Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

690,000 US troops to be deployed incase of Korean war
Big News Network ^ | Saturday 5th February, 2005

Posted on 02/05/2005 8:10:25 PM PST by Paul_Denton

Big News Network.com Saturday 5th February, 2005 (UPI)

The United States would dispatch 690,000 troops to help defend South Korea if war broke out on the peninsula, Seoul's Defense Ministry said Friday.

Some 2,000 military planes and 160 warships would also be sent in the event of an attack from communist North Korea, the ministry said in its White Paper.

The reinforcements would include several carrier battle groups capable of launching multilateral naval operations and air strikes against North Korea's border artillery forces, as well as self-guided weapons to hit the North's air force facilities and weapons of mass destruction, the paper said.

The United States currently stations 32,500 troops in South Korea to help the host country deter a possible invasion from communist North Korea.

But the South's defense policy guideline removed its 10-year-long references to North Korea as the South's main enemy, a move intended to speed up the process of inter-Korean reconciliation.

Instead, the Defense Ministry will refer to North Korea as a direct military threat, according to the paper. The change could trigger a protest from anti-communist conservatives.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 690000; axisofevil; idontthinkso; ithinkyouaremistaken; kimjongill; korea; nk; northkorea; northkoreannukes; nowayinhell; sk; southkorea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last
To: Paul_Denton

Shouldn't we all give thanks to those who were instrumental in North Korea's new found belligerence,

Thank You Jimmah

Thank You Bubba

Thank you Maddie


61 posted on 02/05/2005 9:46:28 PM PST by digger48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

With Mac came Almond, a miserable failure. Doubt if the Chinese are interested in another war on the peninsula right now. Kim Jong Il is on his way out.


62 posted on 02/05/2005 10:07:17 PM PST by xone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton

What if China puts their fingers in that pie again?


63 posted on 02/05/2005 11:59:35 PM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pbrown

Well who knows. We will have to face China sooner or later. For some unknown reason that want Taiwan, an island nation with absolutly no strategic or tactical importance to them. There is also the Malacaa Strait too.


64 posted on 02/06/2005 12:57:41 AM PST by Paul_Denton (Shoot first and ask questions later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: JesseJane

Approxmations: Army 450,000; Navy, 350,000; Marines, 200,000; Air Force, 350,000 = 1,350,000 military.

That's not counting the reserves and NG for Army, Navy, Air Force.

Nor is it countin the Coast Guard.


65 posted on 02/06/2005 5:32:32 AM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Where is MacAuthur when you need him?

Most overrated general in American military history. Good riddance.

66 posted on 02/06/2005 6:41:52 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton
The U.S. could turn that place into molten slag and I doubt Kim Dung Ill is insane enough to take the gamble.

******************************************

Anyone who thinks that PRC would sit still while the US uses nuclear weapons at its doorstep is not thinking past square one.

67 posted on 02/06/2005 6:47:43 AM PST by wtc911 ("I would like at least to know his name.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I agree we might not need so many troops. Don't forget that we really need those Bunker Buster Bombs. From what I've been reading over the years North Korea has tunnel systems that make the ones in Vietnam look like stone age caves. God Bless All our Troops. If it comes to this I want them to get all the support they need. They will be getting all I can give them.


68 posted on 02/06/2005 7:05:29 AM PST by JOE43270 (JOE43270 America voted and said we are One Nation Under God with Liberty and Justice for All.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xzins

Thanks xzins... this is good to know. I wish we had triple the number at least, though I understand technology has reduced boots by some degree...


69 posted on 02/06/2005 7:34:27 AM PST by JesseJane (KERRY: I have had conversations with leaders, yes, recently.That's not your business, it's mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: JOE43270

I agree Joe. Thanks for the comments.


70 posted on 02/06/2005 8:15:24 AM PST by DoughtyOne (US socialist liberalism would be dead without the help of politicians who claim to be conservative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton

IF we had that many troops to send we'd probably have to pull them from other countries around the world. I have a hard time believing that we would do that. A couple of nukes would be a great attitude adjuster for little Kimmy.


71 posted on 02/06/2005 10:26:42 AM PST by NRA2BFree (NO AMNESTY, NO UN, NO PC, NO BS, NO MSM, NO WHINY @SS LIBERAL BEDWETTERS, NO LIBERAL JUDGES! YEAH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

Well we could also flatten the PRC too. 20 ICBMs versus 7,000 ICBMs makes for a very one sided nuclear exhange.


72 posted on 02/06/2005 3:51:52 PM PST by Paul_Denton (Shoot first and ask questions later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Paul_Denton
Well we could also flatten the PRC too. 20 ICBMs versus 7,000 ICBMs makes for a very one sided nuclear exhange.

*****************************

Yeah, I'm sure that's the plan.

73 posted on 02/06/2005 5:27:16 PM PST by wtc911 ("I would like at least to know his name.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: JesseJane

There aren't that many troops to deploy.
Sounds like a goofy article.


74 posted on 02/13/2005 3:07:33 PM PST by MaryJaneNC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JesseJane

There aren't that many troops to deploy.
Sounds like a goofy article.


75 posted on 02/13/2005 3:07:35 PM PST by MaryJaneNC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

Any use of nukes by the US in N Korea would be with prior approval of the PRC. It would be a last resort if the Chinese Army is somehow destroyed on the way to N Korea.


76 posted on 02/13/2005 3:11:09 PM PST by RightWhale (Please correct if cosmic balance requires.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson