Skip to comments.
Ear-splitting discovery rocks mammal identity [Evolution, platypus]
news@nature.com ^
| 10 February 2005
| Roxanne Khamsi
Posted on 02/11/2005 6:49:09 AM PST by PatrickHenry
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 441-442 next last
It's not every day we get a platypus thread these days.
To: VadeRetro; Junior; longshadow; RadioAstronomer; Doctor Stochastic; js1138; Shryke; RightWhale; ...
EvolutionPing |
A pro-evolution science list with over 230 names. See list's description at my homepage. FReepmail to be added/dropped. |
|
|
|
2
posted on
02/11/2005 6:50:28 AM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
To: PatrickHenry
The existence of the platypus is proof that if evolution doesn't existt then God has a wicked sense of humour.
3
posted on
02/11/2005 6:53:56 AM PST
by
Squawk 8888
(End dependence on foreign oil- put a Slowpoke in your basement)
To: Squawk 8888
Both the platypus and the giraffe were designed by a committe of LIBERALS....
4
posted on
02/11/2005 6:56:00 AM PST
by
EagleUSA
To: PatrickHenry
This wouldn't be one of those "transition species" would it?
Nah! Couldn't be.
5
posted on
02/11/2005 6:56:19 AM PST
by
narby
(Evolution isn't an Intelligent design, its a Brilliant Design)
To: PatrickHenry
6
posted on
02/11/2005 6:57:31 AM PST
by
evets
(God bless president George W. Bush)
To: evets
But they look so cute and nice...
7
posted on
02/11/2005 6:59:06 AM PST
by
SeamusVA
To: Squawk 8888
![](http://www.pbs.org/kratts/world/aust/plat/images/platypus.jpg)
God has a wicked sense of humour!
8
posted on
02/11/2005 7:03:25 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(ANONYMOUS IRAQI VOTER: "I dipped it deep as if I was poking the eyes of all the world's tyrants.)
To: PatrickHenry
It does complicate things. Here's a seemingly ancestral monotreme which lived long (80 million years or so) after
Hadrocodium, a supposedly basal modern mammal, only the later monotreme has a more primitive ear arrangement than the earlier Hadro.
It will be lawyered to death, much like the continued existence of monkeys and fish, and Archaeopteryx who could fly being older than the Chinese feathered dinos which could not.
9
posted on
02/11/2005 7:05:01 AM PST
by
VadeRetro
To: PatrickHenry
I had to stop to look at a platypus thread. You never know what you will find of FR.
10
posted on
02/11/2005 7:06:32 AM PST
by
Poser
(Joining Belly Girl in the Pajamahadeen)
To: PatrickHenry
All this changed when James Hopson, a vertebrate palaeontologist at University of Chicago, Illinois, took a trip to Australia.
I've met Jim a few times. He's great to talk to. His wife worked in my department.
11
posted on
02/11/2005 7:08:45 AM PST
by
aruanan
To: EagleUSA
"...Both the platypus and the giraffe were designed by a committee of LIBERALS...."
Not true!
If they HAD been designed by liberals, then they would NEVER have survived, ...
...And it would have been George Bush's fault!
(Grin)
12
posted on
02/11/2005 7:11:31 AM PST
by
Mr. Jazzy
(It sucks to be liberal Democrat. Ask Monica Lewinski.)
To: VadeRetro
It does complicate things. Yes, it does. But we go where the facts lead us.
13
posted on
02/11/2005 7:12:26 AM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
To: narby
How bizarre is it that of an entire subclass of mammals, the two surviving representatives (platypi and Echidnae) are so bizarre?
14
posted on
02/11/2005 7:23:12 AM PST
by
dangus
To: PatrickHenry
Birds and reptiles have only one bone to perform this function. Liberals, too.
To: PatrickHenry
Evolved twice? Give me a break. Do people really not understand that evolution involves random mutations and then the death of all non-mutated individuals and their offspring?
The fact is that intelligent people believe in evolution because they believe that intelligent people believe in evolution. (Think about that one for a moment).
We each have a brain to think for ourselves. Most people, for example, aren't aware that after nearly 50 years of intensive efforts, science abandoned laboratory efforts in the late 90's to create the simplest precursors to a living organism. Yet they continue to cling to the notion that such a process occurred by itself over billions of years.
Let's say you gathered all the parts of a watch -- crystal, springs, gears, hands, etc. (which is far less complex than the simplest organism) -- and threw them at your wrist. Do you think they would EVER assemble themselves into a functioning watch? Or how many times would you have to throw your shoelaces at your shoes before they laced themselves up?
THINK for yourself !! Evolutionists have a viewpoint that is as tenacious as a religion.
16
posted on
02/11/2005 7:25:21 AM PST
by
Elpasser
To: VadeRetro
By the way ... I seem to recall a certain poster who used to frequently cite the platypus as an example of a "specially-created" creature, because -- he claimed -- it had no ancestral line. The platypus was his alleged "proof" that evolution was bogus. I wonder what he'd say about all this?
17
posted on
02/11/2005 7:25:35 AM PST
by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
To: PatrickHenry
Blue Boy would of course demand proof that the supposed "ancestor" was not "just a variation of a modern platypus" or perhaps "just some extinct thing." In either event he would ask, "Where are the transitionals?"
The Real Science is so simple, anyone can do it.
To: PatrickHenry
For a single example, a birth defect in which some part of the fetus fails to develop fully can't be ruled out.
19
posted on
02/11/2005 7:33:33 AM PST
by
Grut
To: Elpasser
"When you examine the tapestry of evolution you see the same patterns emerging over and over again. Gould's idea of rerunning the tape of life is not hypothetical; it's happening all around us. And the result is well known to biologists evolutionary convergence. When convergence is the rule, you can rerun the tape of life as often as you like and the outcome will be much the same. Convergence means that life is not only predictable at a basic level; it also has a direction."~Simon Conway Morris (New Scientist Nov 2002)
20
posted on
02/11/2005 7:37:09 AM PST
by
Michael_Michaelangelo
(The best theory is not ipso facto a good theory. Lots of links on my homepage...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 441-442 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson