Posted on 01/20/2005 9:33:31 PM PST by RWR8189
Was the president's speech a case of "mission inebriation"?
It was an interesting Inauguration Day. Washington had warmed up, the swift storm of the previous day had passed, the sky was overcast but the air wasn't painful in a wind-chill way, and the capital was full of men in cowboy hats and women in long furs. In fact, the night of the inaugural balls became known this year as The Night of the Long Furs.
Laura Bush's beauty has grown more obvious; she was chic in shades of white, and smiled warmly. The Bush daughters looked exactly as they are, beautiful and young. A well-behaved city was on its best behavior, everyone from cops to doormen to journalists eager to help visitors in any way.
For me there was some unexpected merriness. In my hotel the night before the inauguration, all the guests were evacuated at 1:45 in the morning. There were fire alarms and flashing lights on each floor, and a public address system instructed us to take the stairs, not the elevators. Hundreds of people wound up outside in the slush, eventually gathering inside the lobby, waiting to find out what next.
The staff--kindly, clucking--tried to figure out if the fire existed and, if so, where it was. Hundreds of inaugural revelers wound up observing each other. Over there on the couch was Warren Buffet in bright blue pajamas and a white hotel robe. James Baker was in trench coat and throat scarf. I remembered my keys and eyeglasses but walked out without my shoes. After a while the "all clear" came,
(Excerpt) Read more at opinionjournal.com ...
Buckley is a drama queen too
Then why did she change her tune from what she said on TV yesterday?
I wasn't aware of that.
Although I haven't read the Wall Street Journal in quite a few years, I seem to remember some very impressive artwork, almost along the lines of currency printing.
Maybe they've changed.
Most posters have more than adequately offered more reasons for their opinion of Noonan's column than she offered for her opinion of Bush's speech.
While Noonan didn't name call, she did use highly charged and questionable terms in this piece. Words like "inebriated" and "defensive" and in her tv comments last evening "grating". So the posters here are responding to the person that threw out the first inflammatory words, not baselessly lashing out.
That is true and not a falsehood.
"Alan Colmes is such a strange looking person. Do you think he's really an earthling?"
He bears a striking resemblance to that other leftist extra-terrestrial James Carville. Very reptilian...very scary!
cyncooper, I wish to commend your integrity on this thread. Noonan made some fairly imprudent characterizations about GWB's speech. Her's is a subjective analysis: too defensive, too grating, too inebriated. She failed to support these insults. It is fair to nail her on it. I feel that many of the good folks on FR are just as qualified to comment on the speech as Noonan, maybe more.
Here is a link to Jack Wheeler's comments about Ms. Noonon in a Newsmax article.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2004/6/18/141839.shtml
Worth a look for an opinion of one who "worked" with the gracious lady. :-)
MOST posters have given any reasons - ad hominem attacks are not "reasons".
Saying that Noonan is just jealous because she didn't write it is just a baseless accusation and not a reason. Also, saying that "educated women tend to have a god problem" is not a reason.
Your falsehoods stem from the fact that you can't separate ad hominem attacks and insults from logical analysis. That's like saying that Bill Clinton's economic policies were bad because he is jerk.
Thanks for the Wheeler update. I think this is the piece I read after the Reagan funeral. It buttressed my opinion of Noonan as a bit too self-promoting, too "mooning" and romanticizing over her past in the WH,and, well, to use her words, a little too nuanced for me.
After reading this piece (I believe in Newsmax, as Wheeler writes regularly for them and he is a favorite of mine), I was not terribly surprised to see her trash the President's inaugural speech. How can the woman be so stupid--is she egotistical enough to think she could do better, and that her reputation is such that she can afford to do this?
It is very telling that all of Reagan's most famous quotes were written by the other writers and gotten to him around his "protectors" like Baker, who would never have dared to allow the President to utter such sentiments. It is much to Reagan's credit to recognize the drama and strength of these utterances.
vaudine
I'm glad someone else other than myself caught this woman's blazing hypocrisy. Peggy Noonan is a phony.
I know she wraps herself in Regan's mantle, but the woman is a lousy writer, in my opinion. Her style is highly indirect, gauzy, fuzzy and rambling. If she ever gets to a point in a particular article, she sort of gets there almost by accident. I think she's a hypocrite and a phony.
I noted that statement also. An extraordinary point-of-view in many ways.
Your falsehoods about me stem from your inability to distinguish my writings from others and your propensity to take a very few posts (from others, certainly not me) containing ad hominem statements and declaring the majority of the thread is composed of such and then applying my correct description of the majority of posts to the minority.
In addition, you're a bore (as in boring...like Barack).
Ummmmm........Mo's comments were not directly in relation to the speech, Jeff.
Before you jump in to criticize, you should check out what's going on.
I'm not at all surprised that Buckley wasn't enamored with the speech (though this has nothing to do with who the father of conservatism is........and I didn't need Reagan to tell me it was Buckley, even if you did).
Buckley's not a dreamer or visionary; the President is.
Rambling is a good word to discribe this article
I still haven't figured out why she wrote about the fire alarm and Baker in his trench coat or her remembering her eye glasses and not her shoes
The meat of her criticism...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.