Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Woman Faces Perjury Charges After Men Jailed In Bogus Attacks (Every single guy's worst nightmare)
Local 6 (Florida) ^ | February 4, 2005 | Tony Pipitone

Posted on 02/05/2005 1:53:47 AM PST by Stoat

 

Woman Faces Perjury Charges After Men Jailed In Bogus Attacks

POSTED: 10:03 pm EST February 3, 2005
UPDATED: 3:56 pm EST February 4, 2005

 

At 5-foot-9, 140 pounds, 25-year-old Beate Faanis cut a stunning figure as a University of Central Florida golfer, and she quickly caught the eye of fellow golfer Trason Brooks.
 

 

 

  "Tall girl, blonde hair, blue eyes, pretty girl," Brooks recalled of his first impression of the Norweigian-born clinical social worker.

They would date off and on over 18 months, but after their last break-up things turned downright bizarre.

The first sign of trouble came August 8, when Brooks was arrested while working at the Stoneybrook East golf club and charged with attempted first-degree murder and aggravated stalking.

"Absolutely unbelievable," he thought, having no idea at the time from where the charges came. He soon learned Faanes told police he attacked her three times in recent weeks -- and evidence photos clearly showed the bruises she claimed he left behind on her face, thigh, and neck. But there were problems with Faanes' story: Brooks had solid alibis for two of the attacks, and he claimed he had not even seen Faanes for more than two months.

He told Orange County investigators as much, but "they didn't care. They relied on her word 100 percent," he said. The sheriff's office attitude, he said: "You beat this girl, she has the marks, she has no witnesses, but you're guilty."

 

  The sheriff's office says it had no choice but to arrest Brooks, since Faanes identified him and had the injuries to back it up.

  But there was evidence Faanes was a troubled young woman.

 

  Sheriff's office records show she attempted suicide in January 2004 over a break-up with another boyfriend. And, investigative records state, she admitted lying to Brooks about having aborted his baby in an attempt to gain his love -- in fact, she was never pregnant.

But Det. Brian Cross, the lead sheriff's detective, said those incidents did not destroy her credibility. At the time, based on the evidence at hand, he said the most likely apparent danger would be to not arrest Brooks and risk having Faanes later turn up dead. So Brooks, a 28-year-old golf instructor and aspiring real estate salesman, went to jail with no bond

"It was the most humiliating thing ever," he said. "First of all, I've never been in a jail, not even a tour of a jail." When he saw the words "MAX 1" stamped on his jail paperwork, "I think in my mind that means I'm only going to be in jail max one day."

 

 

  Actually, it means he's housed among the worst of the worst prisoners in the Orange County jail.

 

  "One guy had murdered his ex-girlfriend the night before and turned himself in and I'm thinking where in the world am I?" Brooks recalled. "A week goes by, three weeks go by, a month, two months and then I'm thinking, you got to be kidding me. Am I ever getting out of this jail?"

Then he heard of "the best attorney in town," Harrison "Butch" Slaughter, who led a team of lawyers and investigators to uncover the truth. Slaughter persuaded a judge to set bail, but by then Brooks had spent 93 days in jail and the first of what's now a $30,000 legal bill. He said if his family did not have access to a competent, highly paid law firm, he might still be in jail or prison, because the sheriff's office accepted Faanes' allegations at face value.

"Detectives did nothing. They took her word and believed it and rolled with it," said Brooks, adding, "If it was up to them, I would still be sitting in the Orange County jail." Sitting there, it turns out, with good friend Chris Brussow, who supplied one of Brooks' earlier alibis.

"My friend didn't do it and I went before a judge to make a statement," said the 28-year-old Brussow, noting he was with Brooks on a night when Faanes pinned an attack on Brooks.

  Faanes watched that alibi testimony in an August 18 court hearing.

  In October, with Brooks stuck in jail, she came forward with a new allegation: that Brussow came to her apartment and attacked her, punching her face and cutting her side.

There were new bruises and a cut, so this time it was Brussow being carted off to jail. "No matter what I said to anybody, they laughed at me," he recalled. "'Sure you're innocent.' 'Sure you didn't do it.'"

After four days, Brussow got a bond, but freedom was fleeting. On Christmas Day, Faanes told police Brussow again attacked her, this time with a knife, almost slitting her neck.

Orlando police stormed Brussow's condo within hours with a warrant for attempted murder.

 

  "Guns drawn, 'get face down, face down,' probably seven officers at least one dog. We're all on the ground in handcuffs. It's very disheartening to look up see my mom in handcuffs," he said. "All I could think about is this girl who's done this to me. I'm obviously terrified because now I'm going back to jail again."

By then, though, Faanes' tales would begin to wear thin. While out on bond on house arrest, Brussow was attached to an ankle bracelet that tracked his every move. And it proved he was home on Christmas when Faanes claimed he attacked her miles away.

And Brooks' lawyers produced a dozen alibi witnesses and dental records proving he was in Jackson County when Fannes claimed he last attacked her in Orange County, 300 miles away. Finally, a prosecutor asked Orlando police to seek the truth Brooks and Brussow had been claiming all along.

Orlando police presented Faanes with the men's ironclad alibis during an interrogation on December 28, and she cracked in a tearful confession, admitting she inflicted all the injuries on herself, according to court records. "Everything is fabricated," said Brooks. "Everything's a lie."

Little consolation now, said Brussow. "In my opinion they should've maybe looked into it before they came into my house with guns drawn. I guess that's not the way they do things."

  Asked why that is, Brussow replied, "I think it's very unfair. Here are two people's lives and families ruined by a girl (who) lied, all because maybe she was a pretty face."

  Talking to police, Faanes blamed her actions on alcohol and anxiety drugs, but Trason Brooks suspects another cause: "She wanted me in prison the rest of my life ... In her mind we're getting married, we're having kids, we're going to be happily ever after. I made it clear to her that's not what my intentions were."

As she was booked January 21 on charges of perjury and filing false reports, we asked Faanes, "Anything you want to say to Trason about this? Are you sorry?" but she wouldn't comment. Days earlier she told us she really was attacked, but was coerced by police to confess when they threatened her father. Police say that's another lie.

"She needs some kind of mental counseling or some kind of help," said Brussow. "She'll cause bodily harm to herself, she'll injure herself and in the process of doing that attempt to ruin other people's lives." Faanes has received some mental health care, at Lakeside Alternatives, after that suicide attempt in January 2004 and again after she confessed in December to injuring herself, according to police records.

After graduating UCF, Faanes became a licensed clinical social worker and worked at the very same Lakeside Alternatives as a therapist until she resigned January 28, one week after her arrest. As for Brooks and Brussow, they say the ordeal has cost them their good names, their jobs, and much of their life, plus tens of thousands in legal fees.

Both are consulting lawyers about possibly suing Faanes and law enforcement agencies for not diligently checking out her claims before arresting them. But for now they're just glad they're not in jail or prison.

 


Tony Pipitone can be reached at (407) 521-1291 or at tpipitone@local6.com.
 
The first sign of trouble came August 8, when Brooks was arrested while working at the Stoneybrook East golf club and charged with attempted first-degree murder and aggravated stalking. "Absolutely unbelievable," he thought, having no idea at the time from where the charges came. He soon learned Faanes told police he attacked her three times in recent weeks.
 
Evidence photos clearly showed the bruises she claimed he left behind on her face, thigh, and neck.
 
But there were problems with Faanes' story: Brooks had solid alibis for two of the attacks, and he claimed he had not even seen Faanes for more than two months. He told Orange County investigators as much, but "they didn't care ... They relied on her word 100 percent," he said. The sheriff's office attitude, he said: "You beat this girl, she has the marks, she has no witnesses, but you're guilty." The sheriff's office says it had no choice but to arrest Brooks, since Faanes identified him and had the injuries to back it up.
 
But there was evidence Faanes was a troubled young woman. Sheriff's office records show she attempted suicide in January 2004 over a break-up with another boyfriend. And, investigative records state, she admitted lying to Brooks about having aborted his baby in an attempt to gain his love -- in fact, she was never pregnant.
 
But Det. Brian Cross, the lead sheriff's detective, said those incidents did not destroy her credibility. At the time, based on the evidence at hand, he said the most likely apparent danger would be to not arrest Brooks and risk having Faanes later turn up dead.
 
So Brooks, a 28-year-old golf instructor and aspiring real estate salesman, went to jail with no bond. "It was the most humiliating thing ever," he said. "First of all, I've never been in a jail, not even a tour of a jail."
 
When he saw the words "MAX 1" stamped on his jail paperwork, "I think in my mind that means I'm only going to be in jail max one day." Actually, it means he's housed among the worst of the worst prisoners in the Orange County jail. "One guy had murdered his ex-girlfriend the night before and turned himself in and I'm thinking where in the world am I?" Brooks recalled. "A week goes by, three weeks go by, a month, two months and then I'm thinking, you got to be kidding me. Am I ever getting out of this jail?"
 
Then he heard of "the best attorney in town," Harrison "Butch" Slaughter, who led a team of lawyers and investigators to uncover the truth. Slaughter persuaded a judge to set bail, but by then Brooks had spent 93 days in jail and the first of what's now a $30,000 legal bill. He said if his family did not have access to a competent, highly paid law firm, he might still be in jail or prison, because the sheriff's office accepted Faanes' allegations at face value.
 
"Detectives did nothing. They took her word and believed it and rolled with it," said Brooks, adding, "If it was up to them, I would still be sitting in the Orange County jail."
 
Sitting there, it turns out, with good friend Chris Brussow, who supplied one of Brooks' earlier alibis. "My friend didn't do it and I went before a judge to make a statement," said the 28-year-old Brussow, noting he was with Brooks on a night when Faanes pinned an attack on Brooks.
 
In October, with Brooks stuck in jail, she came forward with a new allegation: that Brussow came to her apartment and attacked her, punching her face and cutting her side.
 
There were new bruises and a cut, so this time it was Brussow being carted off to jail. "No matter what I said to anybody, they laughed at me," he recalled. "'Sure you're innocent.' 'Sure you didn't do it.'" After four days, Brussow got a bond, but freedom was fleeting.
 
On Christmas Day, Faanes told police Brussow again attacked her, this time with a knife, almost slitting her neck.
 
Orlando police stormed Brussow's condo within hours with a warrant for attempted murder. "Guns drawn, 'get face down, face down,' probably seven officers at least one dog. We're all on the ground in handcuffs. It's very disheartening to look up see my mom in handcuffs," he said. "All I could think about is this girl who's done this to me. I'm obviously terrified because now I'm going back to jail again." By then, though, Faanes' tales would begin to wear thin.
 
While out on bond on house arrest, Brussow was attached to an ankle bracelet that tracked his every move. And it proved he was home on Christmas when Faanes claimed he attacked her miles away. And Brooks' lawyers produced a dozen alibi witnesses and dental records proving he was in Jackson County when Fannes claimed he last attacked her in Orange County, 300 miles away. Finally, a prosecutor asked Orlando police to seek the truth Brooks and Brussow had been claiming all along.
 
Orlando police presented Faanes with the men's ironclad alibis during an interrogation on December 28, and she cracked in a tearful confession, admitting she inflicted all the injuries on herself, according to court records. "Everything is fabricated," said Brooks. "Everything's a lie." Little consolation now, said Brussow. "In my opinion they should've maybe looked into it before they came into my house with guns drawn. I guess that's not the way they do things."
 
Talking to police, Faanes blamed her actions on alcohol and anxiety drugs, but Trason Brooks suspects another cause: "She wanted me in prison the rest of my life ... In her mind we're getting married, we're having kids, we're going to be happily ever after. I made it clear to her that's not what my intentions were
 
As she was booked January 21 on misdemeanor charges of perjury and filing false reports, we asked Faanes, "Anything you want to say to Trason about this? Are you sorry?" but she wouldn't comment. Days earlier she told us she really was attacked, but was coerced by police to confess when they threatened her father. Police say that's another lie. "She needs some kind of mental counseling or some kind of help," said Brussow. "She'll cause bodily harm to herself, she'll injure herself and in the process of doing that attempt to ruin other people's lives."
 
Faanes has received some mental health care, at Lakeside Alternatives, after that suicide attempt in January 2004 and again after she confessed in December to injuring herself, according to police records. After graduating UCF, Faanes became a licensed clinical social worker and worked at the very same Lakeside Alternatives as a therapist until she resigned January 28, one week after her arrest.
 
As for Brooks and Brussow, they say the ordeal has cost them their good names, their jobs, and much of their life, plus tens of thousands in legal fees. Both are consulting lawyers about possibly suing Faanes and law enforcement agencies for not diligently checking out her claims before arresting them. But for now they're just glad they're not in jail or prison.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: badcops; bang; brazenhussy; chiefwiggum; cops; crime; dating; domesticviolence; donutwatch; dv; fakedomesticviolence; falsecharges; fraud; headcase; hussy; liar; lyinghussy; nutburger; perjury; police; psycho; socialworkers; women
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-302 next last
To: Stoat
Well, no doubt in five years -when she's out of prison or the mental hospital - she'll pull the same stunt

And all the usual dummies will demand her next victim be put in prison because:

WHY WOULD SHE LIE ABOUT IT?

Because women are helpless angels, who never, never, lie.
281 posted on 02/06/2005 12:32:30 PM PST by rcocean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy; PLMerite
Hi All-

"...I betcha if she were not so purty the cops might have not believed her in the way that they did..."


The unfortunate thing here is that if this woman was 5'1" tall, 195 lbs, acne-scarred, and had a faint mustache...the police may have given her case a cursory review, but that's probably it. It is almost like a sense of warped chivalry that they pursued that young man so relentlessly. I hate to be a pessimist...but that's what I'm thinking with regard to this case. Almost like they wanted to hook-up with the Norwegian woman!

It is the same thing with that pretty woman Nicole duFresne in NYC and her swishy little poofter metrosexual boyfriend. She was murdered, but he survived with a few scrapes. The newspapers dwelled on that story for ten days...which they wouldn't have done if her outward appearance was that of a typical twenty-nine year old.

~ Blue Jays ~

282 posted on 02/06/2005 12:51:31 PM PST by Blue Jays (Rock Hard, Ride Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Everybody is blaming the cops here but I think the cops were just doing what they thought was right at the time. There are plenty of real women-batterers out there to make the average cop jaded about the whole thing. Just like most of us will make the worst-case assumptions when we see a tough-looking black man on a city street walking towards us late at night, most cops will make the worst-case assumption when a tearful women shows up with bruises and a story of abuse. Can we blame them?

The responsibility for this travesty clearly falls upon this woman. I'm not buying the "emotional problems" BS either. This is a mean, vindictive woman who is using the law to her advantage to "get revenge" on a man who dumped her. She committed a vile, criminal act and she should be made an example of. I'm talking 10-20 years in a pentitentiary at a minimum. This will make other women think twice about using their advantage in court to destroy the life of another person.

283 posted on 02/06/2005 12:54:21 PM PST by SamAdams76 (What If The Flintstones Had iPods?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

This woman, like many assaultive, vindictive criminal types has learned the first rule of getting the cops to do your dirty work. The rule is this: FIRST ONE TO THE COPS WINS! Go beat the hell out of a neighbor, then call police and say the neighbor assaulted you and you had to defend yourself. Your neighbor will be arrested. The only real investigation will be done by the neighbor's attorney and defense investigator (at the neighbor's expense).


284 posted on 02/07/2005 7:44:32 AM PST by jtmosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I love it on "COPS" when they haul the woman's ass out to jail for abuse.


285 posted on 02/07/2005 9:47:49 AM PST by baltodog ("Thank God we weren't on that bridge when Thurston shot his balls off...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
Give her a fair trial and a fast hanging.
Give him a big payment and clear his record.
286 posted on 02/07/2005 9:51:56 AM PST by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

I'm so damned tired of reading stories like this. When are we (as a society) going to start holding women accountable and STOP punishing men for simply being a man? Some poor guy sitting in prison for 3 months simply on the allegations of some female? Outrageous.


287 posted on 02/07/2005 10:00:56 AM PST by IDontLikeToPayTaxes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

bump.


288 posted on 02/07/2005 7:50:42 PM PST by ambrose (...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

Better ten guilty men walk, than ONE innocent man be wrongly imprisoned. If this results in victims then sorry, but their rights are no greater than the man who is falsely accused, the difference being that they are victimized by the criminals, in the case of the man falsely imprisoned we are all of us the criminals and HE is the victim. Justice is never served by injustices.


289 posted on 02/08/2005 1:43:35 PM PST by WindOracle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: WindOracle
I'm not clear whether you are agreeing with me or disagreeing with me -- or whether your remark has anything to do with what I was saying.

At least part of what I was suggesting was that trying to blame this travesty on the police is an, um, injustice. Laws are not written by the police. Cases are not prosecuted by the police alone, there need to be prosecuting attorneys. Decisions are made by judges. But the person to whom I was responding was wanting to sue the police, and made no mention of the others involved in this disaster.

On a larger scale, what is your view about police and laws the individual officer considers unjust? If I am obliged to enforce a law that I disagree with, should I resign? Would justice or representative government be well served if the Law Enforcement Officers refused to enforce laws they disagreed with?

If justice is never served by injustices, then we will never have justice (until I am Tsar).

290 posted on 02/08/2005 5:22:38 PM PST by Mad Dawg (My P226 wants to teach you what SIGnify means ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 289 | View Replies]

To: WindOracle; ambrose
8 “This is an example of why you should be able to sue the police officers themselves, and not just a department.”
8 “Cops do get sued - but the cities usually indemnify them.”

That is incorrect.

Law enforcement officers can be sued both in their capacities as officers and separately as private individuals. The line between when they can be sued separately and individually is whether the alleged conduct rises to the level of actual malice ("let's get this guy"), rather than mere negligence. Where actual malice is alleged in the complaint, the cities (or counties, or state) are not allowed to "indemnify them", as that would constitute an illegal expenditure of public funds to defend what is, essentially, criminal conduct under color of law.

The case (and you can bet your bottom dollar there will be a law suit over this), will most undoubtedly be brought under the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1871, Title 42 §1983 of USC, and it will likely allege actual malice, as well as negligence. If the state attempts to represent the defendants on all counts, then at the first hearing, plaintiff's counsel will object to state's counsel representing the defendants on the counts of actual malice. When (not if) the judge grants the motion, the defendant officers will be required to secure outside counsel to represent them on the malice portions of the trial.

Whether the officers will ultimately be held to be separately liable depends on the outcome of the trial. If the malice counts are upheld by the jury, then you can go after the officers personal financial and property assets.

BTDT

--Boot Hill

291 posted on 02/08/2005 6:43:54 PM PST by Boot Hill (How do you verbalize a noun?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg
On a larger scale, what is your view about police and laws the individual officer considers unjust? If I am obliged to enforce a law that I disagree with, should I resign? Would justice or representative government be well served if the Law Enforcement Officers refused to enforce laws they disagreed with?

There is no obligation for police officers to enforce any law. Otherwise, how do you have separation of powers? If the executives have to enforce every law, and the judiciary has to prosecute every arrestee, then the legislature has all the power, and the other two have little or none.

As it is, the practice of "officer's discretion" and for that matter "prosecutorial discretion" are well known, meaning they can decline to arrest or prosecute, respectively, although these practices are frequently used to let other government agents off the hook, when a private citizen would feel the full force of law under the same circumstances.

292 posted on 02/09/2005 10:11:42 AM PST by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg
Then where is the justice in THIS scenario, which happened to a close friend of mine who is now sitting in Jefferson City Missouri in prison.

A couple years ago he dated this girl. She kept pressuring him about getting married, which he was not REALLY anxious to do quickly as he had just gotten a divorce 6 months earlier. She gets mad one day, and goes to the police department claiming he raped her. They arrest him, and three days later she comes sobbing into the sheriffs office admitting she lied and that he never raped her, and why she had told them what she did.

Ya think they dropped the charges? What they DID was tell her "You can change your story now if you want to, but be aware that charges of filing a false report will be leveled at you". Well, as I said, he is sitting in Jeff City now, so you know the outcome of that choice.

The only PHYSICAL evidence of any altercation was a bruised wrist she had from a fight that witnesses saw her get into at a local bar two nites before she made her report.
293 posted on 02/09/2005 3:01:14 PM PST by WindOracle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
There is no obligation for police officers to enforce any law.
You didn't answer the question as far as I can tell.

Otherwise, how do you have separation of powers? If the executives have to enforce every law, and the judiciary has to prosecute every arrestee, then the legislature has all the power, and the other two have little or none.

I don't see that that follows.

Does the judiciary prosecute? Does the judiciary HAVE to prosecute every arrestee? Who says and since when? We have grand juries and preliminary hearings, after all.

A bust's not being prosecuted or a prosecution ending up in acquittal doesn't mean it was a bad bust or a bad prosecution. Sure we don't want things like that to happen, it's not optimal. But a good arrest is one that can be shown to be based on probable cause, not on certainty of guilt.

294 posted on 02/09/2005 4:50:00 PM PST by Mad Dawg (My P226 wants to teach you what SIGnify means ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: WindOracle
It seems to me that this post and the general argument lumps together police, deputies, prosecutors, and judges. Once I arrest somebody, from then on it's out of my hands. The Commonwealth attorney may decide I was a dope or not. And if he decides to prosecute, the judge and jury have a role to play.

But if after I arrest somebody new evidence comes to light and the commonwealth attorney suppresses it, I might not even know that happened.

You use the word "they". Maybe a few nouns would clarify things. WHO told her what would happen if she changed her story?

295 posted on 02/09/2005 4:54:38 PM PST by Mad Dawg (My P226 wants to teach you what SIGnify means ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: Stoat
The problem here wasn't just with the cops. Too many DAs are more interested in convictions than justice. There needs to be laws against negligent prosecution with penalties as severe as the alleged crimes. When a few of these sheisters are behind bars the incidents of this will drop off dramatically.
296 posted on 02/09/2005 5:13:14 PM PST by Natural Law
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
If I am obliged to enforce a law that I disagree with, should I resign?

My answer was, I don't think an officer is obliged to enforce any law, which I guess makes you think I didn't answer your question. But, supposing there was such an obligation, I would say yes, the officer should resign.

"Just following orders" didn't do it for Nazi officers after WWII, and rightly so - they should have resigned, rather than following those orders. In order to prevent another Nazi Germany from ever being possible again, one has to have the option of not following orders. (The present UCMJ provides this out: a soldier has the duty to obey lawful orders.)

297 posted on 02/09/2005 5:46:52 PM PST by coloradan (Hence, etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

The investigating officers. The ones she made her complaint to to begin with.


298 posted on 02/11/2005 9:56:56 PM PST by WindOracle (Open-mindedness is ok, just so long as you're not so open minded your brain falls out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: coloradan
I didn't realize you posted this because you made it a reply to yourself.

Let's get serious. The Nazi comparison is just a wee bit tired, unsubtle, and overdone, okay?

We agree that "lawful" is not synonymous with "just", right? So obeying a lawful order does not necessarily mean obeying a just order. (Your parenthetical conclusion seems to blur that distinction.)

My reading of the constitution leads me to think that the people of Virginia have the right, through bureaucrats appointed by elected representatives, to make a bunch of laws, rules, etc. with which I disagree. But I think the people have the right to make those laws. Sometimes I'm supporting the right of the people to make dumb laws.

Oh, here's an example. The security regs in the courthouse where I often work forbid people from sitting in the window frames, which is low and wide and makes a fine 'expedient' seat. I think that's stupid. The windows have bars on them, it would be really hard or impossible to push someone through.

This reg was made by the sheriff who in 2003 was elected to his second 4 year term by a sizable margin - which suggests the people like him.

So should I resign? I know if the sheriff learns (and he makes frequent unannounced checks, so he would learn) that I was routinely flouting his procedures I would be dismissed. And besides, he's my friend, and I'd lose a friend. But the rule is dumb. And I'm pretty sure the sheriff knows I think it's dumb.

Regarding the case in question: Woman shows up with wounds and plausible (probable) accusation. Guy gets busted. (that standard for a bust is "probably cause" not "beyond a reawsonable doubt". The guys doing the busting often don't do the investigating. The case is "investigated", which probably means statements are taken and wounds described, and the prosecutors take it to court. It is tried, and either a judge or a jury finds the guy guilty.

And it's all the fault of the police? I don't think so.

299 posted on 02/12/2005 5:52:29 AM PST by Mad Dawg (My P226 wants to teach you what SIGnify means ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 297 | View Replies]

To: WindOracle
You write:
She gets mad one day, and goes to the police department claiming he raped her. ... and three days later she comes sobbing into the sheriffs office admitting she lied and that he never raped her, and why she had told them what she did.
[I added the emphasis] and, when I ask who told her the consequences of admitting she lied you write:
The investigating officers. The ones she made her complaint to to begin with.

Can you see why I have a problem with your story?

Clearly, an injustice happened, if what you say is true (leaving out the confusion of departments and personnel and all). I wasn't arguing that no police are ever unjust. But even here, it's not just the police. When you learned this, did YOU go to your friend's lawyer? Did the lying girl go to the friend's lawyer, to the DA (or whatever prosecutors you have in your jurisdiction)?

Yesterday in the court where I often work we went through 108 cases between 9:15 and 12:15. In many of these cases, defendants and their expensive lawyers waited for more than 2 hours (at $250 an hour) to be told that if they were not going to cop immediately, they would have to wait until March 11 for their trial. So some defendants paid some lawyers to be $500 to be bored and uncomfortable. Not a lot of justice in that! And such verdicts and sentences as were passed were pretty much pro forma -- "rough justice"

But (this is Juvie, so we're talking about kids here) what I kind of hope the kids learned was that it is WAY better to keep your nose clean and stay far away from the so-called "justice system", because it is clunky, ineffective, underfunded, inadequate, and a HUGE PITA! That, evidently is all the people are willing to pay for.

To relate it to your case: If YOU had gone to the papers, if YOU had marshaled your friend's other friends, if YOU had gotten a lawyer, and maybe a lawyer for the girl (who could argue diminished competence or some-such to mitigate her lie), if you all were to actually expend some cash and effort on your friend's behalf, you might have been able to prevent and might now be able to stop this injustice.

Heck, you might be able to start a civil suit against the girl!

Mind you, that DOES take more work than deciding that all LEOs are unjust.

300 posted on 02/12/2005 6:10:37 AM PST by Mad Dawg (My P226 wants to teach you what SIGnify means ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-302 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson