As usual, our friend Backhoe is all over the Churchill issue in his usual methodical and expert manner.
Thanks! :-)
Posted on 02/09/2005 9:07:22 PM PST by Stoat
February 9, 2005
If Ward Churchill loses his job teaching at the University of Colorado, he could end up giving Howard Dean a real run for his money to head the Democratic National Committee.
Churchill already has a phony lineage and phony war record — just like John Kerry! (Someone should also check out Churchill's claim that he spent Christmas 1968 at Wounded Knee.) In 1983, Churchill met with Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi and later felt it necessary to announce that his group, the American Indian Movement, "has not requested arms from the Libyan government." In 1997, he was one of the "witnesses" who spoke at a "Free Mumia" event in Philadelphia on behalf of convicted cop-killer Mumia Abu-Jamal.
Come to think of it, Churchill could give Hillary a run for her money. All that's left for Churchill to do now is meet with Al Sharpton and kiss Suha Arafat.
Churchill's claim that he is an Indian isn't an incidental boast, like John Kerry pretending to be Irish. It is central to his career, his writing, his political activism. Churchill has been the co-director of the American Indian Movement of Colorado, the vice chairperson of the American Indian "Anti-Defamation" Council, and an associate professor and coordinator of American Indian Studies at the University of Colorado.
By Churchill's own account, a crucial factor in his political development was "being an American Indian referred to as 'chief' in a combat unit" in Vietnam, which made him sad. This is known to con men everywhere as a "two-fer."
In addition to an absence of evidence about his Indian heritage, there is an absence of evidence that he was in combat in Vietnam. After the POW Network revealed that Churchill had never seen combat, he countered with this powerful argument: "They can say whatever the hell they want. That's confidential information, and I've never ordered its release from the Department of Defense. End of story." Maybe we should ask John Kerry to help Churchill fill out a form 180.
In one of his books, "Struggle for the Land," Churchill advances the argument that one-third of America is the legal property of Indians. And if you believe Churchill is a real Indian, he also happens to be part owner of the Brooklyn Bridge.
In his most famous oeuvre, the famed 9/11 essay calling the 9/11 World Trade Center victims "little Eichmanns," he said "Arab terrorists" — his quotes — had simply "responded to the massive and sustained American terror bombing of Iraq" by giving Americans "a tiny dose of their own medicine."
Having blurted out "Iraq" in connection with 9/11 in a moment of pique, Churchill had to backpedal when the anti-war movement needed to argue that Iraq had absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Arab terrorism. He later attached an "Addendum" to the essay saying that the 9/11 attack was not only payback for Iraq, but also for various other of this country's depredations especially against "real Indians" (of which he is not one).
In light of the fact that Churchill's entire persona, political activism, curriculum vitae, writings and university positions are based on his claim that he's an Indian, it's rather churlish of him to complain when people ask if he really is one. But whenever he is questioned about his heritage, Churchill rails that inquiries into his ancestry are "absolutely indefensible."
Churchill has gone from claiming he is one-eighth Indian "on a good day" to claiming he is "three-sixteenths Cherokee," to claiming he is one-sixty-fourth Cherokee through a Revolutionary War era ancestor named Joshua Tyner. (At least he's not posing as a phony Indian math professor.) A recent investigation by The Denver Post revealed that Tyner's father was indeed married to a Cherokee. But that was only after Joshua's mother –- and Churchill's relative -– was scalped by Indians.
By now, all that's left of Churchill's claim to Indian ancestry is his assertion: "It is just something that was common knowledge in my family." (That, and his souvenir foam-rubber "tommyhawk" he bought at Turner Field in Atlanta.)
Over the years, there were other subtle clues the university might have noticed.
Churchill is not in the tribal registries kept since the 1800s by the federal government.
No tribe will enroll him –- a verification process Churchill dismisses as "poodle papers" for Indians.
In 1990, Churchill was forced to stop selling his art as "Indian art" under federal legislation sponsored by then-representative — and actual Indian! — Ben Nighthorse Campbell, that required Indian artists to establish that they are accepted members of a federally recognized tribe. Churchill responded by denouncing the Indian artist who had exposed him. (Hey, does anybody need 200 velvet paintings of Elvis playing poker with Crazy Horse?)
In the early '90s, he hoodwinked an impecunious Cherokee tribe into granting him an "associate membership" by telling them he "wrote some books and was a big-time author." A tribal spokeswoman explained: He "convinced us he could help our people." They never heard from him again — yet another treaty with the Indians broken by the white man. Soon thereafter, the tribe stopped offering "associate memberships."
A decade ago, Churchill was written up in an article in News From Indian Country, titled, "Sovereignty and Its Spokesmen: The Making of an Indian." The article noted that Churchill had claimed membership in a scrolling series of Indian tribes, but over "the course of two years, NFIC hasn't been able to confirm a single living Indian relative, let alone one real relative that can vouch for his tribal descent claim."
When real Indians complained to Colorado University in 1994 that a fake Indian was running their Indian Studies program, a spokeswoman for the CU president said the university needed "to determine if the position was designated for a Native American. And I can't answer that right now." Apparently it was answered in Churchill's favor since he's still teaching.
If he's not an Indian, it's not clear what Churchill does have to offer a university. In his book, "A Little Matter of Genocide: Holocaust and Denial in the Americas, 1492 to the Present," Churchill denounces Jews for presuming to imagine the Holocaust was unique. In the chapter titled "Lie for Lie: Linkages between Holocaust Deniers and Proponents of the Uniqueness of the Jewish Experience in World War II," Churchill calls the Third Reich merely "a crystallization" of Christopher Columbus' ravages of his people (if he were an Indian).
His research apparently consisted of watching the Disney movie "Pocahontas," which showed that the Indians meant the European settlers no harm. (That's if you don't count the frequent scalpings.)
Even the credulous Nation magazine -– always on red alert for tales of government oppression –- dismissed Churchill's 1988 book "Agents of Repression" about Cointelpro-type operations against the American Indian Movement, saying the book "does not give much new information" and "even a reader who is inclined to believe their allegations will want more evidence than they provide." If The Nation won't buy your anti-U.S. government conspiracy theories, Kemosabe, it's probably time to pack up the old teepee and hit the trail of tears.
In response to the repeated complaints from Indians that a phony Indian was running CU's Indian Studies program, Churchill imperiously responded: "Guess what that means, guys? I'm not taking anyone's job, there wouldn't be an Indian Studies program if I wasn't coordinating it. ... They won't give you a job just because you have the paper." This white man of English and Swiss-German descent apparently believes there are no actual Indians deserving of his position at CU. (No wonder the Indians aren't crazy about him.)
As long as we're all agreed that there are some people who don't deserve jobs at universities, why isn't Churchill one of them?
INTREP on Churchill
I'm thinking that in order to be "part" anything, you'd have to possess at least one chromosome from the ancestor that you get your "part" from. But human beings have only 46 chromosomes, and only half of those come from one parental line. So how does one become "one sixty-fourth" of anything?
SITTING BULL-S*** (Ann Coulter provides perspective on Ward Churchill)
Posted by Stoat
On News/Activism 02/09/2005 9:07:22 PM PST · 21 replies · 643+ views
Ann Coulter.com ^ | February 9, 2005 | Ann Coulter
The little Injun that could (SITTING BULL-S*** - Ward Churchill)
Posted by perfect stranger
On News/Activism 02/09/2005 4:40:36 PM PST · 99 replies · 1,541+ views
WND ^ | February 9, 2005 | Ann Coulter
Great research, Ann!
She was on MSNBC with "the guy who looks like Chandler", and said Churchill thinks he can say whatever he wants, thinks he's a big shot because he can "get laid by every college co-ed with hair under her arms, and who probably don't even like men..."
What a hoot!
Oh, brother. This must be the guy who was delivering arms to the Khmer Rouge with Kerry. Then the CIA covered up any sign of his Indian ancestry. Security reasons, dontchaknow.
This guy is a caught-out con man and a failure as a human being. It is a true measure of just how corrupt the university system is that this miserable faker has a sinecure there from which he can pollute young minds with a line of cant that was stale in the 70's. Anyone who had to sit through a class from him should demand their money back.
Great research, Ann!
She was on MSNBC with "the guy who looks like Chandler", and said Churchill thinks he can say whatever he wants, thinks he's a big shot because he can "get laid by every college co-ed with hair under her arms, and who probably don't even like men..."
What a hoot!
ROFLMAO!!! This article is hillarious.
|
|||||||||||||||
Too bad that different titles were used for Ann's piece in the WND posting versus the posting at her website....the article likely would have come up when I did the FR search prior to posting, as I always do.
This way at least people who are looking for the article on FR and are searching with the title from Ann's page they will be able to find it easily.
Hopefully it won't cause you great distress?
Yes, I agree. And .. even if the University fires him - the ACLU will probably defend him and all sorts of interesting information will be exposed.
Time for parents to wake up and find out who's teaching their children - and just what kind of professors their alumni dollars are paying for.
As usual, our friend Backhoe is all over the Churchill issue in his usual methodical and expert manner.
Thanks! :-)
Give 'em hell, Ann!
BTW, cool picture of a tracked excavator ( backhoe )-- I go by "trakhoe" on our sister site Free Dominion...
LOL! Ive never seen this pic before. Jungle fever? haha
Bump to every word. If we don't bitchslap them back, they think they've won. I doubt she converts anyone. But then, Michael Moore doesn't either, and he's everywhere giving them aid and comfort in their time of sorrow. The same noisemaking status should be granted conservatives.
It's good to see that this 60's reject "wannabe" has finally been outed, and further roasted in scathing fashion as Ann is wont to do for those esp. deserving of such treatment. In short he's a fraud of the worst sort. Scratch one up for the good guys (and gals of course)
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.