Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/23/2005 2:55:40 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: JohnHuang2

Thanks. Save for later


2 posted on 02/23/2005 2:58:45 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

“Now, get this through your head. We’re going to spend and spend and spend, and tax and tax and tax, and re-elect and re-elect and re-elect, until you’re dead or forgotten.”

Harry Hopkins, trusted advisor ro Roosevelt.


3 posted on 02/23/2005 3:04:31 AM PST by djf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
"Here's what a 1936 government Social Security pamphlet said: "After the first 3 years – that is to say, beginning in 1940 – you will pay, and your employer will pay, 1.5 cents for each dollar you earn, up to $3,000 a year .

That means you will pay up to $3000 a year, not 1.5 cents on up to $3000 of income. Therefore, this is misleading. A erson making $50,000 would pay a max of $3000 in otherwords.

"First, there's no Social Security account containing your money"

That's right, and that's what is going to change. And there is no "right" to SS payments. You may get a check, but if you have other income, it may be clawed back via taxes. Tax on taxable income will never change. Having income to tax is still a good thing, which is what you will have with this plan. It, like all income you have will be taxed as you beginto draw from the account you (hopefully) saved.

5 posted on 02/23/2005 3:14:13 AM PST by Nuzcruizer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

They also told us that the Social Security number would never be used as an identification number. Try doing business without one sometime.


8 posted on 02/23/2005 3:38:50 AM PST by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Twelve senators, including five Democrats – Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., Richard Durbin, D-Ill., and Edward Kennedy, D-Mass.

Surprise, Surprise... democrats opposing fixing social security by any means. Why expect anything different of democrats?

9 posted on 02/23/2005 5:40:06 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Walter Williams is a national treasure! Plain, unvarnished TRUTH is what we get from him and nothing more.
10 posted on 02/23/2005 5:40:31 AM PST by Bigun (IRSsucks@getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

OUTSTANDING POST! Thanks. Socialist Security is the greatest Forced Fraud EVER perpetrated on free people.


11 posted on 02/23/2005 5:47:55 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

Walter Williams is always a must read.


12 posted on 02/23/2005 7:11:53 AM PST by Phantom Lord (Advantages are taken, not handed out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
If a private retirement company reneged on its promises, we could take it to court. If Congress reneges on its promises, there's no judicial course of action whatsoever.

Cannot be said any more plainly than this! Thank you Dr. Williams!

Social Security is nothing more than a government run Ponzi Scheme and the sooner we all catch on to that fact the better!

Another GREAT POST John!

16 posted on 03/01/2005 4:18:32 PM PST by Bigun (IRSsucks@getridof it.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson