Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nowhere Man

"I do see that you do have a point anthough I admit I would be curious to see a picture of Camilla Parker Bowles when she was younger. Personally, I think he should have married her "way back when" when he first fell in love with her, IIRC, they hung around together in their late teens or early 20's. Diana, unfortunatly, was a trophy wife, but to remain true, he should have just married Camilla in the beginning and leave it at that instead of "alley catting" around on Diana."

I agree, but we are dealing with 'traditional' royalty. Charles wasn't alley catting, because alley cats don't discriminate. The only woman he had an affair with was the one he loved. By the time he got back from his long trip, Camilla had already married, believing Charles wouldn't marry her. He needed aires. Diana had several affairs.

I looked for a pic of Camilla when she was younger and couldn't find one. I couldn't even find a quote from her anywhere. Some articles say she was pretty, others say not. To be fair, she was probably an average woman. There isn't much info on her life. One thing I found interesting was her love for fox hunting. She is a fundraiser for an osteoporosis foundation, her mom died of the disease. Her friends and charity co-workers are feircely protective of her. She has never worked a regular job, but is highly educated and is said to be witty and have a good sense of humor.


198 posted on 02/11/2005 7:51:21 AM PST by followerofchrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies ]


To: followerofchrist
Personally, I think he should have married her "way back when" when he first fell in love with her, IIRC, they hung around together in their late teens or early 20's.

Charles seems to be a ditherer, he probably couldn't decide to tie the knot when they were first in love.

Then he went off to his military service, and that's when Camilla married APB.

So I suppose she didn't think he was coming back to her.

205 posted on 02/11/2005 12:35:47 PM PST by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

To: followerofchrist

What makes you think that Charles did not have many affairs with many women? Did you not read the papers, where his servants testified that he had an affair with his Butler?... Most kings feel that it is their "divine right" to have anyone they want. King James (the one the Bible is named after) is buried right next to his boyfriend....his wife buried somewhere else!

What makes you think an unfaithful man would be faithful to his MISTRESS...and not his wife? That is silly! Look up Tiggy Legg-Bourke and find out why she was brought to tears by Diana.

It is a shame that the Brits continue to finance this debauchery. They need to "divorce" the Royal family, and take away all their titles. Like us, they need to have "No King but King Jesus!"


247 posted on 02/11/2005 7:30:24 PM PST by tuckrdout (The early bird may get the worm; but it is the second mouse who gets the cheese!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson