yessss!!!
On one hand, the judge recusing himself is admirable and honorable. This is also, however, the reasons we never have a level playing field. You think a liberal judge with a thousand conflicts would recuse himself? Hardly. He'd relish the opportunity to settle a case for his side of the fight, conflicts be damned.
To those of you in Washington, what's your sense of how this thing is gonna play out? Is there a real chance of a re-vote? The evidence of a tainted election is incredibly strong on its face, but that's certainly no guarantee that a court will do the right thing.
MM
Let me say the Washington state GOP has a spine. It's about time someone stand up to the Demonrats and this attempt to steal this election. Demonrats are so comfortable that Republicans will just step back and let them get away with it as in a 'new tone' and it is apparent the Washington state GOP is nothing like the spineless ones in Congress and the White House. The Washington vote has many discrepencies and this is a case where it needs to be confronted and examined thoroughly to find out what was going on with the fraud.
Wonder if its because they're worried that we'll find that 98% of felons are Democrats?
Ping if you haven't read this one yet
The libs wouldn't be stalling and dissing discovery if they didn't have something(s) to hide.....
Leave no stone unturned to keep Fraudoire from illegally taking the reins of the state.
George Washington was the first President of the first nation founded on the principle of government of the people by the people and for the people. All legitimate government is based on the consent of the governed. Fair elections are at the very heart of ascertaining and signifying that consent. Allowing King County's flawed elections office to reverse the winner of two prior counts is an insult to the whole idea of fair elections.
The State's public employee's unions are the single largest contributor to Christine's efforts since Election Day. Union employees run King County's elections office. In Washington State we now have two political parties, one that represents the government and one that represents the citizens. The government party has now sanctioned the handiwork of their comrades in King County; handiwork that mysteriously resulted in hundreds of ballots for which no real voters can be found, handiwork that reversed the outcome of two prior vote counts and resulted in the government party's candidate proclaiming victory.
Christine declares our election system to be a model of how "democracy" should work. Democracy is not the right term for government of the government by the government and for the government. Tyranny would be the correct term for a system were the citizens role is limited to paying the taxes that support the lavish lifestyle of their rulers.
The assumption, of course, is that felons only voted for Dems. Which is probably the case. What a horrible surprise it would be to find felons voting for Rossi.
Dino's request brings into sharp contrast the whiny, obstructionist comment by a SW WA county elections official (can't recall name) who said it would be too difficult to validate every voter. It's their, HELLO, job.
!#@~~##@Ae!!%(*&
2. Secretary of State Sam Reed's attorneys filed papers opposing Rossi's request that discovery be allowed on an expedited basis, but they didn't claim all discovery should end, as the Democrats did.
3. Democratic attorneys said if the court sides with Republicans, it should at least delay
4. Is the new election Republicans want allowed under the state constitution?
The first paragraph quoted is certainly expectable.
The second paragraph = Hero of the people, Sam Reed.
The third paragraph's bolded word reveals the dem strategy in its entirety. Delay till 2008 or infinity.
When fraud is this rampant, and thankfully it is still illegal, people on both sides of the political divide have to stop thinking inside any box. This is untrod territory and we are going to have to find the path as we go.
What's the buzz on Judge Bridges?
What I am not sure of is if you fulfill those things below, yes it will allow you to vote etc, but I don't know if it takes you off a felon list. I doubt it.
Persons convicted of a felony in Washington lose their right to vote until they have completed all the conditions of their sentence, including their legal financial obligations.
What you need to do to regain the right to vote depends on where you were convicted and when you were convicted. The following information explains how to get your right to vote back.
I was convicted by a state court in Washington after 1984 and I have satisfied all of my legal financial obligations (LFO’s).
If you paid your LFO’s while you were still in Department of Corrections (DOC) custody or under supervision, the DOC will notify the sentencing court that all terms of the sentence have been completed, and the court then will issue a certificate of discharge. The court sends a copy to you at the address listed in the court file.
Your right to vote is restored, and you do not need to take any further action. Your right to serve on a jury, sign initiatives, and run for office is also restored. The certificate does not restore the right to possess firearms and does not clear your conviction for employment background check purposes.
If you paid your LFO’s after the DOC terminated their supervision of you, you have a right to petition the court to issue a certificate of discharge. To petition the court for a certificate of discharge....
Felon Voting Rights
The dems thought the republicans would roll over and let themselves be screwed. Isn't that what usually happens? Good for Rossi!! Heard him on Hannity radio show yesterday. Great presence!! He says the people want a re-vote - that's the only way to resolve this situation.
The GOP has gotta go all the way on this one. Expose the fraud and get a re-vote.