Posted on 02/17/2005 9:55:43 AM PST by 26lemoncharlie
or, Howard, who's your daddies?
Conservatives maybe, Christians no. Matthew 5:25; Agree with thine adversary quickly . . .
Thank God for a sane judge.
I tried to google up some info on her. Pages and pages of Free Mumia crap tells me she's unpopular with that crowd too.
I believe a suit against the D.A., et al., for malicious prosecution is warranted.
And I hope that they sue them into the poor house. Especially the DOJ ttorneys that were advocating their arrest.
Bump
There may be grounds to sue the police department in a civil rights action. Making them pay is the only way to stop this kind of abuse and harassment. Think of the horror these Christians have had to endure the last few months.
Absolutely............and the PC thug police chief, too boot
"We are one of the very few countries that protects unpopular speech," Dembe said after viewing a videotape of the arrests."
So the ( Christian ) protestors were spewing unpopular speech? While I agree with this judges decision, I think she needs to re-examine what she said there.
Unpolular to whom? The gay and lesbian crowd? Is she saying that speaking out against homosexuality is unpopular? I don`t know, I am a little confused about her statement.
YES!!!!!!!
Glad to see that Philadelphia has one courageous judge who is on the side of the angels.
bump
Thank God for a sane judge!!
You said it!! We must make sure MORE SANE judges are on the Bench. We must get rid of these radicals forcing the European Interpretation of the US LAWS.
Thank God for a sane judge!!
You said it!! We must make sure MORE SANE judges are on the Bench. We must get rid of these radicals forcing the European Interpretation of the US LAWS.
I think the judge's wider point is that the whole idea behind the 1st Amendment is that a person shouldn't be punished for expressing an idea that his listeners don't like.
On that particular street-corner, the protestors' speech was unpopular.
Fair enough. Just a note: in the old days before political correctness and femi-Nazism, legal documents and statutes would contain a boilerplate provision that "the masculine gender includes the feminine and vice versa." That is, if the document read "he" and one or more of the parties was a "she," you just read the "he" as a "she," no problem. Now of course, if you don't spill extra ink and chew up more paper and bandwidth laboriously typing or writing out "he or she," you're in trouble. Just a historical observation---nothing more. :)
"I think the judge's wider point is that the whole idea behind the 1st Amendment is that a person shouldn't be punished for expressing an idea that his listeners don't like.
On that particular street-corner, the protestors' speech was unpopular."
I think that too, but it would have been nice to hear that from her. Maybe it was just left out of the article.....But the statement as read, was a little unclear on where this judge actually stood on this issue. The word "unpopular" was a poor choice of word in that instance ( IMO ). This was not about "unpopular" speech, it was about free speech in general.
News we've been waiting to hear!
Judge Pamela Dembe of the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas dismissed the charges, saying that she found no basis whatsoever for any of them.
If you want on/off the ping list see my profile page.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.