Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wal-Mart ordered to stop harassing workers in Quebec
CBC News ^

Posted on 02/26/2005 2:27:35 AM PST by BROKKANIC

MONTREAL - The Quebec Labour Relations Board has ordered Wal-Mart Canada to stop intimidating workers who want to form a union.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Canada; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bootheel; union; walmart; walmarthell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
I guess Canada can kiss Walmart goodbye.
1 posted on 02/26/2005 2:27:36 AM PST by BROKKANIC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BROKKANIC

Not too smart up north eh?


2 posted on 02/26/2005 2:30:51 AM PST by DB (©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BROKKANIC
So when is the labor board going to mandate Wal-Mart to assign job positions...and at of course the mandated "living" wage?
3 posted on 02/26/2005 2:44:55 AM PST by endthematrix (Declare 2005 as the year the battle for freedom from tax slavery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BROKKANIC

Not Canada, just Q-bec. They are sort of a separate little french closed society within Canada. It's hard to even picture a "Mart du Wal".


4 posted on 02/26/2005 3:13:49 AM PST by Nuzcruizer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: endthematrix

They do manadate the standard living wage there, just like most states do. I don't know what it is though, around $7.30 an hour as of Feb. 2003 according to google.


5 posted on 02/26/2005 3:18:43 AM PST by Nuzcruizer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BROKKANIC

Harassing? What does that mean? Is WalMart insisting they get some work out of Francois and Jean-Claude ? Oh, the horror ...


6 posted on 02/26/2005 3:24:21 AM PST by mgc1122
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgc1122

I can see both sides of this. The workers should be free to decide for themselves. I worked in a meatpacking plant years ago and a union was trying to get in our doors there. The company was anti-union; but, they didn't threaten us. They did address it head on, though, which I appreciated. They called us in, gave us the pros and cons of the union.. told us the facts about that group and let us make up our own minds. They didn't pressure us and the facts bore out - so we sent the union packing (pun intended). The place was generally good to us on pay already.. incentives, bonuses, you name it.
And the union itself was largely looking to leach off us after they closed another facility with their nonsense.

I like the idea of unions but can't stand them in practice.
I like the idea of Walmart (low prices) but can't stand Walmart in practice (worked for them for 4 years). If the union and Walmart off each other - that's a twofer IMO. World would be better without both of them.


7 posted on 02/26/2005 3:39:09 AM PST by Havoc (Reagan was right and so was McKinley. Down with free trade. Hang the traitors high)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Havoc

"The workers should be free to decide for themselves."

You are correct. The workers have the right to quit any job they wish and go find work at another employer if they wish.

The workers DO NO HAVE THE RIGHT to stay at a job they don't like and FORCE their employer comply to their wishes!


8 posted on 02/26/2005 3:57:14 AM PST by DH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DH

That isn't quite stating the case properly, is it. I don't like unions as I said; but, yes, workers do have the right to collectively contract for their services. It's no different from the individual right of a worker to contract for salaried wage. I've done it, and the negotiation process isn't any different from what Unions attempt to do. In practice, though, Unions have largely become useless leaches that don't represent the workers and don't care about the employer.

I worker has the right to negotiate a wage. If the employer doesn't want to pay it, they are at liberty to try and find
other options. Employers love supply and demand when they have the advantage and do everything they can to break it when they don't - thus free trade.. You're telling us workers don't have a right to collective bargaining - that debate was lost long ago..


9 posted on 02/26/2005 4:06:07 AM PST by Havoc (Reagan was right and so was McKinley. Down with free trade. Hang the traitors high)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BROKKANIC

I will admit that I'm not a very good union member. I am a member of one only because that's the way it is where I work. Also I will be doing something about that in the near future. If you look back in history, over a hundred years ago; management was the enemy. Today that has changed. Unions destroy more jobs than they ever help to hold onto and when management stands up to them all their is is whining. Unions are one of those bad factions that James Madison talked about in Federalist #10. If the members would wake up and stop being led like sheep this issue would settle down as Madison said. America is a government of the people and yes we have to remind those people we send to Washington D. C. sometimes. The union rank and file needs to wake up and stop being sheep. Some people may not like what I just said so when your Incoming starts I'll handle it all. God Bless Ameria and all who have defended Her.


10 posted on 02/26/2005 4:29:17 AM PST by JOE43270 (JOE43270 America voted and said we are One Nation Under God with Liberty and Justice for All.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BROKKANIC
What the Union has done to these Canadians is to convince them that they will be better off with union representation at Waldemar. Reality, if better off is to have no job, then they are better off. Now we have 199 employees with a union but no place to work. Really worked for them I guess.
11 posted on 02/26/2005 4:34:06 AM PST by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gakrak

Corretion WALMART not Waldermar. Bad spell checker.


12 posted on 02/26/2005 4:35:34 AM PST by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BROKKANIC

Wal-Mart announced (couple of weeks ago) that the company planned to close a Quebec store, reportedly the one that was closest to unionizing.


13 posted on 02/26/2005 4:40:13 AM PST by elli1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BROKKANIC
I guess Canada can kiss Walmart goodbye.

Would that we could kiss Canada goodbye as easily.

14 posted on 02/26/2005 4:47:18 AM PST by VOYAGER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elli1

The government can't YET force a business to remain open if it wants to close. Let the Quebec government take their ADSCAM money and run a union Wal-Mart clone if they can; I'd be interested to see how well they do.

Our price to ride public transit goes up on March 1st and the Transit union have scheduled a strike vote for March 15. Every time they scream Poor long enough to force the city to let them raise fares (losing millions of riders each time), the union rakes in all the money and the service gets worse, losing more riders. I only ride to work now; and after this rise I will only ride to work in bad weather and will bike to work when the weather is good.


15 posted on 02/26/2005 4:50:21 AM PST by KateatRFM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: BROKKANIC

16 posted on 02/26/2005 5:19:41 AM PST by ETERNAL WARMING (We have the best politicians corporate money can buy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elli1
Re #13...Wal-Mart announced (couple of weeks ago) that the company planned to close a Quebec store, reportedly the one that was closest to unionizing.

Yes, but the store was truly unprofitable and the union organizers ignored the situation, ultimately refusing to negotiate and instead appealing to the French bureaucrats in Quebec.

What would you expect from such a French enclave? Pure stupidity.

17 posted on 02/26/2005 5:21:21 AM PST by squirt-gun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DH
"The workers should be free to decide for themselves."

You are correct. The workers have the right to quit any job they wish and go find work at another employer if they wish.

The workers DO NO HAVE THE RIGHT to stay at a job they don't like and FORCE their employer comply to their wishes!

===========

Amen, DH, and preach on!
Since when do the rights of the union trump those of a business owner?

18 posted on 02/26/2005 5:52:34 AM PST by yankeedame ("Born with the gift of laughter and a sense that the world was mad.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DH

I heard somewhere that the "gripe" was medical benefits. Excuse me, but don't they have socialized medicine?


19 posted on 02/26/2005 5:53:37 AM PST by JENINMO
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Havoc

Excuse me. I forgot that other states besides my beloved state of Texas DO NOT HAVE RIGHT TO WORK LAWS.


20 posted on 02/26/2005 5:56:03 AM PST by DH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson