Posted on 02/26/2005 5:08:38 AM PST by billorites
Like a high mountain road posted with danger signs, Ward Churchill's career has been marked by repeated warnings to University of Colorado officials that there could be serious trouble ahead.
CU has been contacted a number of times over the past 20 years by prominent figures within the American Indian community who have raised questions about Churchill's truthfulness, his scholarship and his ethnicity.
Churchill responded Wednesday night that CU had conducted thorough investigations of each complaint over the years.
"I came out as clean as a hound's tooth," he said.
David Bradley, a Santa Fe-area American Indian artist whose feud with Churchill has endured more than a decade, says he told CU a long time ago that Churchill should be fired.
"If his bosses had simply done their jobs, if they had checked him out, if they had started reading his damn writing, they would have said, 'Wait a minute! This falls below our standards,' " Bradley said.
"If they had, he wouldn't have tenure. It was a failure every step of the way."
Churchill has been under fire for an essay he wrote on the 9/11 terrorist attacks. In "Some People Push Back: On the Justice of Roosting Chickens," Churchill called many of the victims "little Eichmanns" who were complicit in mass murder. The CU Board of Regents has ordered an investigation of Churchill's works and activities.
Bradley says he is the first to have blown the whistle on Churchill, whom he criticizes on many counts, including his belief that Churchill has no legitimate claim to American Indian status. But by the time he contacted CU in 1994, several other Churchill critics had a clear head start in bringing their complaints to CU.
Vernon Bellecourt, an American Indian Movement activist, says he first approached the university with questions about the veracity of Churchill's claim to American Indian heritage in 1986.
"We went out there with a stack of documents to tell them about him," Bellecourt said. "I made a special trip to Colorado and went to the university. I tried to meet with the president of the Board of Regents."
Bellecourt says none of the regents was willing to talk to him, and instead sent an employee to meet with him. He says he gave her all the documentation and never heard from them again.
"We were really frustrated when we left," Bellecourt said. "We said, 'At least we warned them.' "
Claim to be Indian challenged
Bellecourt continued to raise the issue of Churchill's American Indian background over the next few years, contacting the university again in 1994. That year, several others joined him and wrote letters about Churchill to then-CU President Judith Albino, saying that Churchill was fraudulently claiming to be an American Indian.
"We told the university he wasn't Indian and was disruptive in the community," said Carole Standing Elk, a California Indian activist. "We said, 'He doesn't represent us, and how did you put him in the ethnic studies department?' "
Albino referred the matter to former CU Boulder Chancellor James Corbridge. In a letter to Standing Elk, Corbridge said the university had reviewed Churchill's claims to be an American Indian but could not make that an issue in his employment.
"The university has taken your concerns very seriously," wrote Corbridge. "However, given the fact that equal opportunity is the law of the land and that positions in the public sector are to be awarded to all persons regardless of race, color, religion, sex or national origin, and based only on their ability to do the job, the university does not believe that any attempt to remove Mr. Churchill because of his ethnicity or race would be appropriate.
"Even if Mr. Churchill is not an American Indian, as he claims, Title VII protects Caucasians as well as persons of color. Further, it has always been university policy that a person's race or ethnicity is self-proving."
Corbridge went on to say that the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission had taken the position that "observation and self-identification are the most reliable indicators of one's racial grouping."
Meanwhile, other prominent American Indians were challenging Churchill's claim of American Indian ancestry. They insist Churchill would not have his job if he hadn't said he was an Indian.
"I sent a letter to the university in 1992 saying he's not a native person," said Suzan Shown Harjo, president of the Morning Star Institute. She says she received a response from a university official saying Churchill had not been hired because he was an American Indian.
Harjo, the former executive director of the National Congress of American Indians, says that is nonsense.
"He was interviewed and hired because he said he's an American Indian," she said. "The material he used to gain tenure says he's an American Indian. If he were Ward Churchill, white man, they would not have made him chair of ethnic studies."
CU 'aided and abetted his deception'
Harjo says CU is complicit in the uproar over Churchill, since the university has given him a platform that he has used to attack others.
"He's lied to the university and they've passed him off as an Indian," she said. "They've aided and abetted his deception. The university needs to accept its role in this and do something about it."
Churchill has insisted in interviews that he is at least one-sixteenth Cherokee and Creek, but family tree researchers have verified only white branches. Since 1974 he has been an associate member of the Tahlequah, Okla.-based Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians. The tribe has said that his membership was honorary and required no proof of Cherokee heritage.
In a prior interview with the News, Churchill bristled when asked about those who question his lineage.
"Suzan Harjo is no more entitled to interrogate me on that score than your average fellow bureaucrat," Churchill said. "And my non-responsiveness to her specific questions, when she tries to conduct her inquisitions, has been basically 'Kiss my ---.' It's a typical ad hominem attack. And the question is, what has it got to do with anything?"
Bellecourt and Harjo say Churchill's belligerent speeches and writings are evidence that he is not of American Indian descent. They say Indians usually avoid the confrontational behavior Churchill is known for.
"You've seen his demeanor, his arrogance; that's not the Indian way," said Bellecourt. "We're a compassionate people, that's always been a trait of Indians."
Harjo met Churchill at a conference in 1990 and says she was immediately suspicious of his background.
"There was nothing in his manner or appearance or his way of relating that made me think I was dealing with an American Indian," she said. "He's not a native person. He's a white man."
The issue of whether Churchill is really an American Indian is important, Harjo says, because the point of programs like American Indian studies is to give voice to a community that has long been neglected.
"We're trying to get authentic voices heard and read," said Harjo. "Churchill tries to co-opt our history. He lifts stuff from native cultures and passes it off as his own."
She says Churchill is known in the Indian world for his bitter attacks on prominent people in their community.
"He's attacked me in his books," said Harjo. "He's been burning and slashing through Indian country. Talk about chickens coming home to roost."
Deceased wife's sister among critics
Bradley, a Chippewa, said there are several reasons he and Churchill clashed. One is that Bradley landed a post at the Institute of American Indian Arts as an instructor and guest artist in residence from 1990 to 1992. It was a post for which Churchill had interviewed, said Bradley.
Also pivotal to the Bradley-Churchill feud is Bradley's support for the 1990 American Indian Arts and Crafts Act, which prohibits an artist who is not American Indian from representing his or her work as American Indian art when trying to sell it.
In 1994, Bradley contacted CU, lodging his complaint with Evelyn Hu-De-Hart, then director for CU's Center for Studies of Ethnicity and Race in America.
"I made the same argument it's always been," Bradley said. "One, that he's a fake Indian. Number two, he's a bully and a terrorist, and number three, he's writing ugly lies and slander about me, and the school is giving him a power base to publish these lies about me.
"He probably wouldn't even get that stuff published if he didn't have that cloak of credibility as a professor. They're enabling him, in other words."
Hu-De-Hart's assistant, Bradley said, "told me that complaints were being taken, and that's about it. Nothing of substance was told to me."
Rhonda Kelly, 41, of Winnipeg, the older sister of Churchill's deceased third wife, Leah Renae Kelly, also contacted CU.
Leah Kelly was hit by a car while walking on Arapahoe Road near the couple's home east of Boulder the night of May 31, 2000. She was found to have a blood alcohol content of 0.35, more than three times the level of legal intoxication in Colorado.
Churchill later published a book of Kelly's writings, In My Own Voice. In a lengthy preface, he contended that the American Indian woman's alcoholism and other personal troubles could be traced back to her parents' having been forced, like many indigenous people, into "residential schools" or "Indian schools" intended to speed their assimilation into white culture.
Rhonda Kelly, a second-year law student, has produced a 15-point brief of inaccuracies she said she has found in Churchill's preface. She has asked the book's publisher to remove it from circulation, and to ask a man writing a screenplay based on the book to desist.
Kelly's complaints include her contention that only her father was educated at a residential school and Churchill's misstating the name of the Denver hospital to which Leah Kelly's body was taken.
Churchill, she said, never contacted family members to verify biographical family details included in his preface.
But Churchill said Wednesday evening that it was Rhonda Kelly who wasn't clear on the facts. He said Rhonda Kelly "never had time to come out and visit" her sister. He said he "finished the book living with her parents" and "talked at great lengths" with both of them. If anything was incorrect, they were "small errors," he said.
Churchill disputes allegations
Rhonda Kelly said she "would like to see this book removed from circulation just because it is an inaccurate portrayal of my family. It makes spurious, false allegations about my father and my people. It is inexplainable why this happened."
Kelly, who is Ojibway, said her sister, a May 2000 graduate of CU, told her that she suffered "psychological abuse" during her marriage to Churchill. She described him as exhibiting "very controlling behaviors."
But Churchill said people who know both he and his late wife "know exactly the opposite is true."
"I don't see how it would have been humanly possible for that relationship to have been any more the exact opposite of that description," he said.
He said his wife was a victim of acute alcoholism and that he "fought a long and lonely battle to save her."
Churchill, in the wake of Leah Kelly's death, established a fund at CU for Rhonda Kelly's two children and contributed $200. Rhonda Kelly last summer wrote a letter to CU's financial aid office asking that the money be earmarked for a "promising native woman who was or is involved in an abusive relationship. I wish that such an award can assist a woman to leave an abusive relationship before her spirit is broken, as was the case of my sister Leah.
"My sister Leah Renae Kelly had so much promise, but she was involved in an emotionally and mentally abusive marriage, and as a result of feeling that she could not seek real help for fear of having others know of her predicament, she instead turned to alcohol to escape the torment and humiliation in her marital home."
Rhonda Kelly never received an acknowledgment from CU of that letter or her request.
CU financial aid officials Wednesday said they could not comment on Rhonda Kelly's letter.
We should not be distracted by the silly tempest over Ward Churchill. The real problem, God help us, is that most institutions of "higher learning" are thoroughly riddled with radicals who are indoctrinating the next generation.
yeah, if any husband is this cheap, well he deserves more than hell. Is his book in print?
It certainly worked in Colorado.
You have a very astute and analytical way of distilling the essences from these scenarios. I find your premise well constructed and highly likely.
Right. Churchill is the tip of a very ugly iceberg.
Note in the article how his Indianess is regarded as a unique qualification for the job. That no white man would have gotten this job. Now that part amazes me. What is a white man was the best, most knowledgeable, most scholarly person who had studied, written about, researched Indian studies. What if he were a fabulous teacher, had 18 books and innumerable articles about Indian Studies? Would he be disqualified solely on the basis of his "whiteness". That is wrong, just wrong.
Academia is busted. We know that, they know it, they know we know. And we are on the case. I have hopes.
Re-posting Bert's observation....
"The educational establishment (RACKET) has nothing to do with learning or teaching or education.
The educational establishment exists soley to allow educators to draw salaries and develop their leftist positions."
and to destroy Western Civilization on the promise that the world will then be ruled by George Soros and a Committee of Leftist Intellectuals of his choosing.
Sounds like NAZIs to me. And remember those who went along with this promise were tossed up the chimney. We who do not HEED HISTORY are condemned to RE-LIVE that same HISTORY. Back to the future!
about 1980 ward churchill tangled with the head of the print area and the head of the art department, both studio artists. they told him no. he was very angry about it.
he wanted night time access to the printing presses.
but all that stuff's used by fine arts majors at night. while the classes are in the day, the students work at night. there's freedom at night, music, peer groups, etc that young people like.
some students go throught the motions, others get involved. those involved typically work all night doing lithography, etching, silkscreen or serigraphs, photo processes, etc.
these are labor-intensive. many of the good printing students don't do well in academic courses and compensate by spending a full work week in the printing rooms.
AnAmericanMother wrote:
"I came out clean as a hound's tooth," he said.
""You've seen his demeanor, his arrogance; that's not the Indian way," said Bellecourt. "We're a compassionate people, that's always been a trait of Indians.""
General Custer feels your pain.
Everybody seems to be lying except him.
In case anyone hasn't seen it, here is a link to a long thread about Ward and his abuse of copyright laws.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1350713/posts
O'Rilley will be taking about this Monday night.
Thanks.
I do have a small bias here having three daughters and watching over the years how liberal men, usually, are seductive and would use them and their naivete in a heart beat. And one went to CU Boulder. She had wonderful people there who were important to her academically. Some Profs there were so good, so smart and so inspiring to her. Ward Churchill taught her an elective and I heard about him for an entire semester. She was astounded at him so way back in the 90's I was aware of this guy. She called me once and told me that to go to his office to question something, she had to bring him a pack of cigarets, I am not makiing this up!! She had an "a" in his class and failed the final paper. I wrote about this on FR. Her paper was very good but conflicted with his ideas about Indians. Needless to say she is enjoyiing this whole flap immensely.
That said CU is not full of wild eyed fanatics. There are some good people there but they just aren't the ones getting attention. Ethnic studies is a sewer. She was in a science major and that part of the University is good, very good.
just a cursory look at some of these newspaper reports about churchill -- don't prove -- but indicate some problems with women.
It's my CATS who have the tooth problems. My vet says that dental decay and gingivitis seem to be hereditary in Siamese cats. I brushed my big boy's teeth every week (with chicken flavored toothpaste) he still had to have them all pulled except for one lower canine (he looks like that snaggle-toothed Siamese cat in the cartoon).
Ward is going to be walking along a highway drunk soon. The man's world is ending. I would like to see Ehtnic studies, Gender Studies, Women's Studies ended too. They belong in nigh symposiums put on by private girl's schools who need to feel good about their "inclusiveness" not major universities.
There's nowhere left to hide.
The onus of the situation is on them, and them alone.
They MUST terminate his dubious services.
So what happened when WC tangled with them? Did he lose or win? And who was accused of insensitivity, bigotry and racism?
Lets be perfectly honest about the left.
They are no more interested in advancing minorities than the KKK. They are only interested in advancing their propoganda and their own self interests.
They have found that using minorities (especially blacks and native Americans) to advance communist ideas and gain power is quite effective.
They learned a long time ago that only deceit and subterfuge would allow their ideas to go forward. They also had to gain access to education and history books.
What history book tells the real story of slavery? That it was black Africans that sold their own people into slavery.
That native Americans owned slaves that they bought with the money they received when the govt moved them to the Indian Nations?
That slavery is alive and well today.
You are so right. Every since the 70's the humanities departments have gradually been infiltrated by leftists and their fellow travelers. Math and science professors are not concerned so much with philosophical or political concepts so they have remained legitimate dispensers of knowledge.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.