Majority of Americans disapprove of Bush's Iraq policy, polls say

Yahoo, AFP ^ | Jan 19 05 | YAhoo/AFP

[BykrBayb]

it's amazing how much better care and medicine has helped the lives of our animal friends.

And money. Lots of money.

[BykrBayb]

Is that why you posted it, Neville? To show us how the left is desperately trying to wish away the results of the election? Or was it to try to recruit us over to your side; and away from our nation, our families, and our God?

[BykrBayb]

HEY!!!! Bluff isn't the only female here. She's just the only female here opposed to the United States in this war.

[backhoe]

And money. Lots of money.

True, but it sure is cheaper than medicine for humans!

[BykrBayb]

In most cases, but not in ours. Hubby had a heart attack a few months ago, and we've spent less on doctors, hospital and medicine than we've spent at the vet in the same amount of time.

[backhoe]

Hubby had a heart attack a few months ago-

Ah! Sorry to hear that.

[dennisw]

I hear you on that! :)

[BykrBayb]

Thanks.

[muir_redwoods]

Didn't we just have a poll with a much bigger sample back on 11/2? What were those results? Anybody remember?

[MissAmericanPie]

Iraq did seem to be a left turn in the WOT. Given the information available regarding WMD's, even Iraq's ability to launch their production, attacking and destroying the dictator was the smart move.

The psychological advantage of rolling over the largest Middle East army so easily in the minds of the leaders of Syria, Iran, Yemen, is incalculable.

Now we can only do the best we can regarding elections and putting them on the road to freedom of choice, although, it has a slim chance of working out. The desire of the majority for freedom, even at great risk, is obvious given the enlistment of young men in the Iraqi military and police depts.

Ben Laden is cooling his heels in China and we dare not go there to get him. I say Iran should be our next mark, then Syria. No way should we leave the Middle East, at this time. It would create an unstable void that invites the intervention of Russia or China into the area.

[mewzilla]

I wonder how many of the adults surveyed could find Iraq on a map?

[Peach]

What the Neville Chamberlain of FR forgets is:

Iraq has been on the State Department list of state's sponsoring terrorism for years, even during the 90's.

Bill Clinton's justice department obtained a federal indictment against bin Laden and cited the terrorist's connections with Saddam.

Even the Senate Intelligence Committee Reports stated that:

1. Iraq provided Al Qaeda with chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear training.

2. Direct meetings took place between senior Iraqi military officers and top al Qaeda operatives between the early 90's and 2003.

3. 78 reports from different sources provided information that Hussein's military was actively training Iraqi intelligence officers for terrorist attacks against America and American interests.

During the 90's the mainstream media wrote hundreds of articles about the world's alarm at the growing relationship between Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden. Do they think we can't look this stuff up?

There are hundreds of links below that provide evidence of the relationship that Iraq had to terrorism and to OBL/AQ specifically.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1224050/posts

[Beckwith]

I got your poll swinging!

[Petronski]

Here's a great essay on the mission of MSM and Neville.

[Peach]

I just read that yesterday and meant to save it to my Iraq file; thanks so much for linking it again.

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

Churchbluff is female? That accounts for the hysterical tone re:Iraq she took on before the election.

Liberal men are hysterical too, Dennis.

[nopardons]

Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwww...it hurts to get old. :-(

[nopardons]

Agreed. :-)

[nopardons]

Don't even try to confuse the poor thing with facts...you bad girl you. LOL