Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leaking Gravity May Explain Cosmic Puzzle
SPACE.com ^ | February 28, 2005 | Sara Goudarzi

Posted on 02/28/2005 6:29:00 PM PST by AntiGuv

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Scientists may not have to go over to the dark side to explain the fate of the universe.

The theory that the accelerated expansion of the universe is caused by mysterious "dark energy" is being challenged by New York University physicist Georgi Dvali. He thinks there's just a gravity leak.

Scientists have known since the 1920s that the universe is expanding. In the late 1990s, they realized that it is expanding at an ever-increasing pace. At a loss to explain the stunning discovery, cosmologists blamed it on dark energy, a newly coined term to describe the mysterious antigravity force apparently pushing galaxies outward.

This repulsive, unknown force is believed to make up more than 70 percent of the mass-energy budget of the universe.

But the existence of dark energy is far from proven, and some researchers believe they and their colleagues simply don't understand gravity at larger scales. The gravitational pull between any two objects becomes less with distance. But in Dvali's view, it weakens more than standard theory predicts.

Dvali would modify the theory of gravity so that the universe becomes self-accelerating, eliminating the need for dark energy. He presented his work here earlier this month at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Dvali borrows from string theory, which states that there are extra, hidden dimensions beyond the four we are familiar with: three directions and time. String theory suggests that gravitons -- hypothetical elementary particles transmitting gravitational forces -- can escape to other dimensions. Dvali says this would cause "leaks" in gravity over cosmic proportions, reducing gravitational pull at larger distances more than expected.

"The gravitons behave like sound in a metal sheet," says Dvali. "Hitting the sheet with a hammer creates a sound wave that travels along its surface. But the sound propagation is not exactly two-dimensional as part of the energy is lost into the surrounding air. Near the hammer, the loss of energy is small, but further away, it's more significant."

The effect is to alter the space-time continuum, speeding up universal expansion.

"Virtual gravitons exploit every possible route between the objects," Dvali said, "and the leakage opens up a huge number of multi-dimensional detours, which brings about a change in the law of gravity."

The speeding up of the universe suggest that Einstein’s laws of General Relativity, describing the interaction of space and matter, must be modified at large cosmic distances.

"It is this modification, and not dark energy, that is responsible for the accelerated expansion of the universe," Dvali concludes.

The idea might be testable.

Gravity leakage should create minor deviations in the motion of planets and moons. Astronauts on the Apollo 11 mission installed mirrors on the lunar surface. By shooting lasers at the mirrors, a reflected beam can be monitored from Earth to measure tiny orbital fluctuations. Dvali said deviations in the Moon's path around Earth might reveal whether gravity is really leaking away.

This article is part of SPACE.com's weekly Mystery Monday series.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: astrophysics; darkenergy; gravity; leaking; physics; relativity; science; spacetime; stringtheory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: mad_as_he$$

Dvali would modify the theory of gravity so that the universe becomes self-accelerating, eliminating the need for dark energy

I'll modify the theory of everything. That shows, of course that I'm right. Of Course. About everything.

Gad


61 posted on 03/01/2005 7:17:06 PM PST by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Junior
Speaking from personal experience, I take it? ;^)>

Not yet. Just anticipating.

62 posted on 03/01/2005 7:29:03 PM PST by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: stacytec

First, let me thank you for a remarkably restrained and measured reply to what must surely have been an outrageous post. I'm violating one of the number one rules of astronomy - positing that we are observing a unique time in the history of the universe.

I'm wondering, what if the reversal took place in extremely recent times, say, the last several thousand years. We'd still be catching the light from galaxies that were outbound, but we ourselves are inbound. But what about the nearest galaxies? Andromeda, for example. What is their relative motion? Have we tried to explain any aberrant motion by saying they are part of a local group? What if they're actually falling in with us?

Again, wild, outrageous speculation - the kind that makes you want to go out and drink.


63 posted on 03/01/2005 7:43:47 PM PST by SlowBoat407 (Bekaa to the future!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: sasquatch

As usual! FWIW where does gravity leak too? The cosmic septic tank?


64 posted on 03/01/2005 8:00:00 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: lafroste

Yes it was green and in the 20 watt range as I recall. Bench made from stuff collected at various Silicon Valley establishments. We had to water cool it to keep it working for any period of time.


65 posted on 03/01/2005 8:02:05 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Never corner anything meaner than you. NSDQ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: SlowBoat407

If its true that nearby galaxies are moving away from us at 80 (km/sec)/megaparsec and we assume that action is "expansion", I would expect to see a slowdown over a much greater period of before gravity tugged the strings in. Then again, I was always partial to the flat earth on the back of a tortoise idea.


66 posted on 03/01/2005 8:07:10 PM PST by stacytec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

I still don't get it. How does gravity leaking into other dimensions explain the acceleration in the expansion of the Universe? It seems to me that still leaves something "repulsive" to be accounted for.


67 posted on 03/01/2005 8:14:26 PM PST by Nick Danger (The only way out is through)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA

It keeps missing.


68 posted on 03/01/2005 8:24:10 PM PST by Boiler Plate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Quite right. We don't know, yet.


69 posted on 03/02/2005 8:47:28 AM PST by RightWhale (Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

from 2005

70 posted on 07/04/2007 3:53:31 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (This tagline optimized for the Mosaic browser. Profile updated Wednesday, July 4, 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson