According to Michael Jackson's mother, this is not his fault.
It was someone else.
Jackson's actions since all of this began have been defiant. That says to me that he actually believes he has done nothing wrong. It is so painfully obvious by the evidence so far that something highly inappropriate and most likely, criminal has been going on with him. I understand his family's need to defend him, but honestly, you have to at some point face reality. Some things are indefensable.
Okay... Was it a magazine, or a movie?
That's right, just because he has (according to news reports) this large bed in his room that he fills up with young boys and himself doesn't mean anything. Hell just because he has all this child porn laying around doesn't mean anything.
Michael Faggotson Jackson is a predatory pedophile that uses his wealth and fame to buy his way outta jail. If he were any other, he would've been in prison a long time ago.
This pedophile needs to be taken off the streets, permanently.
And the parents who knowingly sold their kids for a weekend with Jackson in exchange for cash need to be arrested.
And, this is a suprise to whom???
Whacko-Jacko doesn't get it . . . . and doesn't learn from the past.
Get ready for another OJ trial.
Is there anyone on the planet that thinks this freak is innocent?
People are beginning to say, they'll never charge him. That's the buzz I hear.
What is almost as sickening is that all the people he supports financially are harboring him and allowing it to continue - including the idiots who allow their children to be around him!
I don't see any source cited for this claim, not even an 'anonymous spokesperson'. Since Jackson, for all practical purposes, can't sue Court TV for defamation, we might want to be a little careful believing this.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/01/26/earlyshow/leisure/celebspot/main669375.shtml
...Court TV Executive Investigative Editor Diane Dimond has been following the story.
She tells The Early Show co-anchor Rene Syler that the book, called "The Boy, A Photographic Essay" was seized from Neverland in 1993.
On the front cover is a photo of a naked boy looking out at the sea. It's a coffee table book, and the experts that I have questioned about it…said this book serves two purposes. Number one, self-gratification for a pedophile and number two, it opens up a dialogue for someone who's looking for a target. They go through the book, and there are many nice pictures of boys at play, at work, in the fields and studying at school.
" 'Look at these pictures,' " Dimond suggests a pedophile might say. " 'Look at this. Oh, they're skinny dipping. Would you like to skinny dip with me?' So it's used as a recruitment tool."
Since it's a coffee table book, couldn't it be seen simply as an art book, Syler asked.
"Absolutely," Dimond responded. "It could be. However, as you turn the pages, beginning on about page 25, suddenly you're struck by these completely nude little boys, in strange, provocative poses, laying on a rock with the waterfall falling on top of them. And the mental health professionals that deal with pedophiles that I talked to were very disturbed by the book."
Dimond explains that the prosecution wants two different collections of items admitted into evidence: the group of evidence taken in 1993; that investigation was cut short, because the victim's family took money, but they gathered evidence. Now, prosecutors want the '93 evidence plus the 2003 evidence taken from Neverland.
"And I will tell you, I have gotten to look at some of the search warrants, and what they got out of Michael Jackson's bedroom this time is stunning. There was a box of pornographic magazines at the end of bed. Dvd movies of porn (in various rooms and closets). …Pornographic materials and pictures of naked boys in several rooms of that home."
(snip)
I found it interesting that the article said it would be OK if a photography enthusiast had the "Boy: A Photographic Essay" book. Based on how it was described, I cannot fathom why anyone besides pedophiles would be interested in such a book. I can't even believe it was allowed to be published in the first place.
'bout darn time...
sorry Mikey...this one's gonna be expensive.
I am very concerned about the upcoming trial of Micahel Jackson. I know that everyone is innocent until proven guilty, but I already believe him to be guilty. What I am afraid of is an "OJ" type of trial where the jury is so enraptured by a celebrity that they aquit him. I think the legal term is jury nullification. Regardless of what evidence the prosecution presents, the jury will not find him guilty. If he is not convicted in this trial then any future legal actions taken against him will be refuted as the "man" having a vendetta against Jackson, making him virtually immune from any future arrest and trial. He would then be almost free to continue his abuse of young boys.
What's next? DNA tests on the pages when they get them unstuck?
Or .. they show the pictures of the little boys to other little boys as a way of proving that IT'S OKAY - SEE .. OTHER BOYS DO IT .. that type of thing.
I'll never be convinced Jackson is anything but a child molester!
"Pimp's Up, Ho's Down" is hardly a porn movie. Ain't nutin wrong with Mr. Whitefolks.