Posted on 01/28/2005 7:29:42 AM PST by presidio9
I ordered "State of Fear" from Amazon earlier this week.
I hope this one becomes a best seller and a movie.
Just for new folks and those who haven't read this:
http://www.oism.org/pproject/
This site is operated by Dr. Fredick Seitz, former head of the National Academy of Sciences. Seems that he, and over 19,000 (no, that's not a typo - thousand) scientists disagree with the usual doggerel about SUV's and evil America and thoughtless humanity farting up the earth's atomosphere. Note, too, that virtually all of the signatories have degrees in the earth sciences and most of whom hold advanced degrees and doctorates.
In short, one hell of a lot of informed people that disagree with the deeply 'scientific' Knight-Ridder selection of 18 whoevers.
Articles like this never seem to mention that even the scientific board convened by the UN on climate change did NOT endorse human-causality theory in climate change. Of course, the UN leadership sought to spin things this way and in their last report, the media was even bold enough to ignore what the report actually said and a press conference was convened to repudiate the mass media distortions - to no avail and conveniently ignored.
Dr. Patrick Moore, one of the seven founders of Greenpeace, has also seen the light and is now working for sane policies based on sound conservation and resource use. He has said that today's environmentalists are the equivalent of scientifically ignorant Nazis. Of course, he is routinely sent death threats and stalked by the enlightened Left.
Well, given the increasingly sensible climate induced by leadership that isn't pandering to global reallignment of national resources and sovereignty, I think we can look forward to increasing information flows and sane policy that will effectively put the dampers on the hysterical environmentalist propaganda.
That's all for now. I gotta go gas up my Stihl chainsaw and cut some wood to burn.
If only he had remembered to include well-developed characters and plausible situations. I think the overall badness of the novel will obscure the important point he was trying to make.
I had to force myself through this book (because people were talking about it) but I agree that the scene where Martin Scheen gets eaten was a beautiful moment. I also enjoyed when he got his ass kicked by a girl.
LOL, I love it when the lying fearmonger environuts are accused of lying and fear mongering......they really hate it when the truth is told.
They forgot to mention 2002 was the coldest winter in US history.
I'd guess that volcanoes, both above ground and in the ocean contribute to NATURAL global warming more than a few billion people with technology.
It's a man against creation mentality...that we can fix what's "WE THINK" is wrong with the workings of "Universe".
But we still have hurricanes, we still have volcanic eruptions, we still have the release of huge amounts of methane from the seas.
Man can only be a compensator whose job is to help the unfortunates who were in the path of mother nature.
I think perhaps that a good way of looking at this is taking the entire population AND it's improvements and reducing them perspectively to size of the universe. It would be a dot!!
As for the 5 degree increase in temperature, let those people at the end of the century worry about it. I'm sure they'll still be collecting social security from that "no problems here - lock box". Bwahahaha
I'll take Harvard over NYU any day.
And accurate global records have been kept for what, fifty years?
And the so-called records are not being fudged by those with an agenda?
Knight Ridder engaged in another factually-incorrect, logically-suspect "appeal to authority" in the absence of facts.
What are the chances that, if a refutation to the naysayers of global warming existed, it wouldn't be trumpeted from every rooftop at top volume?
There is at least one extemely well known scientist that agrees with Crichton. Dr. Kary Mullis, winner of the Nobel Prize in chemistry, has placed "State of Fear" on his recommended reading list.
My impression is that articles such as this, which always claim a consensus, are misleading, I don't at all think there is a consensus in favor of global warming theories.
Further, I think there is no distortion of scientists' work in the book, it merely shows the work from another point of view. For instance, Chrichton makes sure to point out that Hansen believes in global warming.
Have you noticed a change in international climat description?
It used to be: prevent Global warming. It has changed to prevent Climate change.
It seems that they want to be able to hedge their bets, since it is more likely that we may be moving toward a mini Ice-age era.
That's because everyone and his brother scoffs at the words "global warming" as it has been discredited and laughed at.
Wow, this is just like the reaction the press had to "The Day After Tomorrow", the sci-fi disaster flick released last summer. NOT
In the film global warming caused NYC to flood then freeze solid in a few short hours.
THe Lefties embraced the film, the media gave it a wink and a nod and Algore and the MoveOnMorons all showed up at the premiere.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.