Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

***CPAC 2005 UPDATE***
AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION ^ | 1/24/2005 | Diotima

Posted on 01/24/2005 7:30:19 AM PST by diotima

Link to Tenative Schedule

Hotels in the CPAC Area:

Hotel Price per night Distance from CPAC
Four Points Sheraton
169.00
.5 miles
Club Quarters
160.00
.6 miles
Holiday Inn Downtown
129.00
.61 miles
Hamilton Crowne Plaza
159.00
.62 miles
Red Roof Inn Washington Downtown
114.00
.67 miles
Check Travelocity for Hotels

 



TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Announcements
KEYWORDS: booth; cpac; cpac2005; frn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last
To: Drango

Thanks for this info. A group of us FairTax supporters are already planning on lobbying Congress while we're here.


101 posted on 01/27/2005 9:41:53 AM PST by Badray ((Under construction))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
Hooray! See you there again!

Yup. I can hardly wait.

102 posted on 01/27/2005 10:03:34 AM PST by NeoCaveman (OK, so now who is the true evil genious Rove or Belicheck?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Barlowmaker

You are worse than a little school girl.

Why are you obsessed with me?

Have you considered professional help?

You should.


103 posted on 01/27/2005 10:10:28 AM PST by Badray ((Under construction))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

In reply to your post #91:

I can see that you understand my reasons for not supporting Specter. He was expendable.

My animus towards Santorum is deeper than what appears on the surface. He won his seat in Congress by challenging the incumbent for many of the things that he himself is now doing. He is a hypocrite. He backed the pro abort liberal over the pro life conservative. He betrayed those who brought him to the dance when he had a chance to advance the causes that claimed as his. Why? Was it poor political analysis? Was is purely for personal advancement and to protect his seat?

I don't know. Neither is acceptable to me.

Despite the rantings and harrassment of that schoolgirl who has made me the target of his obsession, I have said that Rick CAN redeem himself in the eyes of PA's conservatives, but that it will take more than fancy words at fundraisers. It will take true leadership, action, and the proper votes on the issues that matter. What Ricky needs to remember is that people he has angered the most are the grassroots activists that he needs to get out the vote for him.

Without that support, he is in trouble if he faces a guy like Bob Casey Jr who is a decent, pro life, pro gun Democrat. PA IS a Democrat state that favors traditional values. Casey can win if Ricky doesn't make amends.


104 posted on 01/27/2005 10:25:25 AM PST by Badray ((Under construction))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Badray
I have said that Rick CAN redeem himself in the eyes of PA's conservatives, but that it will take more than fancy words at fundraisers. It will take true leadership, action, and the proper votes on the issues that matter. What Ricky needs to remember is that people he has angered the most are the grassroots activists that he needs to get out the vote for him.

That is totally reasonable. Which I knew you would be, despite that realtively newbie poster who follows you around.

105 posted on 01/27/2005 10:31:54 AM PST by NeoCaveman (OK, so now who is the true evil genious Rove or Belicheck?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Reasonable people do understand.

That's why that stalker doesn't have a clue.

If a candidate sports the "R" flag, he'll salute.

I won't. You have to do more than wear an "R" to earn my vote.


106 posted on 01/27/2005 10:41:55 AM PST by Badray ((Under construction))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Badray
Ray Slurring Santorum
107 posted on 01/27/2005 11:05:05 AM PST by Barlowmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Do you find it reasonable that stalwart conservative Rick Santorum is either duplicitous, blackmailed, taking bribes or spineless? Do you associate yourself with those characterizations?


108 posted on 01/27/2005 11:20:37 AM PST by Barlowmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Barlowmaker

Beltwayitis - Some reps forget where they came from after too much time in the capitol.


109 posted on 01/27/2005 11:23:21 AM PST by Dan from Michigan ("We clearly screwed up on the communications," Detroit Mayor Kilpatrick - after caught in a lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan

Dan, you know none of that is true with Santorum. He's a Godsend in that cesspool.


110 posted on 01/27/2005 11:26:25 AM PST by Barlowmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Barlowmaker

Being stalwart would mean bravely sticking to your position in light of attacks against you and pressure to do otherwise for.

Where do you find anything to use that definition to explain little Ricky's action with respect to Specter?

If you still maintain that Ricky was a stalwart, then you must believe as I do that he is not a conservative because he surely didn't defend the positions that he has claimed as his own.

We know what he did. We don't know why he did?

In your deranged mind, are we not allowed to question a politician about his actions and motives?

Are we supposed to pledge our undying support to a pol despite what he does? If you believe that, then you are an even bigger fool than I imagined. If that are not punished in some way, how will they know not to cross us again?

Oh, I forgot. You only care about party power, not principle.

Sorry to have troubled you.

Now, will you quit following me and quit trying to highjack these threads to satisfy your obsession? If you think that I have committed some offense against FR rules, ping the mod. In the meantime, grow up.


111 posted on 01/27/2005 11:44:08 AM PST by Badray ((Under construction))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Barlowmaker
I thought you deleted your post #90 as not to highjack this thread into a 2004 PA Senate race redux.

Do you remember the first thing Specter said after getting the Judiciary Chairmanship it was something to the effect that his first prirority was to get Santorum re-elected. While that is the first thing that Specter and I have agreed upon in a decade, it does smell of quid pro quo.

D.C. is a rotten place and no one stays pure forever. With that said, I don't think it is reasonable expect our guys to be pure.

And I would certainly trade either of my "Republican" Senators (I'm from Ohio) for Rick

112 posted on 01/27/2005 11:48:06 AM PST by NeoCaveman (OK, so now who is the true evil genious Rove or Belicheck?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Badray

I'm not following you around. I came into the CPAC thread because it is a luminous annual conservative event and I know that FR has been an active participant over the years. And whattayaknow ... there you are making yourself the center of the party. I found it ironic considering I've observed your most recent ill-conceived campaign targeting an individual who happens to be a featured event speaker and admired Conservative stalwart. Yes, stalwart.


113 posted on 01/27/2005 11:55:05 AM PST by Barlowmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
I did delete my post in the sake of comity, but post 99 was over the top. This isn't about 04. It's about '06 and a counter-productive movement to remove Santorum from office in retribution for peceived slights and betrayals. That's nonconservative. Besides, this isn't a FR event, and I don't follow anyone from thread to thread. I get pinged into Specter threads by a mischevous instigator (jmc813) and I bite happily.

People who are going to CPAC are not going to have one less iota of party fun because of my comments here. Badray is a funloving and jocular guy. I just don't like the destructive (IMO) politics he plays.

114 posted on 01/27/2005 12:02:55 PM PST by Barlowmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Barlowmaker
It's about '06 and a counter-productive movement to remove Santorum from office in retribution for peceived slights and betrayals.

And such an '06 movement has only been mentioned (on this thread) by you. Badray has said he may vote for Rick. He has yet to lead some great anti-Santorum movement.

Oh, well at least we have served the purpose of keeping this thread bumped.

115 posted on 01/27/2005 12:30:11 PM PST by NeoCaveman (OK, so now who is the true evil genious Rove or Belicheck?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
He has yet to lead some great anti-Santorum movement.

Thanks for the chuckle. Bump to the top.

116 posted on 01/27/2005 12:50:45 PM PST by Barlowmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg; dubyaismypresident
Just received this via email:

What a lineup of conservative leaders!

Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, Pat Buchanan, Newt Gingrich, Ann Coulter, Zell Miller, Senators George Allen, Mitch McConnell, Jeff Sessions, Sam Brownback, John Sununu, Tom Coburn, Norm Coleman and Rick Santorum, Phyllis Schafly, Henry Hyde, Bob Barr, Oliver North, Michelle Malkin, Wayne LaPierre, Joe Scarborough, Michael Medved, the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.

All of these leaders, and more, are confirmed speakers at the 32nd annual Conservative Political Action Conference -- CPAC -- February 17-19 in the beautiful Ronald Reagan Building in Washington, DC.

117 posted on 01/27/2005 3:37:07 PM PST by NautiNurse (Osama bin Laden has more tapes than Steely Dan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Badray
That room is $129

How'd you swing that great rate? Offer a back rub or three to the reservations department?

118 posted on 01/27/2005 3:40:38 PM PST by NautiNurse (Osama bin Laden has more tapes than Steely Dan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

Thanks for the ping, Nutmeg. Will answer soon...


119 posted on 01/27/2005 4:37:11 PM PST by tgslTakoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: pjb819; Jimmy Valentine's brother; BillF; staytrue; BufordP; sinanju; Taxman; kristinn; ...
Hi, pjb- my long lost friend; it was so great to see you again at the Ball last week! Time was too short to catch up on everything, tho.

I sent you a Freepmail. Give me a call. Daytime on Saturday will be very busy for me, but maybe in the evening or on Sunday??

Of course there's always The Caucus Room, about 5 blocks from the JWM. Bar drinks are not much pricier than at the Marriott. Their food is exquisite, and prohibitively expensive - they have venison to die for, but don't ask the price.

Also, only two blocks away is Harry's, in the Hotel Harrington. Very affordable food, healthy servings (sandwiches w/chips, baskets o' fries, chili...), and they have a bar. I don't know the drink prices, but am pinging some who may know (not necessarily in any particular order).

120 posted on 01/27/2005 4:48:58 PM PST by tgslTakoma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-136 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson