What makes you think that Charles did not have many affairs with many women? Did you not read the papers, where his servants testified that he had an affair with his Butler?... Most kings feel that it is their "divine right" to have anyone they want. King James (the one the Bible is named after) is buried right next to his boyfriend....his wife buried somewhere else!
What makes you think an unfaithful man would be faithful to his MISTRESS...and not his wife? That is silly! Look up Tiggy Legg-Bourke and find out why she was brought to tears by Diana.
It is a shame that the Brits continue to finance this debauchery. They need to "divorce" the Royal family, and take away all their titles. Like us, they need to have "No King but King Jesus!"
"What makes you think that Charles did not have many affairs with many women? Did you not read the papers, where his servants testified that he had an affair with his Butler?..."
So, anything said about him is true? He cheats on Di, therefore he's a homosexual? Maybe a closet terrorist, or child molester? You KNOW newspapers don't verify, they repeat rumours. Anytime someone is accused of something this horrible, I give the benefit of the doubt because the BIG LIE sells and people are aching to believe the worst because they liked Diana because she was pretty and dressed nice.
"Most kings feel that it is their "divine right" to have anyone they want. King James (the one the Bible is named after) is buried right next to his boyfriend....his wife buried somewhere else!"
"Most" Kings? Perhaps in those days "most" men felt they were free to have relations with anyone they wanted, because their wives and dependent children had no option but to stay.
"What makes you think an unfaithful man would be faithful to his MISTRESS...and not his wife?"
Because he always loved Camilla, not Diana. Had he dumped Camilla after a few sex sessions, instead of a love affair lasting 3 decades, then I would entertain the thought that he was a serial adulterer.
"It is a shame that the Brits continue to finance this debauchery. They need to "divorce" the Royal family, and take away all their titles. Like us, they need to have "No King but King Jesus!"
There we agree. And they should return the land they stole from my people in Scotland too.
Really, I am not a fan of Charles or Camilla because I oppose their fox hunting activities (and their affair). You might not think that's a good reason to take issue with someone, but that's my judgement call. I don't like adulterers either, but it is very common. At least they got married and their affair was based on love. They will have to answer to Jesus for their sins. My entire point here on this thread is that attacking Camilla for not being a beauty queen is shallow and mean.