Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: presidio9
I'm not a huge Crichton fan, but the difference between this book and "The Day After Tomorrow" is that Crichton actually researched the topic, and included footnotes for all the sceintific points he made.

If only he had remembered to include well-developed characters and plausible situations. I think the overall badness of the novel will obscure the important point he was trying to make.

24 posted on 01/28/2005 7:50:57 AM PST by jalisco555 ("The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity." W. B. Yeats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: jalisco555

Chrichton tends to leave loose ends untied and use the same plot repeatedly, but I enjoyed this book and think it better than most of the best sellers out there, the majority of which I can't stand. Which means most people will not be offended by its literary quality.


44 posted on 01/28/2005 8:13:37 AM PST by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson