Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Assault weapons battle rejoined (Feinswine)
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 2-26-05 | Edward Epstein

Posted on 02/26/2005 5:25:12 PM PST by Dan from Michigan

Assault weapons battle rejoined
Feinstein fights to reinstate law that expired after 10 years
Edward Epstein, Chronicle Washington Bureau

Saturday, February 26, 2005

Washington -- California Sen. Dianne Feinstein renewed one of Washington's long- running and most bitterly fought battles Friday, saying she will introduce legislation seeking to reinstate the federal assault weapons ban that expired in September after 10 years.

Gun control has been a signature issue for Feinstein since she arrived in the Senate in 1993. But the odds she faces to pass the weapons ban in the current Congress are probably steeper than they were in 1993, when the Senate narrowly approved the ban, or last March, when it passed 52-47 before dying in the body.

(snip)

"We're cautiously optimistic,'' said National Rifle Association spokesman Andrew Arulanandam, that the Feinstein bill won't pass the Senate this year. "But we recognize the fact that this is Washington, D.C., and we take nothing for granted.''

(snip)

In disclosing her decision, Feinstein cited the shooting deaths Thursday of two Los Angeles city workers by a co-worker apparently armed with an AK-47 rifle as an example of why the law is needed.

"Once again, we've seen the tragic consequence of the ready availability of assault weapons throughout our society,'' she said.
(snip)

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: awb; bang; banglist; difi; doa; feinstein; feinswine; freedomgrabbers; gungrabbers; uglygunban
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
Here we go again.
1 posted on 02/26/2005 5:25:13 PM PST by Dan from Michigan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

Not a singler piece of Democrat-sponsored legislation should see the light of day until each and every one of President Bush's judicial nominees has received an up-or-down vote in the senate.


2 posted on 02/26/2005 5:28:02 PM PST by Mad_Tom_Rackham (This just in from CBS: "There is no bias at CBS")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham

That's a good idea.


3 posted on 02/26/2005 5:31:33 PM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Dan from Michigan

We'll just put that in the STFU file for now, mmmmmmkay?


5 posted on 02/26/2005 5:36:19 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolf24

we'll see......I'm betting that what some of the Repub pundits said is true......we didn't want to use the "nuclear option" last few years cause Bush didn't really have a mandate.......now that he has won a 2nd time and also the popular vote, I'm sure they will go nuclear this time if the Dems filibuster....


6 posted on 02/26/2005 5:44:07 PM PST by NorCalRepub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

She's supposed to be a smart woman but she has stupidly concluded that these too shooting victims are somehow more dead than they would have been had some other type of weapon had been used.


7 posted on 02/26/2005 7:16:34 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolf24
To bad spines and Repbulicans it seems rarely go together these days.

Someone needs to tell the Republicans that even jellyfish, though spineless, can sting.

8 posted on 02/26/2005 7:30:08 PM PST by Wilhelm Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan; Southack
I'm just going to call them what they are, enslavers. These leftists just want everyone enslaved by government.

We need to launch a liberation front, we need to bring freedom's truth to the masses!!

Stop the slavers. Emancipate the people.

9 posted on 02/26/2005 8:59:08 PM PST by GeronL (Condi will not be mistaken for a cleaning lady)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
"Sen. Dianne Feinstein renewed one of Washington's long- running and most bitterly fought battles Friday, saying she will introduce legislation seeking to..."

Democratic legislation is persona non grata as far as I'm concerned. The minority Party has no business trying to wag the whole Senate dog.

No doubt that good man Hastert will see that the House never touches such Democrat-tainted garbage, either.

10 posted on 02/26/2005 9:19:32 PM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

Pittsburgh Tribune-Review

Elementary deduction

Monday, January 17, 2005

Sherlock Holmes could teach deductive reasoning to the National Academy of Sciences.

Holmes, the quintessential detective created by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, knew that by eliminating all other factors, the remaining one must be the truth.

An NAS panel created during the Clinton administration -- and infested with gun-grabbers -- issued a 328-page report on gun control. It studied hundreds of articles, books, government publications, gun-control laws and its own empirical work.

But its exhaustive study -- analyzing the former ban on so-called assault weapons, the Brady Act, one-gun-a-month buying restrictions and gun locks -- could not identify any benefits of gun control.

Crime was not reduced. Accidents were not lessened.

But after studying each specific issue, the panel's inductive reasoning only concluded that more study was needed.

Citizens in more than 30 states may carry concealed weapons legally. If they were injuring others or themselves, it surely would have produced front-page, above-the-fold stories with screaming, large-type headlines.

Mr. Holmes also knew what silence could say. Because the guard dog did not bark in "Silver Blaze," Holmes easily deduced the truth about a horse thief.

Since the panel's findings leave proponents speechless, deducing the truth about gun control is just as easy. Elementary, actually.

-- from http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/tribune-review/opinion/archive/s_293242.html


11 posted on 02/26/2005 10:28:30 PM PST by FreeKeys ("God created men and women in all sizes, but it was Samuel Colt who made them all equal."- old adage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

Up yours, Demonrats. None of YOUR bills are passing until at least 2008.


12 posted on 02/26/2005 11:07:09 PM PST by Malleus Dei ("Communists are just Democrats in a hurry.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan; Mo1; Howlin; Peach; BeforeISleep; kimmie7; 4integrity; BigSkyFreeper; ...
BANG!!!


13 posted on 02/28/2005 12:16:20 PM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan; Joe Brower
November's election increased the 100-member Senate's number of Republicans from 51 to 55, and there are at least four new solid votes against Feinstein's proposal.

Do they even have the votes?

Back on March 2, 2004 the vote was


YEAs 52
NAYs 47
Not Voting 1

To extend the AWB, Remember the amendment passed.....

Now after the election and w/ 4 new repubs how will the voting go?

14 posted on 02/28/2005 12:23:35 PM PST by OXENinFLA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AAABEST; wku man; SLB; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; The Old Hoosier; xrp; freedomlover; ...
Some things just never change.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

15 posted on 02/28/2005 1:13:46 PM PST by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

This is just a posturing introduction.

Why don't the democrats just cut the BS and introduce bills to

Outlaw unhapiness
Outlaw rich people
Outlaw mean people
Outlaw anyone who does not agree with feminists
or
Make a law which says the DNC platform is mandatory thought.


16 posted on 02/28/2005 1:15:53 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
The Dems have been screaming about how Bush is resubmitting nominees who were rejected by the Senate last year.

Not a one of them was rejected by the Senate. They'd simply never been voted on.

Fine.

Bush should inform the Senate that at the beginning of every recess, each and every nominee who had been approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee more than 90 days prior, and who had not received an up or down vote by the full Senate, will be recess appointed.

And then renominated at the beginning of the next session.

If the Senate rejects a nominee, the President should honor that, and not use his recess appointment power to try to circumvent it. But if the Senate had not rejected a nominee, but simply had not yet voted on him, the President would be fully justified in using his recess appointment power to temporarily fill the position.

17 posted on 02/28/2005 1:39:35 PM PST by jdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
PREDICTED
There is a meeting of ani-gunners. This is followed by a 1 to 2 month hatius. Then there is a well publicied killing involving a gun. One or 2 weeks later, there is a second shooting. Then....An entire month goes by. Then BLAM. Within days an all out full frontal attack on the second amendment.

Predicted. Predicted. Predicted.

18 posted on 02/28/2005 1:40:34 PM PST by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
The RATs never change their spots on trying to destroy the 2nd and the whole damn Republic along with it. They truly are the Evil Party - the party that wants to subjugate the entire citizenry and by extension, control 100% of the GDP.An armed citizenry would make that sort of government impossible, so the FIRST order of business for all tyrants: DISARM THE PEOPLE.

My advice is not to drag one's feet; if you want an AR or related weapon and the standard magazines to go with it, get it now - do not delay - because who knows what the future holds. The RATs are down, but they are not out.

19 posted on 02/28/2005 2:16:57 PM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

I wouldn't doubt that a Republican put her up to is just to keep the money flowing from the NRA. Okay, I'm only kidding. Sort of.


20 posted on 02/28/2005 2:25:15 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (God is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson