Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Million Dollar Baby' Is a Neo-Nazi Movie
NewsMax ^ | 2/12/05 | Dr. Ted Baehr

Posted on 02/12/2005 7:30:45 PM PST by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: Trippin
Wasn't there a comment at the end of the film about the decision (to kill the person) being "heroic"?

Do you agree? Do you think this is a heroic thing to do?

I would think placing one's life in jeopardy to save another is heroic.

But now killing the other person is heroic -- according to the Hollywood propaganda machine.

21 posted on 02/12/2005 8:05:26 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Dr. Kurt Asperger achieved two great things in his life. He identified and named the phenomenon of "autism." and, by getting the concept of the autistic disorder SPECTRUM into the scientific literature, he was able to save the lives of many of his patients when the nazis came for the disabled.


22 posted on 02/12/2005 8:10:21 PM PST by TomSmedley (Calvinist, optimist, home schooling dad, exuberant husband, technical writer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The 'useless eater' propaganda machine is coming to a town near you, starting with St.Pete/Clearwater.


23 posted on 02/12/2005 8:10:21 PM PST by Ohioan from Florida (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Actually, I just went to see the movie, and the ending made me cry. I don't see how the ending is anti-disabled or anything akin to what the article describes at all.


24 posted on 02/12/2005 8:10:28 PM PST by Accygirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen

The movie was based on a story written by a real-life boxing cutman, so it hardly emanates from the "Hollywood Propaganda Machine."


25 posted on 02/12/2005 8:12:22 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Accygirl

Let's review:

1) People who actually saw the movie: Don't have a problem

2) People who haven't seen it: Simply repeating rants in lockstep as mindless minions of Newscrap and WingNutDaily.


26 posted on 02/12/2005 8:14:29 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

All this talk has made me really want to see this movie now, while prior to this weekend I had zero interest.


27 posted on 02/12/2005 8:15:25 PM PST by richmwill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

How true. Though it may be difficult, the less said about some things the better.


28 posted on 02/12/2005 8:20:38 PM PST by TAdams8591 (The call you make may be the one that saves Terri's life!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

This article is whacky and gives us a bad name.

Medved has very specific issues with this movie but I doubt that he would consider it Nazi propaganda.

This is Michael Medved's capsule review:

-----

In “Million Dollar Baby” Hillary Swank plays an ambitious boxer who wants to recruit a new trainer.

That crusty expert is of course Clint Eastwood who also directed this critically acclaimed film that focuses on a cluster of hard luck characters, including Morgan Freeman getting one last shot at the big time.

And Warner Brothers never tells you the truth about a key plot twist that turns this pedestrian boxing movie into an insufferable manipulative right to die movie. With one of the characters horribly handicapped begging for assisted suicide. While the movie kills itself with lots of hooky narration. Rated PG-13 but totally unsuitable for kids. 1 1/2 Stars for the shamelessly overrated, misleadingly marketed “Million Dollar Baby.”


29 posted on 02/12/2005 8:26:14 PM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TAdams8591

Check on the key words. In the beginning, I was interested but this movie has been talked to death.


30 posted on 02/12/2005 8:27:52 PM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Blackirish
I have not seen the movie.....but I have told my family if I ever tun into a drooling, brain dead plant....kinda lika a dim....spare me and pull the plug.

Fair enough, I would too. But here's the key question: would you ask them to inject you with a lethal dose of drugs?

31 posted on 02/12/2005 8:29:05 PM PST by mcg1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Trippin

The dark ages are coming back, mark my words.


32 posted on 02/12/2005 8:31:18 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
Fine. Since you're so familiar with the story, then maybe you can tell me. Was the term "heroic" used in real life, or was that added by the "Hollywood Propaganda Machine"?

You do realize that the subject of euthanasia is very controversial, and can be portrayed two different ways? That Hollywood can take a real life event and portray the character as likable or evil?

I don't care where the story emanates. I care how it's portrayed.

33 posted on 02/12/2005 8:32:38 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
Haven't seen this movie yet but .... My overall comment is that although I am quite conservative, I can watch and enjoy a good movie even if it works a theme I don't agree with. For example, I liked the China Syndrome, especially Jack Lemmon's performance, and even jane Fonda's. When she is crying for Jack Lemmon at the end, I cry too.

But I personally led a movement to take over and change my college PIRG group because I didn't like it's anti-nuclear power message. And I despise Jane Fonda and consider her to be a traitor to this country. But the movie was still well done. "JFK" would be another example of a compelling movie, although nutty.

I guess my bottom line is I am not afraid of being taken in by Nazi or neo Nazi propoganda. And I like good movies.

34 posted on 02/12/2005 8:33:24 PM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
>>>>The movie was based on a story written by a real-life boxing cutman, so it hardly emanates from the "Hollywood Propaganda Machine."

The "real life boxing cutman" wasn't writing about female boxers. The whole concept of female boxing is only moderately less ridiculous than midget boxing. The movie pushes the feminist line: that's concession to Hollyweird No. 1.

Then the movie promotes euthanasia: that's concession to Hollyweird No. 2. You really don't think the movie would be nominated for best picture if the boxers had been male and if Eastwood had heeded the priest's advice and not committed euthanasia, do you?

35 posted on 02/12/2005 8:35:06 PM PST by Thorin ("I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Williams

I haven't seen this movie but I seriously doubt that it's Nazi propaganda.


36 posted on 02/12/2005 8:36:52 PM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar

Yea right, the first anti-smoking laws were passed by the Nazis. History is repeating itself because people fail to understand it and it's not being taught in the schools anymore.


37 posted on 02/12/2005 8:39:45 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist; Accygirl

Let's review:

1) People who actually saw the movie: Don't have a problem

2) People who haven't seen it: Simply repeating rants in lockstep as mindless minions of Newscrap and WingNutDaily.




Actually, my analytical group at work went to see this movie on Friday (Feb 11) as a "team building event". My 'instant assessment', as the credits rolled, was: "This is the most effective pro-euthanasia propaganda film that I've ever seen". When I said so in the theater lobby, most of the others looked at me as though I had five heads. The one who had suggested the event, however, saw my point immediately, and mentioned its similarity to a another propaganda flick from a few years ago: Cider House Rules.

I'm glad I ran across this item on FR. Next Monday, I will suggest that we line up a copy of that Discovery Channel report, "Selling Murder", and watch it together as a followup to this past Friday, which was quite a downer, I think.


38 posted on 02/12/2005 8:41:31 PM PST by Blue_Ridge_Mtn_Geek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: mcg1969
About a third of the way through this article on Restoring the "Hidden Law" is an excellent part on euthanasia and how it should be handled.

I agree totally.

39 posted on 02/12/2005 8:42:31 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Thorin

How dare you criticise Hollywood!!!! Where else would we get guidance, wisdom, and discernment? Without "Platoon" we would never have learned about the venal way our troops behaved in Vietnam. Without "Dancing with Wolves" we would never have learned about the despicable US Clavary and the noble American Indian. Hollywood rules, man.


40 posted on 02/12/2005 8:42:54 PM PST by Zechariah11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson