Posted on 01/27/2005 6:11:18 PM PST by w6ai5q37b
SM, Not only has that changed, but our trade agreements thus far are NOT "treaties". They have been given to the whole of Congress for an "up or down" vote. Not just the senate. Peace and love, George.
It seems to be starting with the globalization of commerce. Make no mistake that is not the end objective! If it were, the erosion of the Second Amendment would have no value beyond mere liberalism. The final objective is a true erasure of international borders. A surrender of sovereignty to the UN and the total dismantlement of the US Constitution. To do that requires the UN have a powerful standing army and that it's future subjects have no means to resist effectively.
One part is being accomplished in the public schools. Their globalist agenda is brainwashing kids into thinking that guns are evil and so is anyone who even wants to keep a gun in their home. I know this for a fact, I've been a teacher in the public high schools for sixteen years. But it's not enough to do this and let the old guard die off. That's why I think that the UN agenda is going to be jump started sooner. They don't want to wait a generation to let the happen in a natural fashion. They want what they want and they want it right now.
True enough but that does not mean that the treaty making powers or their effect on our laws has faded. Say a US President were to make a treaty with the UN to totally disarm the American population as a sign to the UN community that America wished to be a true partner in global peace....(barf!) Ratification of such a treaty would cut across the US Constitution as part of the aforementioned mechanism and make it a lawful part of our lives. Whether we would let it stand as such without taking up arms is another matter. Hence the moves to unilateral personal disarmament we currently see.
A typical move we can expect from the Democraps, should they ever return to power in the Executive and legislative branch at the same time. God help us if they ever control all three branches at the same time with the DEAN brand of political theory ascendant.
Actually, as of right now treaties DO in fact supercede the Constitution. Bills introduced in the 1950's to rectify this were defeated.
It has been discussed here on Free Republic.
It is one reason not to ratify things like the Kyoto Accords. They would put the Congress and law enforcement into a hammerlock unless or until the US formally withdrew.
Best regards,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.