This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
Locked on 03/17/2005 6:00:56 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
New thread: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1365111/posts |
Posted on 02/28/2005 7:08:08 AM PST by floriduh voter
Ouch!
Here's what George Felos is saying about Terri's money. Hint: He's lying!
http://www.shns.com/shns/g_index2.cfm?action=detail&pk=ERBE-03-14-05
This is super great news!
YOUR ARTICLE: ""March 18, 2005 Editorial
Accuracy, teaching should enlighten Schiavo case ""
I'm sorry but someone NEEDS TO TEAR THIS EDITORIAL APART.
It's filled with ERRORS AND THE WORD * ACCURACY * SHOULD NOT BE ANY WHERE NEAR IT.
It states Terri wanted to be denied Food and Water. That was illegal when Terri had her mis-fortune. Terri is NOT PVS.
Why do people NOT realize that the Supreme Court of FL didn't look at the evidence, but just threw it back to Judge Greer, not realizing the man WAS NOT A JUDGE.
There's NO clear and conveniencing evidence Terri would want to be Murdered.
End of critic by me.
I did not know this. On what basis did Greer dismiss Gambone's testimony? (Not that he ever needed reasons.)
Citizens' arrests are only for felonies, and the execution of Terri is a "civil" matter, not even ranking up to a Class C misdemeanor! So low is human life regarded in FL and the USA now.
Actually, the arrest warrant states the Florida Statutes in violation that become felonies.
For example: if I divorce my husband, that is a civil action, then he comes to my house and kills me and takes the kids, then it becomes a felony.
This is really no different. This is murder under color of law, the worst civil rights violation.
The line from civil to criminal has been crossed way before this point.
Actually I need to clarify one of my sentences.
I meant to say that the divorce would be a civil action, if he kills me afterward, it becomes a crime.
Scott Peterson was given the death sentence for killing his wife today. He didn't go about it the right way, did he? He should have taken a few pointers from Michael </sarcasm>
Thomas Horkan Jr. is executive director emeritus of the Florida Catholic Conference.
Perhaps the Pope or the Cardinals could call this guy and straighten him out.
"The District Court of Appeals subsequently entered its final ruling, which to my mind was a very pro-life ruling, reaffirming that this was in fact Terri Schiavo's decision, not her husband's nor anyone else's; secondly, as to her condition, it affirmed the decision of the trial court that she was in a persistent vegetative state. The ruling, which eloquently reflects its care, diligence and deep personal interest in this case, can be found on the Internet at www.2DCA.org. Click on the Opinion button, then go to 2003, then June, then June 6, 2003, then Schindler v. Schiavo."
How is killing Terri "pro-life"?
Just as he accuses Terri's supporters, he is conveniently leaving out the facts of this case that don't support his arguments.
Denying nutrition with intent to cause harm is FELONY Aggravated Manslsughter of Disabled Person 782.08
The Attempt when you use 777 to attach makes it Felony 1 which is 30 to Life.
Congressman Dennis Cardoza will not support HR1151. He thinks it's hunkie dorie to starve Terri to death starting Friday.
Got a phone number for that Congressman Saundra?? I'd like to voice my strong feelings!!!!!!!!!!!!11
Thanks for bringing to my attention. I posted the article,I haven't had time to read it.
Just because the order is coming out of a civil court (Greer et al hide behind this one) does not mean that it reduces murder to anything civil.
Good Lord! This man makes me proud(er) to be an American!
What moral fiber!
It's like WWJWD - What Would John Wayne Do? LOL!
Just look at that chest full of medals!
Because I'm the Judge and I say so....nananana boo boo.
Doesn't the idiocy of these people boggle your mind? It's ok to starve some one and proclaim to be prolife? My brain hurts. ( Don't get excited prodeathpeople, my family won't starve me just because I have a headache).
I really don't think it matters what Dennis Cardoza thinks in this situation. Is he from CA? The problem will be getting it through the Senate. Won't the rules have to be suspended to get it to the floor, and if this is not done on Thursday, the Senate won't meet again until when???? With Easter coming up, senators may not resume "business" until March 29. They normally work a three-day week.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.