Posted on 01/25/2005 6:48:24 AM PST by Jean S
I'm shocked!
Methinks the RATs were gnawing on the wiring someplace.
And Wisconsin will continue to have election "errors"
and false validations until they do away with that
stupid practice of allowing the individual to register
on the very day of the elections!
The GOP needs to keep pounding away on this kind of fraud and not wait till the next election. Glad to see progress in several places.
Same-day registration is a boon to the cheating Dems. They can bus Illinois residents into Wisconsin and have two states won for the Dem candidate instead of one. Someone needs to clean up this mess, send some Democrats to jail and institute registration reform so Wisconsin's elections may someday be more legitimate than those in Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Washington.
Yeah, some ... like those voting illegally. Someone in the Wisconsin legislature should read back all the blather about Ohio given in Congress and then conclude, "you might think they're talking about Ohio, but in reality they are talking about Wisconsin." In fact, that would make a great commercial to be used in places where election reform is a ballot issue.
Same problem in Minnesota. Personally, at this point I blame the Republicans for allowing such obvious corruptions to continue. In this confused state, all a RAT voter needs is to have another RAT in a precinct come and swear thaat his/her friend lives in the precinct - no ID needed. RATs set it up and continue to benefit, but Republicans seem to stand by with their thumbs up their @sses.
If the numbers can be extrapolated out, it might well be.
I'm not dumb enough to believe these are the only invalid votes in that state.
Now what was the margin again?
This appears to be due to cases where cards from those who presented identification and registered on election day could not be processed
While those who register on election day have to present valid identification, it is impossible to check on the spot if the address provided is valid.
I'm pretty certain it's not true that they have to present identification. Haven't I read that they can simply have "someone" attest for them? I'm pretty sure I read of instances where the van driver was attesting for each of his passengers.
Sheesh. Was there some kind of coordination between Milwaukee and WA state Rat election officials?! The similarities are eerie.
It looks to me like the GOP could FORCE the gov to sign voter I.D. requirments while the spotlight is on this. While they're at it, same day registrants should be required to bring a COPY of their photo I.D. with them if they want to register at the polls. The copy then must be stapled to their registration form so there can be no later claims that the info was "illegible" (fake).
Yes, but such a change has to take place in the State
Legislative bodies. And the states involved are
Democrat Party controlled. The only avenue open is
to convince the voters to overthrow the Democrat
majority in those states.
National voter i.d. cards anyone?
Perhaps they should do this in Seattle? The Times and PI are sleeping on the job....
I've always been a little agnostic on national I.D. cards...similar to a passport. And I don't think there's much hope of passing it anyway.
But two things have caused me to lean more towards such a provision: voter fraud and illegal immigration. I'm becoming more convinced a national I.D. card is the way to go.
Despite all the DUmmyWailing, Democrats will fight voting reform tooth and nail if it contains provisions to really eliminate fraud. The bottom line is that every single one of these quick-and-easy and/or election-day registration procedures need to be trashed. Voting is a serious thing and the process to validate voters should be thorough, but that's exactly what they DON'T want. To them, voter reform is being able to drag homeless ex-cons directly off the street and into the precinct where a poll worker can instantly help them cast their vote.
The good news on this issue, however, is that their positions won't stand the light of day. These issues aren't complex and loaded with ways to cloud the core elements of the debate. The masses can understand the issue of proving who you are in order to vote, and the Democrats' typical subterfuge is gonna reveal their true motives pretty quickly.
MM
Tells ya a little something about instant registration, doesn't it? Sheesh...
My position is that it's important to count everyone's vote. So important, that precautions must be in place to ensure that only valid votes are counted!
Each state must have such a list [new statewide voter list] in place under a federal law passed after the 2000 election. Wisconsin’s is to be completed late this year. It will be set up so that if a voter moves to a new community, that person’s name would automatically be dropped from the previous address.
As it stands now, names can be left on the list for years, leaving the door open for someone to fraudulently vote from the address or to identify himself or herself as someone else and vote. It is impossible to detect that sort of fraud through a computer review such as this one.
Impossible to detect that sort of fraud through a computer review, but rather easy to detect that sort of fraud with a photo ID requirement.
Hmmm, wonder why the dems don't want that, to the point of vetoing it every time it comes up. . .?
The Republicans need to expose this and get the laws set up so that Rats cannot steel the election.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.