Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ice Is Melting Everywhere
Environment News Service ^ | February 25, 2005 | Danielle Murray

Posted on 02/25/2005 4:03:38 PM PST by Willie Green

For education and discussion only. Not for commercial use.

WASHINGTON, DC, February 25, 2005 (ENS) - Ice is melting everywhere - and at an accelerating rate. Rising global temperatures are lengthening melting seasons, thawing frozen ground, and thinning ice caps and glaciers that in some cases have existed for millennia. These changes are raising sea level faster than earlier projected by scientists, and threatening both human and wildlife populations.

Since the industrial revolution, human activity has released ever-increasing amounts of carbon dioxide and other greenhouses gases into the atmosphere, leading to gradual but unmistakable changes in climate throughout the world - especially at the higher latitudes.

Average surface temperatures in the Arctic Circle have risen by more than half a degree Celsius (0.9 degrees Fahrenheit) per decade since 1981.

The extent of Arctic sea ice cover has decreased by 7–9 percent per decade.

And the three smallest extents of summer ice ever seen there have all occurred since 2002. According to the latest forecasts, the Arctic could be ice-free in the summer by the end of this century.

The Arctic melt season has lengthened by 10–17 days, shrinking the amount of ice buildup that remains from year to year. As sea ice thins and recedes from coastlines, indigenous hunters and fishers are finding themselves cut off from traditional hunting grounds.

Coastal communities face more violent and less predictable weather, rising sea levels, and diminishing access to food sources. Polar bears, unable to cross thin or nonexistent ice to hunt seals, will soon face a severely reduced food source.

Scientists fear that with continued melting, the bears may become extinct by the end of the century. Seals, walruses, and seabirds will also lose key feeding and breeding grounds along the ice edge.

Marine transport through the Arctic is expected to increase as ice melts and new shipping routes become available. The length of the navigation season along the Northern Sea Route is projected to increase to about 120 days by 2100, up from the current 20–30 days. While this could have positive economic effects, some observers worry about the environmental costs that might accompany increased ship access to Arctic waters, such as oil spills and fishery depletion.

Arctic permafrost has warmed by up to 2 degrees Celsius in recent decades, with soils thawing to greater depths. By the end of this century, the southern permafrost boundary is projected to shift northward by several hundred kilometers, changing regional vegetation patterns.

An estimated 15 percent of the Arctic tundra has already been lost since the 1970s - an area roughly three times the size of California. As permafrost thaws, unstable ground shifts or subsides, damaging buildings, roads, pipelines, and other infrastructure in areas such as Alaska and Siberia.

The Greenland ice sheet is the largest land ice mass in the Northern Hemisphere. It holds enough fresh water to raise the earth´s sea level by 7.2 meters (24 feet) if it were to melt completely, a result expected if the regional temperature rises 3 degrees Celsius.

Scientists project that concentrations of greenhouse gases will be high enough by 2100 to push temperatures past this threshold. Satellite data show Greenland´s ice has been melting at higher and higher elevations every year since 1979.

A conservative estimate of annual ice loss from Greenland is 50 cubic kilometers (12 cubic miles) per year, enough water to raise the global sea level by 0.13 millimeters a year.

The Amundsen Sea region in the West Antarctic has experienced some of the world´s greatest temperature change, with annual temperatures up 2.5 degrees Celsius over the past 60 years. The glaciers flowing into the sea from the Antarctic continent have been getting thinner for the past 15 years, and ice shelves in the region have decreased by more than 13,500 square kilometers since the 1970s.

Since the collapse of the Delaware-sized Larsen B Ice Shelf in 2002, satellites have shown a two to sixfold increase in the speed of glaciers flowing toward the former ice shelf. While most glaciers typically move a few centimeters to several hundred meters annually, these glaciers are currently moving as much as 1.5 kilometers each year.

This type of acceleration has been witnessed throughout Antarctica and Greenland when ice shelves collapse, removing the barrier to the sea for interior glaciers and quickening the rate of fresh water loss to the ocean.

Glaciers in West Antarctica are discharging about 250 cubic kilometers of ice and water into the ocean per year, 60 percent more than is accumulated in their catchment areas - a net change sufficient to raise global sea levels by more than 0.2 millimeters per year.

Ice melting is not limited to the poles. According to glaciologist Lonnie Thompson of Ohio State University, all but 13 of the 2,000 glaciers in southeast Alaska are retreating. Montana´s Glacier National Park may have no glaciers left by 2030, and the ice cap on Tanzania´s Kilimanjaro may disappear completely by 2015.

In South America, Andean glaciers have been melting three times faster in recent years than they were in the mid-twentieth century. Bolivia´s Chacaltaya, once home to the world´s highest ski slope, is estimated to be a mere 2 percent of its former size. It lost two-thirds of its mass in the 1990s alone and may disappear completely by 2010.

Shrinking glaciers may mean a loss of power in Peru, where 70 percent of electricity comes from hydroelectric turbines powered by the annual runoff from glaciers.

In fact, millions of people living in Asia and South America rely on glacial runoff for drinking water and irrigation. If the glaciers disappear, severe water shortages are sure to follow. Meanwhile, rapidly filling glacial lakes in both the Andes and Himalayas threaten to break their banks and flood towns below.

In Europe, shrinking glaciers and snow cover in the Alps are undermining the continent´s ski and tourism industries. By 2025, Alpine glaciers are likely to contain only half their 1970s volume, dwindling to five percent by the end of the century. Pollution from European cities does not help the situation: scientists have measured black carbon concentrations atop these mountains high enough to double the area´s absorption of sunlight.

Such widespread glacial melting has local as well as global effects. Global sea level has risen 10–20 centimeters in the past century. According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, up to 1 meter of sea level rise is projected by 2100, with half the rise attributed to melting ice and half to thermal expansion. As sea level rises, inundation and loss of coastal land will force millions of people to relocate.

Warming and melting could force local plant and animal species to adapt or relocate - an increasingly difficult proposition as wildlife habitats are fragmented by expanding human populations. Changes to the food base of ecosystems, such as decreases of algae and plankton in the Arctic Ocean, could have a ripple effect all the way up to the top predators, including the people who hunt and fish these animals.

Most disturbing, many of the effects of ice melting are self-reinforcing. As ice disappears, land and open water are exposed. When sunlight strikes ice and snow, approximately 80 percent is reflected back into space and 20 percent is absorbed as heat. The opposite holds true for land and open water - 20 percent is reflected and 80 percent is absorbed.

This decrease in reflectivity, or albedo, creates a positive feedback loop, perpetuating the temperature rise and ice melting. Additionally, soot from faraway sources has darkened snow and ice, further decreasing albedo.

Melt water on top of glaciers and ice sheets contributes to fracturing and destabilization of the ice masses and increases flow rates as the water lubricates the underside of the ice. Thawing tundra releases trapped carbon dioxide and methane from newly created wetlands, contributing to further warming.

Finally, increased fresh water from melting glaciers and sea ice could alter ocean circulation patterns and destabilize regional climate patterns, perhaps weakening the Gulf Stream and North Atlantic currents that moderate Europe´s climate. Warmer waters may also decrease the ocean´s ability to act as a carbon sink. If no action is taken to halt global warming, these positive feedbacks could quickly send climate change spiraling out of control.

Melting ice is a harbinger of more change to come. Perhaps in the future, children will look back on the fabled polar bears of the icy North Pole the way we imagine woolly mammoths in the last Ice Age. Only this time, we will know who is to blame.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antarctica; climatechange; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; junkscience; springthaw
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-142 next last
To: UCANSEE2

Boot Hill is the guy getting seriously at work , take a look at his imput data....


101 posted on 02/25/2005 8:57:34 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (This tagline no longer operative....floated away in the flood of 2005 ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: PistolPaknMama
Is there some reason you can't park so that it faces the hole in the ozone layer

Of course!  (smacks self in forehead)  Just point it toward Antartica ... it's melting, so it's gotta be warmer!

Thanks!  This is gonna save me a lot of time.

102 posted on 02/25/2005 9:37:44 PM PST by usgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

No. I am truly interested in how one pole can receive more sunlight than the other.

Seeing as how the equinoxes wind up equally at the same latitudes from the equator, I have always thought the poles received the same amount of sunlight. That the earth wobbles a little is a given, but that it would tend to favor one pole or the other is not something I would tend to believe.

A non elliptical orbit should also tend to even out over time.


103 posted on 02/25/2005 10:17:46 PM PST by rock58seg (The real enemy of good is perfect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: rock58seg

And I truly respect anyone who honestly is trying to learn something.

The Earth wobbles on it's axis, the Earth is more donut-shaped than round. The Earth's orbit is parabolic.

The Polar cap is larger at the south pole, smaller at the north.

The southern hemisphere is warmer than the northern.

Astronomers and Scientists have placed their equipment at the South Pole because it gives the longest, best view of the night sky.

Find out how long the night is at the north pole, vs. the south pole.

Other than that, what would be your explanation for the difference?


104 posted on 02/25/2005 10:28:48 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: rock58seg
Has to do with the Earth's revolution and Sun angle. See here

Eventhough the sun is farther away in January than July, due to the eliptical orbit, the Northern Hemisphere recieves more direct sunlight during it's winter.

More here on all that.

105 posted on 02/25/2005 11:03:45 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
So sorry! I have no explanations for it. While I concede there may be global warming/cooling, ( I just love the new fudge envirowhackos use now, "climate change") I don't think mankind is able to influence it much, one way or the other.

I am still waiting for an answer to a question I posed in astronomy class 30 years ago. According to Hubble's law the universe is expanding. say I am standing on a world in which two other worlds/stars, whatever, are expanding away from me at 100,000 miles per second in opposite directions, due to speed of light limitations they would never see each other. However the real kicker is that, they in some way are moving faster than the speed of light. It matters not that I am standing in the middle, because, perhaps one of the worlds is not moving at all.
106 posted on 02/25/2005 11:11:20 PM PST by rock58seg (The real enemy of good is perfect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

I had an ice cube in my glass by my computer when I left my office at about 5:30 pm.

Now at 11:11 pm, it has melted.

Global warming in rampant in my office, and it's Bush's fault.


107 posted on 02/25/2005 11:12:16 PM PST by Grampa Dave (The MSM has been a WMD, Weapon of Mass Disinformation for the Rats for at least 4 decades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Man you are so hot this evening with the data, you are causing global warming.


108 posted on 02/25/2005 11:17:37 PM PST by Grampa Dave (The MSM has been a WMD, Weapon of Mass Disinformation for the Rats for at least 4 decades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Havoc

" all but 13 of the 2,000 glaciers in southeast Alaska are retreating"


And the reason it's not all of them is.......?


109 posted on 02/25/2005 11:17:45 PM PST by midnightson (Mama-the ultimate prognosticator- said there'd be days like this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: midnightson
And the reason it's not all of them is.......?

They haven't been told about the conspiracy plot yet?

110 posted on 02/25/2005 11:20:36 PM PST by Havoc (Reagan was right and so was McKinley. Down with free trade. Hang the traitors high)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2


Just saw this link on the other thread regarding global warming. fantastic sateite time lapse Years) of northpole ice movement.

http://www.nasa.gov/mpeg/103496main_sea_ice2004_320x240.mpeg



111 posted on 02/25/2005 11:21:41 PM PST by rock58seg (The real enemy of good is perfect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

If this is the same Danielle Murray, she and her gay lover contributed to global warming this past year.

http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/other_stories/multipage/documents/03849727.asp

Couples strolled through the line, hand in hand. Some indulged the spirited crowd by sharing passionate, wet kisses. Others held up their marriage-license applications triumphantly in the air. It felt like being a celebrity for a day, Danielle Murray admitted to me. She and her partner, Catherine Schaber, of Jamaica Plain, had waded through the throng, flushed and invigorated. The first hours of gay marriage in Massachusetts had far exceeded their expectations.

"I’m so excited, I’m shaking," said Murray.

"It’s amazing," Schaber agreed.


112 posted on 02/25/2005 11:24:26 PM PST by Grampa Dave (The MSM has been a WMD, Weapon of Mass Disinformation for the Rats for at least 4 decades.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

The weather of the world is probably on a 10 thousand year cycle. To think humans are THAT influential seems rediculous.


113 posted on 02/25/2005 11:27:23 PM PST by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rock58seg
I found this that discribes the wobble that UCANSEE2 was explaining.

What turns ice ages on...and off

114 posted on 02/25/2005 11:27:45 PM PST by PeaceBeWithYou (De Oppresso Liber! (50 million and counting in Afganistan and Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: rock58seg
Are you saying the earth wobbles on its axis?

Yes it does. In a 26,000 year cycle.

Read this: http://www.crystalinks.com/precession.html

115 posted on 02/25/2005 11:31:22 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls; PeaceBeWithYou; UCANSEE2
Thank you all for your help and explanations. It is now understandable to me.
116 posted on 02/25/2005 11:43:03 PM PST by rock58seg (The real enemy of good is perfect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

Is it getting hot in here?

117 posted on 02/25/2005 11:43:43 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Willie Green

I am here in South East Michigan & we still have 6 inches of white crap still here on the ground!

Global warming, what global warming, I don't see any syinking global warming!


118 posted on 02/25/2005 11:45:51 PM PST by TMSuchman (American by birth,rebel by choice, MARINE BY GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
had an ice cube in my glass by my computer when I left my office at about 5:30 pm. Now at 11:11 pm, it has melted. Global warming in rampant in my office, and it's Bush's fault.

Don't bring no stinkin icicle to a global warmin fight. LOL

119 posted on 02/25/2005 11:52:21 PM PST by rock58seg (The real enemy of good is perfect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: rock58seg

In otherwords, you don't believe a word of it.


120 posted on 02/25/2005 11:56:10 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-142 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson