Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Run Silent Run Deep
"Stop the Beast!"

No, let her run. The guy is right. Remember how she dodged the press and any serious questions when she was running for the senate in NY? She could never prevail with those tactics in a national election and she sure couldn't weather the scrutiny.

12 posted on 02/17/2005 9:07:51 PM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: paul51

There would need to be a group like "Swift-Goats" to take her on!


13 posted on 02/17/2005 9:09:51 PM PST by hoosiermama (It's more than an election...It's a change of heart....an enlightenment....life is important)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: paul51
No, let her run. The guy is right. Remember how she dodged the press and any serious questions when she was running for the senate in NY? She could never prevail with those tactics in a national election and she sure couldn't weather the scrutiny.

Kerry got away with it

15 posted on 02/17/2005 9:10:07 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: paul51
Of course she won't have to answer any of the Liberal Press' questions. They won't be asked, just like Kerry.

Pray for W and Our Amazing Troops

35 posted on 02/17/2005 9:34:55 PM PST by bray (Iraq Freed Politically and Pray it will be Freed Spiritually)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: paul51
No, let her run. The guy is right. Remember how she dodged the press and any serious questions when she was running for the senate in NY? She could never prevail with those tactics in a national election and she sure couldn't weather the scrutiny.

I don't know about that. Unless there is sort of "Swiftboat Vets Against Hillary," the press will treat her with kid gloves and trip over themselves promoting her just like they did with Kerry this past election. And even if such a group were to come out against Hillary, I'm not sure what impact it would have, unfortunately--Kerry, unlike she, was an unknown quantity and I don't know if people would be surprised about anything they heard about her anymore.

38 posted on 02/17/2005 9:38:31 PM PST by gop_gene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: paul51

< No, let her run. The guy is right. Remember how she dodged the press and any serious questions when she was running for the senate in NY? She could never prevail with those tactics in a national election and she sure couldn't weather the scrutiny. >

I agree. A Dim winning in NY is no test. What plays in NY does not play across the country. She has none of Bill's charisma. She can try the middle all she wants, but it won't work for her. But I say, "Go ahead. Make our day"!


55 posted on 02/17/2005 10:20:07 PM PST by GOP_Proud (Those who proclaim tolerance have the least for my views.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: paul51

Ahhhh, yes! The billing records are just the beginning. Remember the 100K Cattle Futures caper? And, how about the Travel Office and the cousin with all the skills to shape up the "discredited" office? Hello, Mr. Livingston!

My list has over 100 entries in it...and I haven't even gotten back to poor ol' Jim McDougal. (Rest his soul.)

This witch is "road kill" -- and she probably knows in -- deep down in her dark, heartless carcass.


65 posted on 02/17/2005 11:17:16 PM PST by dk/coro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: paul51
She could never prevail with those tactics in a national election and she sure couldn't weather the scrutiny.

Yet she 'weathered' the scrutiny as first lady and all her 'pronouncement as senator. Perhaps because there wasn't any real scrutiny. The MSM has given her a pass all these years. Why would you think a national campaign/election would be any different? She has been a national figure since the his/her post-Super bowl interview of 1992 where she offered herself as a 'twofer'.

74 posted on 02/18/2005 3:00:15 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: paul51
She could never prevail with those tactics in a national election and she sure couldn't weather the scrutiny.

Who, in your estimation, would be bold enough to confront her?

105 posted on 02/18/2005 8:32:15 AM PST by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: paul51

Don't be so sure....the MSM is ready, willing, and able to pander to her and throw her the easy questions. She will not, however, dare to set foot on FNC or speak to one of their reporters, or any other conservative venue because she's not trying to get their viewer's (reader's) votes. The whole shebang will choreographed from start to finish.....and she will put the same tactics that worked in the past....big dirty money from crooks/foreign sources, voter registration drives (to get illegals, double-voters, dead people, etc.) and then try and stack the important states' voting authorities with her people....don't be surprised if you start seeing swing states voting officers start to die accidentally....she will stop at NOTHING>


165 posted on 12/17/2005 3:55:05 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson