CIA renditions of terror suspects 'out of control:' report-Boiling prisoner suspects' body parts

Yahoo News, Agency France Presse- Later The New Yorker. ^ | FEB 6 2005 | AFP

[Darksheare]

Umm... boiling body parts would be known as 'rendering'.
Usually for pig feed.
Go.
Now.
Buy all the pig feed you can.
Save the poor terrorist souls from being contaminated with pig.
Hurry!

[Physicist]

True or not, how wonderful if the terrorists really believe all of this!

[cdrw]

Consider that the source is the French press - this is hype.

[randog]

...sounds like the report is a wet dream and nothing more.

It really does have that patina. Reads something like a paperback you'd find in an Army surplus store.

[Lady Heron]

While I agree with you if these were American citizens, part of me screams these are not Americans, they are here as enemy combatants sans country, and the dems want us to use the courts against them. Basically they want our hands tied when they should be questioned if they could be if not they should be taken out(yes killed). This is war, and they are here to disrupt and kill Americans.

What happened to spies or saboteurs in every other war? And since they are here without the backing of a country just a religion, even those rules do not apply. We are dealing with a totally new type of combatant, perhaps they should have signed on to the Geneva Convention before starting this war, though no islamic country ever keeps that promise, but at least we would have.

While it is a very dangerous precedent, it is one bound by certain rules, come here to destroy us because of your religion not your country, Geneva does not apply. They knew that coming here, they just thought we were wimps, they know it now if they come.

[Publius Scipio]

Which begs the question: Why doesn't the Administration make that clear in a language we can all understand?

Because that would be blatantly illegal as well politically and diplomatically troublesome.

[MeekOneGOP]

You've been trolling for a long time and it ain't funny.

Man, really. This guy (ainitfunny) signed up a few days after I did,
and today is the first I recall seeing his screen name.

Oh, no wonder. ALL of his posting history for over 3.5 years is on
ONE PAGE of "In Forum" comments.

Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Viking Kitty/ZOT ping list!. . .don't be shy.

[COEXERJ145]

Looks like we have a sleeper troll that decided to wake up and grace us with his mindless babble.

[Conspiracy Guy]

Guess he got to ride in the cockpit.

[Enchante]

Exactly. Scheuer has been playing by the 'Rat playbook for a long time - he and his like-minded pals are surely the ones who provide all the convenient 'leaks' of classified reports and info whenever they can be used to try to put the current administration in a bad light.

[sam_paine]

Illegal? Are you serious?

[Grampa Dave]

This scumbag was one of the first resignations from the CIA after Mr Goss took over.

The search below shows how under the pen name of Anonymous,
he has attacked our WOT.

http://search.yahoo.com/bin/search?p=Michael%20Scheuer

Beware of any article he has written, is quoted in and anyone who posts his bs on Free Republic.

[Grampa Dave]

"Yep, I think its a troll also. I just got done reading its posts."

I have the same feeling after readings its posts and replies. It never misses an opportunity to slash America, GW and our military.

It smells, sounds and looks like a deep embedden troll.

[Allosaurs_r_us]

"If hooking up a terrorist's scrotum to a car's battery cables will save one American GI's life, then I have just two things to say":

"Red is positive"
"Black is negative"

 

Heh, heh. Now that's funny! I don't care who you are, that's funny! If you don't think that's funny you're on the wrong site.

[MeekOneGOP]

Yep! I bet the countdown timer is already tickin'. :^)

[Publius Scipio]

Yes, illegal. You may not legally execute spies, saboteurs or terrorists without a trial. Period. End of story.

Anyone who tries to tell you differently doesn't know what the hell he's talking about.

[sam_paine]

Yes, illegal. You may not legally execute spies, saboteurs or terrorists without a trial. Period. End of story. Anyone who tries to tell you differently doesn't know what the hell he's talking about.

Uh. Thanks for addressing a point that I didn't make.

I was alluding to the fact that combatants without uniforms or command structure are not covered by Geneva Conventions. What goes on after that is a different argument that you can have with someone else.

My point is that we have yet to publicly and clearly and repetitively differentiated between Geneva-covered combatants and terrorists up front.

[ravingnutter]

Yeah... LOL SYRIA! We catch Syrian insurgents and send them to... SYRIA for torture? right.

More like ROTFLMAO...I stopped reading at that point, the idea was just waaaaay too ridiculous.

[Godzilla]

Point #1 - French source and plenty of old guard CIA sources WANTING to discredit Bush.

Point #2 - Forgot to apply liberal doses of TINFOIL to the article and you fried your brain.

Point #3 - Don't be shy. You started this thread, answer up.

[Lancey Howard]

Thanks for the heads-up and the link.

Regards,
LH