Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NAACP refuses to cooperate with IRS probe into allegedly political activity
AP via The SF Chronicle ^ | 31 Jan 2005 | AP

Posted on 01/31/2005 10:38:32 AM PST by byteback

The NAACP, the nation's oldest civil rights organization, is refusing to cooperate with an IRS investigation into whether its chairman made an improper political speech, charging that the timing of the probe was itself politically motivated.

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People said in October that the group's tax-exempt status was under review after its chairman, Julian Bond, gave a speech that criticized President Bush.

In a letter to the IRS on Thursday, NAACP attorneys said the group will not hand over documents requested in the probe and argued that the IRS followed improper procedure by launching its exam before the group filed its 2004 tax return.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: blackhistorymonth; bond; freespeech; infume; irs; jessejackson; naacp; racecard; racehustlers; racepimps; taxes; taxinvasion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last
The IRS could request that the Justice Department ask a federal court to enforce the summons and hand over the requested documents.
1 posted on 01/31/2005 10:38:33 AM PST by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: byteback

NAACP should change its name to:

National
Association (of)
Constantly
Complaining
People

It would be more fitting.


2 posted on 01/31/2005 10:40:20 AM PST by HMFIC (The Peace Symbol is the FOOTPRINT of the American CHICKEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: byteback
...refuses to cooperate with IRS...

Now there's a bright move. This could be vvvvery interesting.

3 posted on 01/31/2005 10:41:19 AM PST by Lurking in Kansas (what are you looking at?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: byteback

"REFUSES"? Who do they think they are -- the NAACP?


4 posted on 01/31/2005 10:42:23 AM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: byteback; rdb3; mhking; Trueblackman; blackie; swheats

The NAACP's current strategy of antagonizing the IRS has very, very little chance of earning them anything but grief.

5 posted on 01/31/2005 10:42:25 AM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: byteback
In a letter to the IRS on Thursday, NAACP attorneys said ...

"You just wait 'til Jesse gets here. He'll tell it like it is!"

Someone's gonna play the race card. The Man is picking on the NAACP.

7 posted on 01/31/2005 10:45:18 AM PST by newgeezer (Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newgeezer

8 posted on 01/31/2005 10:49:02 AM PST by day10 (Rules cannot substitute for character.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: byteback

CORRECTION to this article: The OLDEST, and BY FAR the LARGEST Civil Righrs organization in the US (and the world) is the NRA - The National Rifle Association, founded 1871, with over 4 million members!


9 posted on 01/31/2005 10:50:09 AM PST by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack

Hang 'em High!


10 posted on 01/31/2005 10:50:11 AM PST by blackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: byteback
. . . argued that the IRS followed improper procedure by launching its exam before the group filed its 2004 tax return.

Seems like they are getting a chance to do the right thing (I ain't holdi' muh breathe tho..) and claim the political activity and pay taxes...

11 posted on 01/31/2005 10:50:26 AM PST by trebb ("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
From my site earlier today:
The NAACP has formally notified the Internal Revenue Service that it will not be cooperating with an IRS investigation regarding activities that might cost the civil rights organization their tax exempt status. The NAACP insists that the timing of the investigation is politically motivated.

In a letter to the IRS dated this past Thursday, the NAACP attorneys said they would not hand over documents the IRS has requested, and countered with charges that the IRS had not followed proper procedure by launching their investigation prior to the filing of the organization's 2004 tax return.

The letter said the tax examiners aimed to influence the group's activities just before the November presidential election.

"We must conclude that the intention was to chill appropriate voter registration and get-out-the-vote efforts, whether conducted by the NAACP or by other organizations that are targeted by similar examinations in the program," they wrote.

The NAACP said the IRS challenged as improper campaign intervention a Bond speech this summer because it condemned the president's policies on education, the economy and the war in Iraq.

The IRS has indicated that they are looking at 60 different non-profit organizations and churches to determine if they had violated federal rules prohibiting them from political campaign activity.

Bond had made speeches (including a major speech before the NAACP's National Convention last summer) that implied an endorsement of Democratic candidates over the Bush Administration. Bond has also made speeches denouncing the President and the Administration.

I made the statement nearly two years ago on MSNBC that Bond's statements and speeches had opened the door, and that it could potentially be bad for the organization. I'll repeat that here and now -- Bond's foot-in-mouth disease is what brought this on, and may cause the downfall of the entire organization. Unfortunately, if that does happen, I'll look for Bond and the rest of the Soul Patrol to immediately cry racism and try to blame conservatives in general and the Bush Administration in particular for this series of events.


Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

12 posted on 01/31/2005 10:51:23 AM PST by mhking (Do not mess with dragons, for thou art crunchy & good with ketchup...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking; Southack

Well now if it was political before, now it's on principle.

It's hard to believe the IRS would back off now.


13 posted on 01/31/2005 11:00:53 AM PST by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: swheats

The ironic aspect is that the NAACP is such a bad manager of money that it is unlikely to make any profits on which to be taxed. The smart play would have been to have forfeited their tax exempt status after Bond's speeches...the consequences would merely have been to have paid taxes on organizational profits (if any).

Now they are risking jail and asset confiscation, along with appearing in public as defiant blowhards.

They chose a decidedly unclever strategy. Perhaps they've grown accustomed to such tactics working in other fields, but that hardly makes such sillyness the thing to bet your organization on...against the IRS.

14 posted on 01/31/2005 11:06:50 AM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: byteback

Now if the IRS would just go after Je$$e Jack$on's Rainbow/Push and the NEA...


15 posted on 01/31/2005 11:22:11 AM PST by upchuck ("If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
The importance of the tax exempt status is not so the NAACP avoids paying taxes on profits (as a non-profit it technically doesn't have any) but so the people who contribute to it can take the money donated off of their taxes.

If the NAACP was deemed to be a political action committee they would receive a lot less money.
16 posted on 01/31/2005 11:24:55 AM PST by Purple GOPer (If you can't convince them, confuse them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Southack

There would be another, very serious consequence. The NAACP, like many other so-called "charities," is an active political organization, although it is a 501(c)(3) organization. 501(c)(3) organizations are generally prohibited from supporting or opposing political candidates (an absolute prohibition) and are more generally prohibited from lobbying, subject to a group of complex conditions and formulas. A 501(c)(3) organization gains a tremendous double benefit from that status: 1) the people and organizations that contribute to 501(c)(3) entities are allowed to deduct those contributions from their taxable income and 2) a 501(c)(3) doesn't have to pay taxes on any "profits" it makes from activities related to its charitable purpose.

Thus, although the NAACP might not have any "profits" to be taxed even if it were a for profit organization, it would still be terribly injured by losing its 501(C)(3) status, since its contributors could be subject to taxes on contributions they had already made and deducted and on future contributions. Most of the major corporations in the U.S. presently contribute tribute to the NAACP and deduct it and are able to appoint members to the NAACP board. If this IRS injury goes forward, it will have a huge impact on the NAACP's contributors who, in turn, put might apply serious pressure on the NAACP to moderate its Marxist positions.

A successful IRS challenge to the NAACP will also be a powerful warning to the numerous other left wing 501(c)(3) organizations that are and have been abusing their tax exempt status and induce them to moderate their positions.


17 posted on 01/31/2005 11:38:42 AM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Purple GOPer; libstripper

Nice point about NAACP donors caring about their tax exempt status.

Thanks for that additional wisdom.

18 posted on 01/31/2005 11:41:37 AM PST by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

Jesse Jackson and his sons' organizations should be investigated fully.

His shake-down operations are as corrupt as corrupt can be.

I have friends, black ministers in Chicago, who have been working for four years to try and draw attention to this.

They even picket the PUSH HQ regularly. In fact, they just did it again about 3 hours ago.

The Jackson political operations here are a hollow shell. Their meetings are sparsely attended.

Our people, conservatives, are working to fill that vacuum.

They need to be taken down from the top down, and replaced from the bottom up.


19 posted on 01/31/2005 11:49:51 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Freedom. Brought to you by the grace of God and the Red, White and Blue...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: byteback

NAACP is untouchable and they know it. GOP and RINOs are whimps and wouldnt do a damn thing to them. Lawbreaking is legal as long as your part of a minority group - can you say illegal immigration.


20 posted on 01/31/2005 11:50:27 AM PST by sasafras (sasafras (The road to hell is paved with good intentions))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson