utterly delusional. If he does not know about the unlimited power of the American engineering and technology then he is a complete fool. He needs to know that it is an impossibility that any nation on this planet can have any technology in any area that can be superior to ours.
Well, that's when you'll hear the leftists try to explain how a completely defensive weapon (BMD) is aggressive and how obvious offensive strike weapons (actual nuclear tipped missiles) are defensive.
Right, our defense was never intended for a large number of missiles, (which Russia has) so they don't need to do much, just overwhelm us. We could stop a single rogue launch, and the countermeasure game is one that we play too, so its tough to predict success on either side. Hitting a non-evading missile is quite a trick, but the easy counter measures have been accounted for as well.
forgive me for asking, but why is russia so focused on this?
i may be wrong, but i doubt that europe has militaristic goals with russia. nor the united states. china? who knows.
What is that .... thing?
Putin should know this, unless he is a paranoid lunatic. Maybe the second coming of Ivan the Terrible? Maybe its just something for the Chinese to consider?
If the Chinese were to steal or buy the technology once it is perfected, the Russians would have more to fear from them than us.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/commentary/20050228-084038-9858r.htm
Search FR for other posts about it, too.
Just some silliness I found on the web. I found it very appropriate. One thing you can always count on is Russia being Russia. Putin is a paper tiger and I don't see him doing all that much. It's like every now and then he has a KGB flashback . Once a Communist always a Communist.
Those warheads are pretty hardened. They certainly couldn't take a direct hit by a kinetic kill vehicle but might or might not survive a near miss by a conventional ABM. The ABL has stabilization issues that are trying to be overcome. The main worry about lasers is that they could polish the surface to a mirror-like gloss to reflect the laser-shine or they could rotate it. To be honest I don't know if they could actually rotate a missile effectively enough to reduce laser-shine or how powerful the laser would need to be to oversome such countermeasures. But frankly that stuff is a long way off if ever (Is anyone worried if the N.Koreans can rotate their mirrored missiles?). The fact is a deployment of off the shelf SBL technology right now would be a strong deterrent.
Anything that man can build and deploy, man can defeat.
Putin either doesn't know history, or he's ignorant of human nature.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.