To: VadeRetro
By the way ... I seem to recall a certain poster who used to frequently cite the platypus as an example of a "specially-created" creature, because -- he claimed -- it had no ancestral line. The platypus was his alleged "proof" that evolution was bogus. I wonder what he'd say about all this?
17 posted on
02/11/2005 7:25:35 AM PST by
PatrickHenry
(<-- Click on my name. The List-O-Links for evolution threads is at my freeper homepage.)
To: PatrickHenry
Blue Boy would of course demand proof that the supposed "ancestor" was not "just a variation of a modern platypus" or perhaps "just some extinct thing." In either event he would ask, "Where are the transitionals?"
The Real Science is so simple, anyone can do it.
To: PatrickHenry
By the way ... I seem to recall a certain poster who used to frequently cite the platypus as an example of a "specially-created" creature, because -- he claimed -- it had no ancestral line. The platypus was his alleged "proof" that evolution was bogus. I wonder what he'd say about all this?
Platypus, anyone?
31 posted on
02/11/2005 7:53:57 AM PST by
balrog666
(A myth by any other name is still inane.)
To: PatrickHenry
Why is evolution contrary to God? He created all.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson