I know she wraps herself in Regan's mantle, but the woman is a lousy writer, in my opinion. Her style is highly indirect, gauzy, fuzzy and rambling. If she ever gets to a point in a particular article, she sort of gets there almost by accident. I think she's a hypocrite and a phony.
Rambling is a good word to discribe this article
I still haven't figured out why she wrote about the fire alarm and Baker in his trench coat or her remembering her eye glasses and not her shoes