Posted on 02/07/2005 3:50:28 AM PST by PatrickHenry
Al Frisby has spent the better part of his life in rooms filled with rebellious teenagers, but the last years have been particularly trying for the high school biology teacher. He has met parents who want him to teach that God created Eve out of Adam's rib, and then then adjusted the chromosomes to make her a woman, and who insist that Noah invited dinosaurs aboard the ark. And it is getting more difficult to keep such talk out of the classroom.
"Somewhere along the line, the students have been told the theory of evolution is not valid," he said. "In the last few years, I've had students question my teaching about cell classification and genetics, and there have been a number of comments from students saying: 'Didn't God do that'?" In Kansas, the geographical centre of America, the heart of the American heartland, the state-approved answer might soon be Yes. In the coming weeks, state educators will decide on proposed curriculum changes for high school science put forward by subscribers to the notion of "intelligent design", a modern version of creationism. If the religious right has its way, and it is a powerful force in Kansas, high school science teachers could be teaching creationist material by next September, charting an important victory in America's modern-day revolt against evolutionary science.
Legal debate
Similar classroom confrontations between God and science are under way in 17 states, according to the National Centre for Science Education. In Missouri, state legislators are drafting a bill laying down that science texts contain a chapter on so-called alternative theories to evolution. Textbooks in Arkansas and Alabama contain disclaimers on evolution, and in a Wisconsin school district, teachers are required to instruct their students in the "scientific strengths and weaknesses of evolutionary theory". Last month, a judge in Georgia ordered a school district to remove stickers on school textbooks that warned: "This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things."
For the conservative forces engaged in the struggle for America's soul, the true battleground is public education, the laboratory of the next generation, and an opportunity for the religious right to effect lasting change on popular culture. Officially, the teaching of creationism has been outlawed since 1987 when the supreme court ruled that the inclusion of religious material in science classes in public teaching was unconstitutional. In recent years, however, opponents of evolution have regrouped, challenging science education with the doctrine of "intelligent design" which has been carefully stripped of all references to God and religion. Unlike traditional creationism, which posits that God created the earth in six days, proponents of intelligent design assert that the workings of this planet are too complex to be ascribed to evolution. There must have been a designer working to a plan - that is, a creator.
In their campaign to persuade parents in Kansas to welcome the new version of creationism into the classroom, subscribers to intelligent design have appealed to a sense of fair play, arguing that it would be in their children's interest to be exposed to all schools of thought on the earth's origins. "We are looking for science standards that would be more informative, that would open the discussion about origins, rather than close it," said John Calvert, founder of the Intelligent Design network, the prime mover in the campaign to discredit the teaching of evolution in Kansas.
Other supporters of intelligent design go further, saying evolution is as much an article of faith as creationism. "Certainly there are clear religious implications," said William Harris, a research biochemist and co-founder of the design network in Kansas. "There are creation myths on both sides. Which one do you teach?" For Mr. Harris, an expert on fish oils and prevention of heart disease at the premier teaching hospital in Kansas City, the very premise of evolution was intolerable. He describes his conversion as a graduate student many years ago almost as an epiphany. "It hit me that if monkeys are supposed to be so close to us as relatives then what explains the incredible gap between monkeys and humans. I had a realisation that there was a vast chasm between the two types of animals, and the standard explanation just didn't fit."
Other scientists on the school board's advisory committee see no clash in values between religion and science. "Prominent conservative Christians, evangelical Christians, have found no inherent conflict between an evolutionary understanding of the history of life, and an orthodox understanding of the theology of creation," said Keith Miller, a geologist at Kansas State University, who describes himself as a practising Christian.
But in Kansas, as in the rest of America, it would seem a slim majority continue to believe God created the heaven and the earth. During the past five years, subscribers to intelligent design have assembled a roster of influential supporters in the state, including a smattering of people with PhDs, such as Mr Harris, to lend their cause a veneer of scientific credibility. When conservative Republicans took control of the Kansas state school board last November, the creationists seized their chance, installing supporters on the committee reviewing the high school science curriculum.
The suggested changes under consideration seem innocuous at first. "A minor addition makes it clear that evolution is a theory and not a fact," says the proposed revision to the 8th grade science standard. However, Jack Krebs, a high school maths teacher on the committee drafting the new standards, argues that the campaign against evolution amounts to a stealth assault on the entire body of scientific thought. "There are two planes where they are attacking. One is evolution, and one is science itself," he said.
"They believe that the naturalistic bias of science is in fact atheistic, and that if we don't change science, we can't believe in God. And so this is really an attack on all of science. Evolution is just the weak link."
It would certainly seem so in Kansas. At the first of a series of public hearings on the new course material, the audience was equally split between the defenders of established science, and the anti-evolution rebels. The breakdown has educators worried. With the religious right now in control of the Kansas state school board, the circumstances favour the creationists.
In a crowded high school auditorium, biology teachers, mathematicians, a veterinarian, and a high school student made passionate speeches on the need for cold, scientific detachment, and the damage that would be done to the state's reputation and biotechnology industry if Kansas became known as a haven for creationists. They were countered by John James, who warned that the teaching of evolution led to nihilism, and to the gates of Auschwitz. "Are we producing little Kansas Nazis?" he asked. But the largest applause of the evening was reserved for a silver-haired gentleman in a navy blue blazer. "I have a question: if man comes from monkeys, why are there still monkeys? Why do you waste time teaching something in science class that is not scientific?" he thundered.
Science teachers believe that the genteel questioning of the intelligent design movements masks a larger project to discredit an entire body of rational thought. If the Kansas state school board allows science teachers to question evolution, where will it stop? Will religious teachers bring their beliefs into the classroom?
"They are trying to create a climate where anything an individual teacher wants to include in science class can be considered science," said Harry McDonald, a retired biology teacher and president of Kansas Citizens for Science Education. "They want to redefine science."
Religious right
Young Earth creationism: God created the Earth, and all the species on it, in six days, 6,000 years ago
Old Earth creationism: The Earth is 4.5bn years old, but God created each living organism on the planet, although not necessarily in six days
Intelligent design: Emerged as a theory in 1989. Maintains that evolution is a theory, not a fact, and that Earth's complexity can be explained only by the idea of an intelligent designer - or a creator
Your history is as abysmal as your science. Rod of Asclepius.
What? No. Everything evolved from the last common ancestor of all living things to what they are today. A "species" is a label that we put on groups of animals. Not completely representative of the natural order, it is by and large a good way of identifying and distinguishing populations of mutually reproducing organisms. (For example, ring species, and hybrids show that there is no perfect correlation between the species label and what they represent.) It are the most specific of all the taxa (hence "species").
Plants started as plants and continued as plants. Animals began as animals and continued as animals. Humans began as humans and continued as humans.
Well, first, humans are not separate from animals. Humans are animals; African Great Apes, specifically.
Next, (although this is grossly simplified:) You've also forgot to mention fungi (among the Eukaryotes), bacteria and a bunch of other stuff. The ancestors of each of these Eukaryotic lineages found different, specific ways to be reproductively successfully. There was, however, a common ancestor to plants, animals and fungi. None "started" as plants, animals or fungi, but evolved into creatures whose descendants we classify as such.
I'm not sure I follow your point.
My point is that if you concede that animal populations adapt to their environment by having differential reproductive success, you've conceded that natural selection has occurred. There is nothing which stops variation within a species from producing a new species if it provides for a reproductive advantage.
You think the great apes are the ancestors of modern humans? Which humans?
Does evolution acknowledge God as a creator?
I don't propose doing anything with the idiots. I will not
follow where an unbleiever leads. This is America you -and
Ward Churchhill are equally free to belive whatever dementia
you choose. Just do not attempt to profess to know what is
NOT true.And DOn't expect me to fund your unbelief.
probably for the same reason the godless evolutionists LIE
about the Bible and those who choose to believe Truth.
Don't be a jackass. America is no theocracy. I guess you represent, along with the Taliban, the ascension of theocracy in the world. Oh, what company you keep.
He didn't say that (Reading Comprehension: F). He said humans were African Great Apes, and he was correct. Humans and apes are primates and are closely related at that. Name one feature of great apes not shared by humanity.
No, but neither does it deny it. Evolution makes no mention of God whatsoever; not mentioning something does not imply that something does not exist -- except in the fevered delusions of the forever-persecuted.
Festival of Intellectual Insanity placemarker
Evolution, like every other scientific field, does not consider the existence or non-existence of God. Science does not have the tools to address the existence of any supernatural beings. Do you critisize the theory of gravity because it fails to address God?
If there was no God, there would still be evolution.
What's your point?
Evolution is what Communists use to defend their theory.
What's your point?
Evolution does away with Adam and Eve. That means they do away with the fall of man in the Garden. That means they do away with the need of a Saviour.
Evolution does not discuss theological concepts. Scientists are more than happy to leave such issues to clergymen and philosophers.
Evolution itself does away with the need of Jesus Christ.
Nope.
Evolution is totally about doing away with man's need for salvation.
Nope.
Evolution is totally against God.
If God exists, then he is the one who created evolution.
It's not Sunday, so it is ok to lie?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.