Posted on 01/24/2005 8:30:54 AM PST by longshadow
Tigers, snowmobiles, Sudafed: There oughta (not) be a law
Sunday, January 23, 2005
By Bill Winter
Here's the best legal advice you'll get in 2005: Don't let your pet tiger drive a snowmobile across a not-quite-frozen lake and then buy three packages of Sudafed at a drugstore. If you do, you'll get into hot water.
Which is defined as water that's at least 120 degrees. In Louisiana, anyway.
If that doesn't make any sense, you haven't been following news reports about all the state laws that went into effect on Jan. 1. That's right. Laws regulating pet tigers, snowmobiles, cold medicine, and hot water took effect on New Year's Day - along with hundreds of other laws in 19 states.
It's a tough call, but the most eye-rollingly foolish one may be Louisiana's "hot" water decree. According to politicians, Louisiana faced an ominous threat: the hot water in some laundromats wasn't hot enough. (I'll pause while you gasp in horror.) Some folks complained that their clothes weren't getting clean.
The solution? It's obvious, isn't it? Let the free market work. If customers aren't happy with the hot water at a laundromat, they'll find a better facility. Eventually, good laundromats with satisfactorily hot water will get more business and bad ones will go bankrupt. Right?
You must not be from Louisiana. The correct answer is: pass a new law. So they did. Now, every Louisiana laundromat is required to produce 120-degree water for its washing machines. If they don't, the owner must post a sign saying, "Hot water not available." Presumably, thermometer-wielding police will enforce the law, instead of wasting their time solving murders.
New Hampshire faced a different crisis. Bored by the approximately 11 months of winter they endure each year, some state residents were driving their snowmobiles at high speed across iced-over lakes and then "skimming" across patches of open water. For those who didn't drown, this was allegedly fun.
State politicians weren't amused. So they passed a law making skimming illegal. "The new law against skimming will save lives," a Fish and Game Department employee solemnly told the Concord Monitor. Sure it will. Because lunatics who ride snowmobiles over open water in frigid weather are exactly the kind of thoughtful citizens most likely to obey such laws.
Then there's the tiger problem. In 2003, a knucklehead living in a tiny Harlem apartment was hospitalized after his pet - a 400-pound Bengal tiger - gnawed his arm and leg. New York politicians, eager to solve a problem that occurs, on average, once in a lifetime, passed a law making it a crime to keep wild animals as pets. To put, ahem, teeth into the law, they levied a $500 fine for the first offense.
Consider the thinking: The possibility of having limbs chewed into human tartare by a tiger's razor-sharp teeth is not enough to prevent people from keeping savage jungle cats as pets. But a $500 fine - ah, that will do the trick.
Finally, there's cold medicine. In Illinois, it's now a crime to buy more than two packages of over-the-counter cold medication at a time. Such medicines (like Sudafed) contain pseudoephedrine, which, when combined with other chemicals and criminal intent, can produce methamphetamine. Since previous laws designed to stamp out "meth" hadn't succeeded, politicians figured that one more regulation would do the trick. And since those other laws, which targeted drug manufacturers and dealers, had failed, legislators cleverly turned their sights on people with colds, who now risk criminal charges if they try to stock up on medicine.
All this raises an obvious question. Why do politicians pass such foolish laws? That's easy. It's what politicians do. And American politicians do it more than almost anyone else.
Consider: on New Year's Day, 88 new laws went into effect in China, according to the Financial Express newspaper. That's China, which has 1.3 billion people. The totalitarian Communist nation. Where its rulers have traditionally controlled every aspect of citizen's lives. Yet, only 88 new laws were required to keep China functioning smoothly for another year.
By contrast, politicians in North Carolina last year passed 216 new laws. In Pennsylvania, lawmakers cranked out "nearly 240 bills," according to the Associated Press. In Louisiana, the Legislature enacted a whopping 930 new laws at its regular session - and then, realizing that the job wasn't quite done, passed 14 more at a special session. California politicians, not to be outdone, managed to pass "about 950 bills," according to the Sacramento Bee, before, presumably, collapsing from exhaustion. That's 2,350 new laws in just four states (leaving 46 other states where politicians were assuredly just as busy.)
What can be done? As a good American, my first thought was that we should pass a new law - making it illegal for politicians to pass so many new laws. Then I reconsidered. Because if the laws regulating pet tigers, snowmobiles, cold medicine, and hot water are any indication, new laws are not the solution. New laws are the problem.
Oops. Can I say that? Or is there a law against it? I better check.
Bill Winter is communications director for the Advocates for Self-Government, a Georgia-based, nonprofit, nonpartisan libertarian organization.
I am out of the loop here - who is Denny Crane?
Or at least give it cancer. Oh wait, we have politicians we actually pay to act as cancers. Never mind.
Wow; you're thinking just like a politician! Are you SURE you're not a member of the Louisiana Legislature?
;-)
Sad, isn't it?
Good thing you don't live in Southern California, where charcoal grills are verboten...
Don't be crabby.
I like your idea.
But the act of proposing it clearly disqualifies you from being a member of an "enlightened" legislature yearning to coddle the soiled masses from cradle to grave....
I'm sorry, but unless you are duly licensed by the state to practice Astrology, it is forbidden for you yo make astrological allusion on the internet. Someone could get hurt, you know!
< /Lunatic legislator mode>
So does georgia. This one not the ex-Soviet one.
I'd vote for that.
Then again, how about a new law making politicians illegal. lol
I'd vote for that too.
The solution is to put a per-word tax on legislation, to be paid by the legislators. A bill passes the House? That will be $439.07, from every member.
I have a hard time with the cold medicine law in CA. My 3 boys' ages necessitate the purchase of 3 different strengths of cold medicine, so when they all get colds I am prohibited from buying multiples of the 3 kinds of the medicine I want. (I do like to buy in bulk--their colds can last for 10 days easy!)
What I do is pick several different strengths of several different brands and take them all to the counter, hoping that I can patch together some combination that will pass muster. So the cashier takes away what I'm prohibited from buying.
The whole thing is pretty sad for a non-communist country.
What's with these Panhandle names? (Tula Ellice Finklea for example.)
Can I also complain about toilet laws?
When I'm pregnant my BMs get, um, really big and bulky--something about the digestive system slowing down.
Yesterday it took me THREE flushes, not two, to do my business without stopping up the toilet.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.