Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas Group Takes Aim at Splenda's Campaign of Misinformation
Yahoo News ^ | 31 Jan 2005 | Texas Consumer Association

Posted on 01/31/2005 8:19:42 AM PST by ladtx

Press Release

Source: Texas Consumer Association

Texas Group Takes Aim at Splenda's Campaign of Misinformation
Monday January 31, 11:01 am ET

Texas Consumer Association Asks the FTC to Investigate

AUSTIN, Texas, Jan. 31 /PRNewswire/ -- The Texas Consumer Association today asked the U.S. Federal Trade Commission to investigate the misleading and deceptive marketing campaign being conducted by Johnson & Johnson's McNeil Nutritionals for its artificial sweetener Splenda.

By continually using the word "sugar" in its advertisements and in its packaging, McNeil is attempting to link Splenda and sugar in consumers' minds and convince consumers that Splenda is somehow "more natural" -- and therefore more healthy -- than any other artificial sweetener or food additive.

"With consumers across the country concerned about their health and trying to eat more natural foods, it is alarming that McNeil is engaged in an underhanded campaign to confuse consumers into believing Splenda is natural," commented Sandra Haverlah, president of the Texas Consumer Association.

The Texas Consumer Association asked the FTC to step in and mandate that McNeil provide consumers with accurate and truthful information about Splenda.

McNeil has no foundation for the claims it is making in its deceptive ads, since Splenda is not a natural derivative of sugar. What's more, it is not even necessary to use sugar to manufacture Splenda.

"McNeil's campaign is a sham," Haverlah asserted. "It's time for the FTC to investigate."

McNeil's deception, however, has begun to have a significant impact: Splenda has grabbed almost 40% of the U.S. consumer sweetener market, taking market share not just from artificial sweeteners, but also from natural sugar.

Splenda's success in the marketplace comes as Texas and the rest of the country grapple with a growing obesity crisis. Thirty-five percent of children in Texas are overweight or obese, according to the Texas Agriculture Commission, and childhood obesity in Texas has doubled over the past 20 years.

Haverlah said that many consumers are purchasing Splenda based on a belief that it is in some way "more natural" than -- and therefore preferable to -- other artificial sweeteners or food additives.

"Consumers should be given the truth about the products they buy and eat, and McNeil is trying to pull the wool over consumers' eyes," Haverlah continued. "This campaign of misinformation must be stopped."

Sandra Haverlah, President of Texas Consumer Association, sent the following letter, dated Jan. 31, to the Division of Advertising Practices, Bureau of Consumer Protection, at the Federal Trade Commission:

Consumers in Texas and across the country deserve to be told the truth about the food they eat and the products they buy. That's why it's so alarming that throughout the course of its marketing campaign, Johnson & Johnson company McNeil Nutritionals has been attempting to confuse consumers into believing that its artificial sweetener Splenda is a natural product by linking Splenda to sugar. It's up to the Federal Trade Commission to ensure that the information provided to us through advertising is accurate. The Texas Consumer Association therefore asks the FTC to fully investigate this misleading advertising campaign and stop McNeil from continuing its campaign of misinformation.

By continually using the word "sugar" in its advertisements and in its packaging, McNeil is attempting to link Splenda and sugar in consumers' minds. But McNeil has no foundation for its claims. Splenda isn't natural. On the contrary, it is a man-made artificial sweetener formed by a complex chemical reaction.

With obesity at an all-time high in the U.S. and the low-carbohydrate diet phenomenon remaining strong, Splenda has grabbed almost 40% of the U.S. consumer sweetener market share. An increasing number of consumers are purchasing Splenda based on their belief that it is in some way "more natural" -- and therefore more healthy -- than any other artificial sweetener or food additive.

Consumers need to understand that developing good, healthy eating habits will lead to weight loss. This is especially important for children, who are developing eating habits they will carry with them throughout life. Thirty- five percent of children in Texas are overweight or obese, according to the Texas Agriculture Commission. Childhood obesity in Texas has doubled over the past 20 years. These are startling statistics.

Luckily, Texas schools have started to take constructive steps toward helping students eat better. Like the latest edition of the U.S. Dietary Guidelines, the state of Texas is recommending eating natural, whole grain foods, fruits and vegetables.

Given the state and national push for healthy, natural foods, it is greatly disturbing that McNeil would try to confuse and mislead consumers into believing that Splenda is natural. Even more troubling, many of Splenda's new advertisements focus on children and many of the new foods that include Splenda are juices, cereals, and snacks children tend to eat. In its recent letter to the FTC on this topic, Generation Green noted that these ads aim to encourage children to eat low-sugar products suggesting that "low sugar" and "with Splenda" means the product is healthier. The Texas Consumer Association shares Generation Green's concern that this misleading marketing campaign is hindering the ability of parents to make informed, health-guided decisions about the food they buy for their families.

It's time for McNeil to stop misleading the public. The Texas Consumer Association strongly urges the FTC to investigate this advertising campaign and instruct McNeil to tell the truth about Splenda.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: splenda; sucralose
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: jsmith48
Does it cause cancer like the other ones do?

Yes, but don't worry, you wont know about that for another 15-20 years.

41 posted on 01/31/2005 9:16:23 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeeRushToldU_So

Then maybe the Consumers Group is actually an anti-nuke group.


42 posted on 01/31/2005 9:19:33 AM PST by grassboots.org (No "We Should Kill All Jews" Signs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

Stevia has a flavor, which is fine with me in tea or something but in coffee...ick!
I suppose I should learn to drink my coffee black/no sugar, like a man....
sundero


43 posted on 01/31/2005 9:24:32 AM PST by brytlea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ladtx

Texas Consumer Association = trial lawyers brainwashing future members of juries.


44 posted on 01/31/2005 9:25:08 AM PST by RicocheT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladtx
On Dr. Atkins' last TV interview with Larry King, King asked him what artificial sweetener Atkins preferred. Atkins said that Splenda was the best sugar substitute out there. Take that for what it's worth.

-PJ

45 posted on 01/31/2005 9:26:14 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladtx

My wife is a psych major and had to do an experiment with rats in Rat-Lab. She tested the rats to see if they would choose Sugar (nutritional) vs Splenda (no nutritional value). The rats couldn't tell them apart. I think she should either publish her paper or sell it to Splenda. We like Splenda. We are both doing Atkins and it works!


46 posted on 01/31/2005 9:34:07 AM PST by Conan the Librarian (The Best in Life is to crush my enemies, see them driven before me, and the Dewey Decimal System)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladtx

I've been using Splenda since 2001 and have had no problems with it. Splenda is made from sugar, it tastes like sugar and does somewhat cook like sugar.

For me, it's worth it. I've managed to loose a great amount of weight, keep it off and am no longer a couch potato. I give some of the credit to this loss to using Splenda.

This group seems to have an agenda. Notice they do not give any evidence for supposed deceptive advertising of Splenda, just that it is deceptive. Their claim that linking Splenda to sugar falls flat when someone looks at how Splenda is made and from what (sucrose is sugar last time I took any organic bio or chem classes).

I'll stick to my bright yellow bags for daily sweeting needs, thank you very much!!!


47 posted on 01/31/2005 9:37:31 AM PST by Brytani ("Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work - Edison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladtx
Haverlah said that many consumers are purchasing Splenda based on a belief that it is in some way "more natural" than -- and therefore preferable to -- other artificial sweeteners or food additives.

I use it because it TASTES better than the other artificial sweeteners, and I don't want the calories and carbs of sugar.

48 posted on 01/31/2005 9:42:40 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

http://befreetech.com/aspartame.htm

Aspartame is a toxic substance - many chemists consider it a poison.


49 posted on 01/31/2005 9:45:50 AM PST by cinives (On some planets what I do is considered normal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RicocheT

Texas Consumer Association was once run by Jim Hightower, and is basically a bunch of lefty, tree-hugging, Austin based nutcakes.

In other words - aging, embittered hippies with little to do in a state run by Republicans.

Note that the press realease doesn't argue with the benefits of Splenda, only that it is "not natural".


50 posted on 01/31/2005 9:48:06 AM PST by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

Me,too....I recall a run-in with a bag of sugar-free gummy bears,and afterwards I felt like that cartoon character that swallows a big bomb.....KA-POW!
That pretty much did it. :P


51 posted on 01/31/2005 9:50:07 AM PST by gimme1ibertee ("......Don't be afraid of the lemur!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cinives

I agree. It builds up levels in your body over time that can affect many things. I have friends affected.


52 posted on 01/31/2005 9:50:53 AM PST by OB1kNOb (Imagine if there were no hypothetical situations......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: SeaDragon

Splenda ping


53 posted on 01/31/2005 9:51:42 AM PST by RikaStrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cinives
That article is full of pure quackery with quotes from environmentalists and "doctors" who are "detoxifying" their patients. Do you have a link to a scientific study that proves aspartame is dangerous?

Note the nutty links on the page you posted.

Snopes articles on aspartame

54 posted on 01/31/2005 9:55:26 AM PST by stinkerpot65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ladtx

I don't know. After getting splitting headaches from Aspartame, I've been afraid to try any artificial sugars. I'm learning to love the taste of foods and drinks without it--or splurge once in awhile when chocolate cake becomes irresistable. (But only once in awhile!)


55 posted on 01/31/2005 9:57:09 AM PST by MizSterious (First, the journalists, THEN the lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conan the Librarian

dogs will drink anti-freeze till they die. It tastes sweet. Do rats appreciate Haute Cuisene better than dogs?


56 posted on 01/31/2005 9:59:15 AM PST by Vaquero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: brytlea
What is maltitol?
57 posted on 01/31/2005 10:18:55 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Maltitol is a sugar alcohol, and is not counted in the carb count of a food (for low card dieting purposes). I guess because it's not digested? I'm not positive about that. But it may have, as it says, a ''laxative'' effct. Well, you better believe they aren't just whistling Dixie when they say that!!!!
It's in most of the low carb candies you will find out there.
sundero


58 posted on 01/31/2005 10:21:22 AM PST by brytlea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

Thanks for the info.


59 posted on 01/31/2005 10:24:08 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: ladtx

I've read that Splenda is one of the few sweeteners that doesn't cause an insulin spike like Nutrasweet does. For that reason it is hailed by the Atkins followers.


60 posted on 01/31/2005 10:24:59 AM PST by avg_freeper (Gunga galunga. Gunga, gunga galunga)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson