Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

. . . I can see the "Select Committee on the US-PRC War of 2009" noting how, in a blind rush to dedicate limited intel assets to the GWOT, we back-burnered the Taiwan issue and, as such, we caught by surprise about many of the PLA's early moves.
1 posted on 01/27/2005 8:46:20 PM PST by BroncosFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: BroncosFan
"China is playing with fire, and it's uncertain how many Chinese leaders are even aware of how dangerous a game they are involved in."

This I think is a very serious potential problem. Large scale arrogance and ignorance on the part of military and political leadership.
2 posted on 01/27/2005 8:55:26 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead (I believe in American Exceptionalism! Do you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BroncosFan
Moreover, China has nuclear weapons, and the temptation to threaten use of nukes if more powerful American forces do not back off. China is playing with fire, and it's uncertain how many Chinese leaders are even aware of how dangerous a game they are involved in.

Dangerous for them. They use even one nuke and its all over for China.

3 posted on 01/27/2005 9:00:49 PM PST by Paul_Denton (Shoot first and ask questions later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BroncosFan

There is a chance that China might even get into a conflict with Russia over the oil rich Siberian region not to mention its tussle with Japan, India and Vietnam. India and US control the shipping lanes that is so vital for China. For now China has just too many problems surrounding it but China has been playing it smart here. It props up proxies to taken on its other enemies: N Korea to take on Japan and Pakistan to take on India while China itself will wait for its time to come and the American power to fall. And after that a powerful (nuclear)China will make its first move.

America must strike out China now and with minimum use of force put it out of economic competition for next 30 years. The best way to do that is to provoke China or limit its economic, military or diplomatic options into making it do something stupid.


7 posted on 01/27/2005 9:53:45 PM PST by Gengis Khan ("There is no glory in incomplete action." -- Gengis Khan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BroncosFan

It is true that there is a danger here. But I wonder just how much. China depends on the U.S. for trade. They would surely be hesitant to risk an embargo that could seriously cripple their economy. OTOH, corruption is so widespread and endemic, that many peasants are not happy. Governments have started wars before to take citizens' minds off of their domestic problems.


11 posted on 01/27/2005 10:20:09 PM PST by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: risk; soccer8; borghead; rightwing2; US_MilitaryRules; Libertarianize the GOP; ...

PING


12 posted on 01/27/2005 11:21:47 PM PST by Dr. Marten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson