Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/12/2005 8:24:01 AM PST by Carl/NewsMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: Carl/NewsMax

Maybe it was just her family that was polled. Actually, in NY all they have to do to get their desired results is to ask residents of the cities. For example, Erie County, arguably the most screwed up in NY went for Kerry last November but when you look at the results on a town-by-town basis, it was very much like the country as a whole. Most of the counties towns voted for Bush but it was the city with its "palms-up crowd" that gave the county to Kerry. I'd bet that it was this way across most of the state. Since Clinton would be running on a national basis, it would be more revealing if true, random samples were taken across the US. NY and the northeast is FUBAR due to the left, which is why the demographics favor Republicans (although many Republicans are socialists themselves).


32 posted on 02/12/2005 9:02:24 AM PST by Smber (The smallest minority is the individual. Get the government off my back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Shouldn't be a shocker; after all, they elected the little criminal after she carpet-bagged her way into the state. What's the surprise? That's New England.

Is there something wrong with the New England states? McGovern, Kerry, Kennedy, Dukakis, Clinton, Rangel, Barny Franks, Sharpton, Dodd, (add your own). Have they no pride, common decency, or morals when they vote?


34 posted on 02/12/2005 9:07:51 AM PST by laweeks (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Poll Shocker: NY'ers Call Hillary Honest!

That is absolutely an impossibility!

"NO WAY, JOSE"!!!

36 posted on 02/12/2005 9:09:35 AM PST by VOYAGER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Of course they would say they think Hiltery is honest ... if they answered otherwise, they would have to explain voting for someone they believe is dishonest. So ... the beat goes on ... and the voters of NY are now lying. I believe none of this ...


37 posted on 02/12/2005 9:13:22 AM PST by Phant2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

.


Friends of HILLARY, with their TV News silence about her own worst illegal misbehaviors =


DAN RATHER
TOM BROKAW
PETER JENNINGS



If ADOLF HITLER had had TV up his sleeve, the way the CLINTONS do today, he would have won World War II.


Something America
can no longer afford
...in a new Time of War
...in a new Century
...with an Enemy that's now...
...just around the corner and...
...up your street...
with our own Freedom...
now at stake...
here at home.

.


40 posted on 02/12/2005 9:27:20 AM PST by ALOHA RONNIE ("ALOHA RONNIE" Guyer/Veteran-"WE WERE SOLDIERS" Battle of IA DRANG-1965 http://www.lzxray.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Polls that rely on someone willing to contribute the time to answer stupid questions put to them by a stranger ----- will be biased towards getting answers from folks that don't have much of a life...

BINGO - you get results biased towards the leftist, loser, unemployed yahoos that don't have a life..

THAT is Hillary's base!

When Hillary is forced to go head to head in a general election on a NATIONAL basis --- we can finally drive a stake into the bitch's heart....


Semper Fi
41 posted on 02/12/2005 9:29:03 AM PST by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Any math people that can crunch the minimum population sample size to get these alleged numbers? I suspect it was a very small sample size with a college demographic.


42 posted on 02/12/2005 9:31:52 AM PST by Abogado (Cum catapultae proscriptae erunt tum soli proscripti catapultas habebunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

This false impression has been built up over the years by people who say, "I may not agree with her, but I respect the fact that she stands up for what she believes and says what she thinks..." and blah and blah and yada and puke and gag me with a big old gnarly spoon. I've heard that or something like it countless times. Humans are stupid.

MM


45 posted on 02/12/2005 9:38:11 AM PST by MississippiMan (Americans should not be sacrificed on the altar of political correctness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
"New Yorkers now believe that Sen. Hillary Clinton is a truthful person."

Yep, there's a hell of a lot more than acid rain coming down in the NE!

46 posted on 02/12/2005 9:39:52 AM PST by patriot_wes (When I see two guys kissin..argh! Is puking a hate crime yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
[ Ray's predecessor, Ken Starr, also came perilously close to fling charges against Hillary for her Whitewater fibs. ]

Yes... the very reason Ken Starr was installed as lead White Wash foreman.. which he(Starr) proceeded to white wash the gate and left the whole entire rest of the fence to degrade.. as an eyesore to the Washington D.C. community.. It is STILL un painted too..

47 posted on 02/12/2005 9:44:14 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been ok'ed me to included some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Carl, this is a shocker? C'MON, although you live in TR's hometown of Oyster Bay, you KNOW what the typical Tri-State area voter is like! I've lived 21 of my 28 years in NY and the only thing that shocks me is that the figure wasn't 80%.


50 posted on 02/12/2005 9:54:55 AM PST by Clemenza (Are you going to bark all day, little doggie, or are you going to bite?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

This isn't really surprising. New Yorkers like Hillary. They already voted for her once, and they just finished giving Chuckie Schumer a huge electoral win.

Besides, hillary is a much better liar than bill. She looks painfully earnest, whereas bill has a sly smile that makes him look like a hillbilly used car salesman.

A lot of folks like bill, regretably, but they never believed he was truthful. They just enjoy his lies. When hillary lies, there's nothing to laugh about. She does it with a grim face. So her supporters can't laugh them off, they just have to pretend they aren't there.


51 posted on 02/12/2005 9:55:27 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Nearly two-thirds of Empire Staters - 64 percent - told a Quinnipiac University survey last week that the former first lady was "honest and trustworthy." they were Kool-aid drinking puppets for the DU. Thirty percent disagreed.
53 posted on 02/12/2005 10:00:02 AM PST by VIDADDICT ("A news man is always fully-cocked, Andy." - Les Nessman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

If she is honest both of my parents were Black (I am very pale skin colored). That is the problem with not indicting, she gets to claim she was investigated to death for nothing.


59 posted on 02/12/2005 10:17:20 AM PST by Honestfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
What they don't tell us is the question was....

If you had to choose between Son of Sam, the Boston Red Sox, and Hillary Clinton...who's more honest?

67 posted on 02/12/2005 1:01:26 PM PST by Osage Orange ("Political interest can never be separated in the long run from moral right" - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

<< .... the Clintons were accused of looting White House furniture .... >>

"Accused of?"

Rubbish.

The lying, looting, thieving, mass-murdering, treasonous, co-serial-rapist gangster bastards were plain and simple caught red-handed.

And were forced to return truckloads of loot.


69 posted on 02/12/2005 3:53:38 PM PST by Brian Allen (I fly and can therefore be envious of no man -- Per Ardua ad Astra!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

"...shocker?" That's not a shocker. NY-ers are even wanting to nominate Hillary Guiliuliuani to run against her. ...same thing from both parties.


70 posted on 02/12/2005 4:49:41 PM PST by familyop ("If you disrespect women you are not allowed to wear a mohawk" (Feminist Creed).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

...for the presidency, even, BTW. Have we considered, by any chance, maybe building a fence around NY?


71 posted on 02/12/2005 4:50:38 PM PST by familyop ("If you disrespect women you are not allowed to wear a mohawk" (Feminist Creed).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Oh, and Carl, thank you very much. The information in that column is important to disseminate. There is quite a New Yuk effort to set Giuliani up as our Republican nominee for the presidency--a ploy to put Hillary in the Office, of course.

But we won't let that happen.


72 posted on 02/12/2005 4:55:02 PM PST by familyop ("If you disrespect women you are not allowed to wear a mohawk" (Feminist Creed).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Jim McDougal's dead........

John Kennedy's dead......

How convenient!

Go, Hill, go, on your broomstick!

73 posted on 02/12/2005 4:59:58 PM PST by mickie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson