Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Reid, Pelosi reject Kennedy's calls for set withdrawal
The Washington Times ^ | February 1, 2005 | Stephen Dinan

Posted on 02/01/2005 10:19:57 AM PST by vivabushchick

Congress' top two Democrats said yesterday that there should not be a set schedule for pulling troops out of Iraq, contradicting Sen. Edward M. Kennedy's call on Thursday for the United States to withdraw 12,000 troops immediately and complete a full withdrawal by early 2006. "As far as setting a timeline, as we learned in the Balkans, that's not a wise decision, because it only empowers those who don't want us there. And it doesn't work well to do that," said Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, Nevada Democrat. On Thursday, Mr. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, gave a speech calling for an immediate withdrawal of some troops as a way of showing that the United States does not intend to be an occupying force and then called for the military to come up with a plan for complete pullout in early 2006. But House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, who joined Mr. Reid for a "prebuttal" to President Bush's upcoming State of the Union address, said the critical element is having a clear set of goals. "It's not about a calendar; it's about performance," Mrs. Pelosi said when asked whether she agreed with Mr. Kennedy's call. But she said the administration still hasn't laid out a clear set of performance goals so Americans can judge progress. "But if you have no plan, no road map, no standards, it's very hard to judge whether you have succeeded and whether it's time to come home," she said.

(Excerpt) Read more at insider.washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: democrats; politics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last
“…House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, who joined Mr. Reid for a "prebuttal" to President Bush's upcoming State of the Union address, said the critical element is having a clear set of goals. "It's not about a calendar; it's about performance," Mrs. Pelosi said when asked whether she agreed with Mr. Kennedy's call. But she said the administration still hasn't laid out a clear set of performance goals so Americans can judge progress. "But if you have no plan, no road map, no standards, it's very hard to judge whether you have succeeded and whether it's time to come home," she said.”

Hello! No plan, no roadmap, no standards? Where does this woman hang out, in a cellar? Perhaps with the likes of David Orr, Guardian, UK, editorial February 20, 2003 ” Bushes Time Table Unraveling http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0220-01.htm ” LOL!

Operation Iraqi Freedom, check. Saddam Hussein captured, check. Reconstruction, check. Interim government, check. Prisoner abuse investigated and trial, check. IRAQI ELECTIONS 1/30/2005, CHECK AND DOUBLE CHECK.

1 posted on 02/01/2005 10:19:58 AM PST by vivabushchick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vivabushchick

You don't possibly suggest there is confusion in the democratic ranks do you? (/sarcasm;-)


2 posted on 02/01/2005 10:21:42 AM PST by Cornpone (Aging Warrior -- Aim High -- Who Dares Wins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vivabushchick

3 posted on 02/01/2005 10:21:55 AM PST by My2Cents ("I look to two things: First to God and then to Fox News.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vivabushchick

These three dingbats dont have anything to do with our troops anyway , why dont they shut the hell up and let the legitimately elected president of the United States do his job.

These 3 individuals are irrelevent.


4 posted on 02/01/2005 10:23:14 AM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vivabushchick
Sen. Edward M. Kennedy's call on Thursday for the United States to withdraw

Withdraw is what Joe and Ethel should have done.... A LOT!

5 posted on 02/01/2005 10:23:19 AM PST by N. Theknow (Yust an old salty seadog, pumpin' up da birden.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vivabushchick
RATS jumping sinking ship...er, ah, sinking Oldsmobile that is ...?
6 posted on 02/01/2005 10:26:52 AM PST by meandog (qu"Do unto others before they do unto you!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

Oh my.....I'm persuaded.....


7 posted on 02/01/2005 10:27:16 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: vivabushchick

A few of the major rats have figured out that Teddy the Swimmer is just about through, for good.


8 posted on 02/01/2005 10:27:55 AM PST by keysguy (Time to get rid of the UN and the ACLU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vivabushchick
Lets hear a hallelujah for a Kennedy bitch slap
9 posted on 02/01/2005 10:30:39 AM PST by SF Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vivabushchick

Ah yes, this is where the RATS start eating their own! I can hardly wait to see Kennedy's reaction. :)


10 posted on 02/01/2005 10:36:24 AM PST by NRA2BFree (NO AMNESTY, NO UN, NO PC, NO BS, NO MSM, NO WHINY @SS LIBERAL BEDWETTERS, NO LIBERAL JUDGES! YEAH!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: keysguy
A few of the major rats have figured out that Teddy the Swimmer is just about through, for good

Took 'em long enough. I knew this about 20 years ago....

11 posted on 02/01/2005 10:39:41 AM PST by dirtbiker (Solution for Terrorism: Nuke 'em 'till they glow, then shoot 'em in the dark!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: keysguy

They should let the Swimmer sleep with the fishes, politically speaking.


12 posted on 02/01/2005 10:40:18 AM PST by My2Cents ("I look to two things: First to God and then to Fox News.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: vivabushchick
Some things seem quite interesting. The Republicans conrol the Senate. That means they can control when confirmation hearings take place.

When Condi Rice was first announced as the new Secretary of State they announced that she would have confirmation hearings in November or early December. Then it got changed to the week before the Iraq Elections. Why?

Presidnet Bush has had only held about 16 press conferences since he took office over 4 years ago. He held one just hours before the Iraq Election ... Why? The media ran clips of the Democrats trashing Bush for the Quagmire in Iraq and they ran clips of Bush saying the voting would go well. They did this just hours before the voting began. Why?

Democrats decided to use the confirmation hearings to trash Bush on the quagmire in Iraq. Then after the hearings Frist was kind enourgh to grant nearly 10 hours time on the Thursday and Friday before the Election in Iraq so the Democrats could trash President Bush on Iraq. Why did Frist give in so quickly.

Click here for the tator take on the Democratic and Repubican Strategies concerning the Iraq Election

13 posted on 02/01/2005 10:40:41 AM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vivabushchick
Sooner or later, Sub-Mariner will reach the point where his own party considers him too big a liability to run around loose. Maybe we can see that day from here.

Suppose he'll go quietly?

14 posted on 02/01/2005 10:46:45 AM PST by niteowl77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vivabushchick

Mr. and Mrs. Harry Pelosi make such a delightful couple.


15 posted on 02/01/2005 10:50:26 AM PST by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vivabushchick
So the Chappaquiddick fat boy has had his comeuppance.
16 posted on 02/01/2005 10:52:21 AM PST by Puckster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
"Today it is 10 times easier to divide and conquer the Republicans in the Senate than it was just a week ago."

Very interesting analysis, but what does this sentence mean? -- Did you mean to say Democrats ?

17 posted on 02/01/2005 10:57:37 AM PST by gatex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

good likeness


18 posted on 02/01/2005 11:10:13 AM PST by vivabushchick ("Picture a smiley face on the Red States")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: N. Theknow

Retro Recall


19 posted on 02/01/2005 11:11:33 AM PST by vivabushchick ("Picture a smiley face on the Red States")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents

Nice match, but the joker is actually more attractive than Nancy Pelosi!


20 posted on 02/01/2005 11:12:16 AM PST by PilloryHillary (Yes, I was JohnFKerrySucks, but it's time to move on. Pillory Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson