Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big Media Won't Touch Agenda 21
SierraTimes.com ^ | Feb 3, 2005 | Nancy Levant

Posted on 02/03/2005 10:37:05 PM PST by hedgetrimmer

Big Media Won't Touch Agenda 21 Nancy Levant

I keep waiting, and waiting, and waiting for Bill O’Reilly or Shaun Hannity or Oprah Winfrey or somebody…..anybody, who has daily access to the multitudes, to say the words, “Agenda 21.” I’m still waiting, and for the life of me, I don’t understand the refusal to talk about the greatest threat to America that has ever existed. However, it dawns on me that wrapping a brain around Agenda 21 requires time, effort, interest, and a lot diligence. No one told me about Agenda 21. I found it by accident on the Internet. Then I went to the U.N.’s website and read Agenda 21. From there I went to Buenos Aires, The President’s Commission of Sustainable Development, my local sustainable development commissions and planners, to local visioning commissions, ecology conglomerates, and then back to the U.N.. After about six months of reading about a whole lot of global, national, and philanthropic organizations, I started documenting and keeping running lists because, I discovered, Agenda 21 was huge, highly developed, and a done deal. “How is it,” I asked myself, “that in 50 years, I never heard of any of this before? Where were my trusted newscasters? And why hasn’t my President, or the previous Presidents, ever talked about Agenda 21, the meetings in Buenos Aires, and Agenda 21’s connections to the World Trade Organization, World Bank, and a thousand other global organizations?”

So, I kept researching the Net. And lo and behold, I finally realized that Agenda 21 would never be publicized to Americans. It really can’t be.

As my running lists were now becoming encyclopedic, I also realized that there was no way to explain Agenda 21 easily. It’s too big, profoundly sophisticated, intentionally masked and hidden by corporate agendas and ecological ideologies that are, themselves, exploited by corporate agendas. But more than that, I realized that for Americans to understand Agenda 21, they would have to come to terms with a truth that, I fear, they won’t believe. What would that truth be? Let me try to say it in one sentence: Agenda 21 is the end of America.

As I read that sentence I think, “Well, Nancy, now everyone is going to think you are an extremist and no one will believe anything you say from now on. Everyone knows there can be no end to America….”

But unfortunately, my dear Americans, there can be an end to America, for America is a way of life. The place on Earth - where we are – the beautiful and bountiful lands between Canada and Mexico, might retain the name of “The United States of America,” but I’m not even sure that that is a given. If you believe even half of Agenda 21 and it’s dealings with the World Trade Organization, The World Bank, The President’s Commission on Sustainable Development, The Commission on Global Governance, The World Conference on Global Governance, The Millennium Project, The Court of Criminal Justice, The Nature Conservancy, The World Summit on Sustainable Development, Smart Growth, AND the “visioning” training and manipulation of American people, then you realize what has happened right under our noses over the past 35 years and without one national personality ever mentioning Agenda 21.

So, let me offer a list of website addresses to help readers research for themselves. I suggest you take notes and collect new website addresses. I believe that, as Americans, we owe it to our history and our sense of ourselves, to do the following:

· Read Agenda 21. If you read the other information via the web addresses in this article, you will wrap your brain around Agenda 21. It’s unbelievable and it’s dastardly, because not one politician or national media outlet has had the guts to tell us what was being taken from us.

· Pass your knowledge on to others. Don’t stew and be paralyzed. Take your knowledge to churches, civic organizations, and any other groups or individuals you can, and resolve yourselves to spread the news. Have an Anti-Agenda 21 Parade or Day to draw attention to the cause. Without fail, it’s the most important thing you will ever do in your lives as patriotic people. Write to your representatives and tell them you know what they have hidden, and that their manipulations of American citizens are shameful. Do it.

· Try so very hard to home school your children. Public schools are governmental institutions embroiled in Agenda 21 and its plans for the United States and our children. As you read and study Agenda 21, you will see it alive, well, and operating most obviously in the public schools. You will also see it clearly in the newest communities in all states across the country. Agenda 21 is everywhere, and it wants your children’s intellects and value systems as well as your land and land rights.

· Finally, teach your children about Agenda 21, what it is, and what it is doing to their country. Children have unique wisdoms at every age. Teach them truths so that they can faithfully and fearlessly speak truths. They must understand what is happening in their country. They cannot fight hidden and masked manipulations if they don’t understand how and where they operate.

Now is the time for Americans to help Americans. We cannot fight the loss of our rights unless we understand the game, and most Americans are totally unaware of what is happening to them and their communities. However, I do believe that the bulk of American people “sense” that something is amiss. Let’s commit to them, our children, and our futures. Let’s spread the news and make the media and politicians talk. They have counted on our stupidity, our silence, and our laziness. They have even counted on us not really caring.

We have to remember – it’s our government. It does not belong to politicians. They work for us. Unfortunately, they have not done that, and furthermore, they have advanced a worldwide mission without our knowledge, our votes, or even our opinions. So I say, one town at a time, here we come, and any elected official found to be complicit or a silent player in the Agenda 21 game needs to go.

Agenda 21 – Learn All About It

Basic Explanation of birth of Agenda 21 http://www.johannesburgsummit.org/html/basic_info/unced.html

Timeline of development of world governance and agenda 21 http://www.sovereignty.net/timeline.html

Key players of Millennium Project http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/documents/tf6interim.pdf

HABITAT II – U.N. Housing Requirements http://www.crossroad.to/text/articles/hab2.html

Brainwashing/education http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/brainwashing.html

Global Governance – key international players http://www.sovereignty.net/p/gov/gganalysis.htm

Professor Jeffrey Sachs, Millennium Goals Project http://www.earthinstitute.columbia.edu/about/director/

Rocky Mountain Institute http://www.rmi.org/sitepages/pid61.php

Sustainable Development in the United States – natural resources goals: http://www.un.org/esa/agenda21/natlinfo/countr/usa/natur.htm

Henry Lamb http://www.sovereignty.net/p/sd/strong.html

The Sustainable Development Institute http://www.susdev.org/

American Policy Center – Tom DeWeese http://americanpolicy.org/ invasive species legislation: http://americanpolicy.org/prop/main.htm the Wildlands Project, Smart Growth Project http://americanpolicy.org/un/darkside.htm

American Farmland Trust & the Nature Conservancy & OSU http://www.propertyrightsresearch.org/articles5/rustling_america_in_ohio.htm

Human Settlements – goals http://www.nlihc.org/mahn/habitat.htm ***Education for sustainability: An Agenda Action http://www.gcrio.org/edu/pcsd/toc.html United Nations dissolves USA Sovereignty http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a33916.htm Visioning Training-How To Re-Envision People and Communities www.hhh.umn.edu/centers/rlc/comm/outcome.htm People and their organizations and schemes: http://www.southern-style.com/conspiracy_of_the_left.htm How to force visioning upon the public as quoted from the United Nation’s Agenda 21 document: http://doncasey.home.mindspring.com/vision.htm World Summit on Sustainable Development http://www.minambiente.it/Sito/settori_azione/pia/docs/forum_chairman_summary.pdf


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: 21tinfoilsalute; agenda; agenda21; aliens; blackhelicopter; chickenlittle; contrails; development; ducttape; environment; humanhabitats; itspeople; jbs; landuse; milleniumsummit; msm; nwo; propertyrights; sovereignty; soylentgreen; sustainable; theyrecoming; tinfoil; tinfoil21; totakemeawayhaha; un; unitednations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 781-795 next last
To: FBD

FYI -




FEDERAL BIOSPHERES ARE STILL ILLEGAL
Fiedor Report On the News #300 ^ | 2-2-03 | Doug Fiedor

Posted on 02/01/2003 2:46:58 PM EST by forest

Today, over 68% of public land -- land belonging to the people of the United States -- the land in our National Parks, Preserves and Monuments, is designated as a United Nations World Heritage Site, Biosphere Reserve or both. Worse yet, United Nations' land designations, such as UNESCO Biosphere Reserves and World Heritage Sites, currently take place without the approval of Congress and with no Congressional oversight. Nor are State and local officials, or even private landowners, usually consulted.


By allowing these international land designations, the U.S. is indirectly agreeing to terms of international treaties, such as the Convention on Biological Diversity, to which the U.S. is not a party or which the U.S. Senate has refused to ratify. That is, by agreeing to form UNESCO biospheres in the United States, federal bureaucrats allow a group of foreigners to make land-use regulations for our property and the federal bureaucracy uses the guns of the federal government to force the American people to obey the foreign regulations.

So, although the United Nations has no direct enforcement of land management -- they have no police here yet -- decisions in the use and operation of Biosphere Reserves or World Heritage Sites are set in accordance with UNESCO rules and regulations. There is no treaty or agreement. Some federal bureaucrats(1) took this power upon themselves. Which means, they unlawfully gave the international community an open invitation to interfere in U.S. domestic land use decisions -- decisions which often limit the use of privately owned property, and thereby negatively impact on its value.


For instance, the actions of the World Heritage Committee in condemning a proposed mining development on privately-owned land outside the boundaries of Yellowstone National Park, a World Heritage Site, provides an example of the havoc these foreign programs can create. A member of the World Heritage Committee, Adul Wichiencharoen from Thailand (of all places), requested that a 12 million acre (18,750 square mile) buffer zone be created around the 2 million acre Yellowstone National Park. Federal bureaucrats are attempting to work that foolishness in, but the pesky people living in the area won't cooperate. One bureaucratic suggestion is that the people be removed so the weeds, bugs and wild animals can live in peace.


According to the U.S. National Committee MAB, as adopted on July 26, 1995: "The mission of the United States MAB Program is to explore, demonstrate, promote, and encourage harmonious relationships between people and their environments building on the MAB network of Biosphere Reserves and interdisciplinary research. The long-term goal of the U.S. MAB Program is to contribute to achieving a sustainable society early in the 21st Century. The MAB mission and long term goal will be implemented, in the United States and internationally, through public-private partnerships and linkages that sponsor and promote cooperative interdisciplinary research, experimentation, education and information exchange on options by which societies can achieve sustainability."(2)


Another mission statement is available by the Department of State.(3) Their Environmental and Scientific Affairs office also posted a page of informative links.(4)


Back in the Carter Administration there was an international agreement which many countries signed onto. The United States agreed, in part. And, as always, the American taxpayer got stuck paying big bucks for something that had zero benefit for the American public. The key word there was "agreement." It was not an international treaty. President Carter agreed to participate only in part, and implemented that part of the agreement through an executive memoranda. The administration then secured minimal program funding from Congress.


President Reagan saw the fallacy in the program and canceled the whole thing. However, federal bureaucrats did not conform and continued making more biospheres.


On April 24, 1997, Rep. Coburn offered an amendment to the National Science Foundation budget stating that: "No funds appropriated pursuant to this Act shall be used for the United States Man and Biosphere Program, or related projects." Coburn spelled out the law for the House:


"It is important that the people recognize that the Biosphere Reserve and World Heritage sites are under the guidance of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization also known as UNESCO. The United States withdrew from that Organization in 1984 because of gross financial mismanagement.


"Over 68 percent of our national parks, preserves, and monuments have been designated as United Nations World Heritage sites, Biosphere Reserves or both. There are currently 47 of those sites [97 actually] in the United States, covering an area the size of Colorado. Under the relative agreements, the United States is promising to manage lands in accordance with international guidelines.


"Many times local governments, [and] private property [owners] are never consulted in these management plans. This is a clear violation of private property rights. The biosphere programs, including the United States Man and Biosphere Program, have never been authorized by any Congress, never been authorized, but still received [funds] this past year and this year will receive over $700,000 of taxpayers' money. The National Science Foundation distributed more than $400,000 in grants to this unauthorized program despite the fact that the program has never had a consideration or vote in Congress and has never been approved by a body of the Congress."


That amendment easily passed, as did a number of subsequent amendments to various budget bills specifically defunding the biosphere project -- even though the project never had authorization. Yet, the biosphere reserves are still with us and third-world foreigners from UNESCO are still wandering our nation with the intent of directing our land usage.


Still today, the U.S. and UNESCO Man and Biosphere Program (MAB) seems to be chugging along like the Little Engine that Could. No matter what, it will not quit.(5)


Legally, the Man and the Biosphere program does not exist. Yet, an American citizen can still get arrested for entering one of their many restricted zones. Congress never funded the program, and even stated in a number of bills that no money may be spent on it. Yet, the program is still in full operation.


For more on exactly what a biosphere is, as per UNESCO, and what they have planned for the American People, see the Biospheres in a Nutshell FAQ.(6)


Clearly, this is a gross misappropriation of funds. Stealing of taxpayer money, in other words. That being so, a few dozen bureaucrats should be fitted up with some prison uniforms. That's the only way this nonsense will ever be stopped.


581 posted on 02/06/2005 6:08:08 AM PST by sergeantdave (Smart growth is Marxist insects agitating for a collective hive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 544 | View Replies]

To: Dixielander

Thanks for mentioning Joan Veon, she was just on Derry Brownfield's radio show with a live report from our ruler's conference over in Davos, CH.


582 posted on 02/06/2005 6:08:20 AM PST by lodwick (Integrity has no need of rules. Albert Camus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies]

To: pbrown
Americans..have to be in it.

Please remember that the U.N. is the enemy of free people in many countries throughout the world. We have allies here just waiting for a way to make their voices heard.
583 posted on 02/06/2005 6:09:43 AM PST by cgbg (Come die in Seattle--your vote will still count!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

I like S.U.N. - also your tag, but our man LBJ pioneered campaigning to the cemetary crowd.


584 posted on 02/06/2005 6:13:09 AM PST by lodwick (Integrity has no need of rules. Albert Camus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 580 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave
The UN bureaucrats and their friends operate on the principle of cognitive dissonance.

By creating a concept of UN land and UN control they hope to present future generations with a fait accompli:

"Your Congress Did Not Object".

"This U.N. Provision Has Been In Effect For Decades".

It is the "fait accompli" of the U.N. that must be stopped before then.
585 posted on 02/06/2005 6:16:13 AM PST by cgbg (Come die in Seattle--your vote will still count!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 581 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

And what was one of bush's first moves?

Correct. To sign us back on with UNESCO.

Thanks for reminding me of this.


586 posted on 02/06/2005 6:16:51 AM PST by lodwick (Integrity has no need of rules. Albert Camus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 581 | View Replies]

To: FBD

Heh heh heh...MUD


587 posted on 02/06/2005 6:27:03 AM PST by Mudboy Slim (Eagles Win!! Eagles Win!! Eagles Win!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Hey there, my FRiend...I got a package a coupla days ago...thanks fer the DVD...MUD

BTW...I don't discount grand conspiracy theories like this outta hand, but I just think there is no reason to believe something like this will ultimately be successful...good to know about it, though, makes it easier to confront.

588 posted on 02/06/2005 6:33:09 AM PST by Mudboy Slim (Eagles Win!! Eagles Win!! Eagles Win!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies]

To: lodwick

I'm starting to see the footprints of George Bush I's New World Order socialists in this second term.

How many times did Bush Sr. publicly mention the phrase "New World Order?" Someone did a count and found over 400 instances.

That entire administration was infested with globalists, socialists and thieves.

Bush Jr. kept us out the ICC and rejected the Kyoto treaty. The fact that he's backing LOST tells me that his father's globalist crowd has infiltrated this administration. The president needs to remember the voters who brought him to the dance.


589 posted on 02/06/2005 6:37:05 AM PST by sergeantdave (Smart growth is Marxist insects agitating for a collective hive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 586 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave

The president needs to remember the voters who brought him to the dance.
+++
Now that he's in - why should he care about America?

It's off to do his handlers' bidding, hi ho, hi ho.

Cheers, Sarge.


590 posted on 02/06/2005 6:42:09 AM PST by lodwick (Integrity has no need of rules. Albert Camus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 589 | View Replies]

To: cgbg

Nice!!!!!


591 posted on 02/06/2005 8:42:40 AM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 580 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave
For more on exactly what a biosphere is, as per UNESCO, and what they have planned for the American People, see the Biospheres in a Nutshell FAQ.(6)

Where would I find that article?

592 posted on 02/06/2005 8:52:07 AM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 581 | View Replies]

To: lodwick

Derry Brownfield's program is well worth hearing. I've tuned in the last 15 minutes several times so that I would have access when Alex Jones' program following it came on, and agree that Brownfield is right-on, so to speak.

I purchased a video tape about how independent farmers and farms are being exploited by the powers that be. The plight of independent farmers and ranchers really deserves our attention and defense.


593 posted on 02/06/2005 8:53:07 AM PST by Dixielander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: Dixielander

Nice - you should try an entire hour of The Common Sense Coaltion - the man's been there, done that, and to me, is a calming voice of reason for landowners and ranchers and anyone concerned with the Bill of (not all that many) Rights.

Our family has grain-crop land in IA, and some grazing land in N.TX, so I'm very aware of the assaults on the private property owner in our country.

I need to get that video, btw. Thanks for the reminder.


594 posted on 02/06/2005 9:00:03 AM PST by lodwick (Integrity has no need of rules. Albert Camus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies]

To: Dixielander

I read on another thread yesterday that President Bush was slashing farm subsidies I believe.


595 posted on 02/06/2005 9:00:13 AM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies]

To: pbrown
site map | help | contact us
 
Policy Research & Opinion Heritage home Heritage Research press room about Heritage support Heritage
The Heritage Foundation > Research > Features > Appropriations Watch  
mcgovern
Policy Archive:
view by date
Policy Archive:
view by issue
Policy Archive:
view by type
Features
Events
Heritage Experts
Support Heritage
Contact Us
Return Home
 

Appropriations Watch

These pages demonstrate that during budget season lawmakers and lobbyists operate with a mindset that no federal government spending is bad government spending.

It all adds up. Pork-barrel spending continues to grow when defense needs are a priority, and lawmakers ignore the best way to create short-term and long-term stimulus for the economy: accelerating President Bush's tax cuts, and returning more money to the taxpayers.

FY 2005 Appropriations Bill



Department/Program

2004 Enacted
2005 President's Request
House Budget Resolution

House Approval
Senate Approval

Final Committee Report

Agriculture
$16.84b
$16.57b
$16.78b

$16.83b

---
---
Commerce, Justice, State
$37.6b
$39.6b
$39.8b

$39.8b

---
---
Defense*
$366.4b
$392.6b
$390.9b

$391.9b

$391.2b

$392.5b
Dist.of Columbia
$0.54b
$0.56b
$0.56b

$0.56b

---

---

Energy & Water
()

$27.3b

$27.94b
$27.99b
$28.0b
---
---
Foreign Operations
$17.5b
$21.3b
$19.4b

$19.4b

---

---

Homeland Security

$29.2 b
$31.1b

$32.0b

$32.0b

---

---

Interior
(Wasteful Spending,
)
$19.5b
$20.0b
$19.99b

$19.99b

---

---

Labor, HHS, Education
$139.0b
$142.0b

$142.5b

---

---

---

Legislative Branch**
(WebMemo)

$3.5b
$4.0b
$3.6b

($2.7b)

---

---

Military Construction
$9.3b
$9.6b
$10.0b

$10.0b

---

---

Transportation, Treasury

$28.4b
$25.7b
$25.4b

---

---

---

Veteran's Affairs, HUD

$90.8b
$92.1b
$92.9b

---

---

---


© 1995 - 2005 The Heritage Foundation
All Rights Reserved.
Read our privacy guidelines. | Contact us. | Return Home.

596 posted on 02/06/2005 9:06:24 AM PST by lodwick (Integrity has no need of rules. Albert Camus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 595 | View Replies]

To: lodwick

If this is slashing, dear God, don't let him cut anything.


597 posted on 02/06/2005 9:07:48 AM PST by lodwick (Integrity has no need of rules. Albert Camus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 596 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

Bump for later


598 posted on 02/06/2005 9:09:44 AM PST by Boazo (From the mind of BOAZO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boazo; everyone

HOW TO SPEAK ABOUT WOMEN AND BE POLITICALLY CORRECT:

1. She is not a "BABE" or a "CHICK" - She is "BREASTED AMERICAN."

2. She is not a "SCREAMER" or a "MOANER" - She IS "VOCALLY APPRECIATIVE."

3. She is not "EASY" - She is "HORIZONTALLY ACCESSIBLE."

4. She is not a "DUMB BLONDE" - She is a "LIGHT-HAIRED DETOUR OFF THE INFORMATION SUPERHIGHWAY."

5. She has not "BEEN AROUND" - She is A "PREVIOUSLY-ENJOYED COMPANION."

6. She is not an "AIRHEAD" - She is "REALITY IMPAIRED."

7. She does not get "DRUNK" or "TIPSY" - She gets "CHEMICALLY INCONVENIENCED."

8. She does not have "BREAST IMPLANTS" - She is "MEDICALLY ENHANCED."

9. She does not "NAG" you - She becomes "VERBALLY REPETITIVE."

10. She is not a "TRAMP" - She is "SEXUALLY EXTROVERTED."

11. She does not have "MAJOR LEAGUE HOOTERS" - She Is "PECTORALLY SUPERIOR."

12. She is not a "TWO-BIT HOOKER" - She is a "LOW COST PROVIDER." ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

HOW TO SPEAK ABOUT MEN AND BE POLITICALLY CORRECT:

1. He does not have a "BEER GUT" - He has developed a "LIQUID GRAIN STORAGE FACILITY."

2. He is not a "BAD DANCER" - He is "OVERLY CAUCASIAN."

3. He does not "GET LOST ALL THE TIME" - He "INVESTIGATES ALTERNATIVE DESTINATIONS."

4. He is not "BALDING" - He is in "FOLLICLE REGRESSION."

5. He is not a "CRADLE ROBBER" - He prefers "GENERATIONAL DIFFERENTIAL RELATIONSHIPS."

6. He does not get "FALLING-DOWN DRUNK" - He becomes "ACCIDENTALLY HORIZONTAL."

7. He does not act like a "TOTAL ASS" - He develops a case of "RECTAL-CRANIAL INVERSION."

8. He is not a "MALE CHAUVINIST PIG" - He has "SWINE EMPATHY."

9. He is not afraid of "COMMITMENT" - He is "RELATIONSHIP CHALLENGED."

10. He is not "HORNY" - He is "SEXUALLY FOCUSED."

11. It's not his "CRACK" you see hanging out of his pants - It's "REAR CLEAVAGE."


599 posted on 02/06/2005 9:13:03 AM PST by lodwick (Integrity has no need of rules. Albert Camus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies]

To: lodwick
What a pittance Homeland Security is.

I believe 9-11 cost our economy a one day hit of 2 Trillion, financially speaking.

600 posted on 02/06/2005 9:19:09 AM PST by processing please hold (Islam and Christianity do not mix ----9-11 taught us that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 596 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 781-795 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson